atlsfinest
Supporter
- Feb 8, 2009
- 17,920
- 25,084
If he reclassifies, he'll have to choose a school as well, right? I think he ends up at Texas A&M
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can’t he just enroll in the fall and count forward since he hasn’t taken officials?If he reclassifies, he'll have to choose a school as well, right? I think he ends up at Texas A&M
I would love to see how the other schools are approaching it to make it seem "legal"... The NCAA did not want this and are sitting back and watching while schools go crazy or try to figure it out on their own... Then they can jump in and say "see, this is why it doesn't work"... Will be interesting to see how it "works" but like the man said in Nako's post... Buckle upI just returned from a good meeting at LSU that was organized by the Athletic Department and the Consulting Company that is directing LSU and all its license agreements. Here are my thoughts from the meeting. Let me say this. I moved back home to BR just a week ago. I have not been as involved with TAF and the Athletic department as much as I once was. So this was my first meeting back and I did a lot of observing and listening. My thoughts below:
1. I was surprised to see LSU having this first meeting so late into the NIL process. I understand why we probably got out recruited this cycle. For whatever reason I just thought this NILSU “Brand” and work was much much further along. When we were asked to stand if anyone in the audience was part of an NIL deal with a student athlete I would say less than 10 people stood up out of approximately 250 people mostly business owners. Again very surprised at the lack of direction LSU has given the potential donors.
2. The consulting company is a young group of people that seemed to be moving at a snails pace towards real action.
3. Several companies were eager to do some deals but I did not get the impression these would be big money type deals. Everyone was told 2 rules to follow: can’t offer pay to play. And can’t offer $ to gain recruits without an approved NIL deal. Then they followed those 2 rules up with by saying “It’s the wild Wild West”.
4. Coach Kelly spoke first and he did not mention recruiting at all. He said we need supports and businesses to work with our student athletes on NIL deals so LSU does not get passed up…… it does not take a rocket science to know we are already behind.
Conclusion: My business partner and I left the meeting when it was over and both of us wondered how was this going to resonate with season ticket holders and supporters. Allow me to be honest….. I left the NIL meeting really with a bad taste in my mouth about the whole thing. Reason is it is Pay to Play. You can’t put lip-stick on a pig because it’s still A pig. Boutee, Perkins, etc. most of these kids are not going to impact a business campaign at all. i Don’t know how all this is going to end but buckle up for a strange ride.
It's absolutely pay for play but they want it cleaned up and on the books/recorded so they can at least monitor it. The interesting part is the varying state laws around it.I would love to see how the other schools are approaching it to make it seem "legal"... The NCAA did not want this and are sitting back and watching while schools go crazy or try to figure it out on their own... Then they can jump in and say "see, this is why it doesn't work"... Will be interesting to see how it "works" but like the man said in Nako's post... Buckle up
So everyone knew he went out there to take the job except for the Vikings.
He was a pre-season all american so prob that hypeLots of hurt feelings when upper class men were benched for freshman word to K’Vaughn Pope
And I don’t know where they got that first round projection from
He was a pre-season all american so prob that hype