- 4,773
- 7,503
I kind of wondered if that would be an easy coat on top....Angelus makes paint for y'all that hate the shade of red.
Who hates the Chicagos tho?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I kind of wondered if that would be an easy coat on top....Angelus makes paint for y'all that hate the shade of red.
Who hates the Chicagos tho?
2015 Chicagos were dope. Anyone saying otherwise should be ignored and prayed for.Im seeing that happen with the chicagos now that this rumor is spreading about their rerelease. They werent perfect but they were a solid retro for sure
You sound pissed bro
Overall, you're right, the retro was one of the best.
Some cats just want/wanted a different shade of red. That's all.
You mean the crimsonBreds?Basically.
Love the shape height everything about the shoe but that red. Nahhhhh b.
No problem with Chicagos I wear those daily.
However 16 breds = trash bagssssss
I don't care who gets offended lol that red is pitiful. Gimme plastic sneakers before you gimme that.
Id take blood red(not the gang but the color) over those 2013 bricksWho hates the Chicagos tho?
This. I cry a lil bit inside everytime I see that dark red.Some of y'all get emotional over opinions on a sneaker forum.
Why post? In everyone agreed this place would be boring.
The fact of the matter is MOST people in this thread like that red.. however for me personally nah it should have been WAY brighter...
Id take blood red(not the gang but the color) over those 2013 bricks
You mean the crimsonBreds?
idk fam, ive seen comparisons where the og red was the same as the 2016. 2001 was the brightest but mehY'all in here fronting like Jordan brand did y'all a bunch of justice with them breds.. [emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji]
The color only that dark because they gonna come back out with the correct shade of red..
bordeaux, hares, cement 4s, and true blues fit this perfectly.JB has always done this. They are shady MFs.
They give you something you really want................
and make it balls out limited.
They then give you a huge release of something you want........................
then they'll take something special away about it they know you really wanted. So you win...but you still feel defeated.
They raise the price and tell you it's remastered........................
and they make half of the shoe ****, while the other half is remastered.
JB my bruhs, JB.
I'm skeptical about the Chis re-releasing in 2017. Last time they released May 30th and the production dates on my pair read 12/10-02/09, so I find it hard to believe someone has made pairs already. I feel like we would have heard something by now if they were releasing.
Good that they are preparing to re-up the Chis. I will go ahead and start preparing for my L now .... campfire, marshmellows, guitars and all, just like 15'.
idk fam, ive seen comparisons where the og red was the same as the 2016. 2001 was the brightest but meh
idk fam, ive seen comparisons where the og red was the same as the 2016. 2001 was the brightest but meh
well hell, I was satisfied [emoji]128557[/emoji]Its true but I have seen 85s that look bright but then I seen more aged ones that look dark as hell... literally
thats different lol[emoji]128064[/emoji][emoji]128064[/emoji][emoji]128064[/emoji][emoji]128064[/emoji]
What if the royals are more navy this time around.. anybody gonna pass?
I will never understand why black/blue colorways get some type "Dark Knight" nickname when none of Batman's gear or tech had blue in it. It was Black and gold.I'll cop but I won't call em royals
They be Dark Knights