- 21,357
- 66,405
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2001
He wasn’t talking about mochas bruh
Official Air Jordan 1 Retro High Thread Vol: Best Model/Thread
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Spectacular23,
- Start date
- 1,211
- 2,523
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2005
Lollll. Whoops. Mocha travs definitely going up IF those fragxtravs really do release. Reading is fun-duh-mental
sorry folks
- 22,689
- 45,839
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2014
So glad I learned from my Union 1 L and grabbed the Trav's when I did.
- 1,211
- 2,523
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2005
We’re in the same boat-got travs for a shade under $900. I kick myself everyday for passing on Unions for $700-$800
Nothing will ever quell that rage inside me regrets.TORN between grabbing Travis dunks or Blue Unions 1s with some credit on GOAT.
Anyone who owns both wanna chime in???
Last edited:
- 11,510
- 5,890
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
I may be in the minority, but I felt like 85 Retros are more comfortable than the Retro High OG just because they're board-lasted.
-Drew
100% agree. Regular ones feel like banana peels on feet now. Ppl saying otherwise simply havent worn their sneakers.
- 31,417
- 65,435
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2018
Huh?
- 5,253
- 6,949
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2016
Stop stealing my pose fam will have to sue you
- 4,631
- 6,991
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2014
- 14,573
- 19,317
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2008
There's definitely a noticeable difference, but remastered 1s aren't suddenly "garbage" by any stretch of the means 
- 1,493
- 2,287
- Joined
- May 25, 2013
It really is like day and night rotating from 85 rev breds to spider man chi’s or 2017 royals. The 2017 royals are soft as butter and make the 85s feel like boots. Idk which fit I prefer but I love the look of both. The 85 rev bred I doubled up on. Tanks!
- 22,689
- 45,839
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2014
remastered 1's aren't garbage....but if I could switch them all out and make them 85's. I would.
AirLoMax614
formerly baconandjordans
- 4,464
- 12,973
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2014
$900 for some sneakers is insanity to me.
- 1,643
- 4,230
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2005
Hell no!!
- 4,631
- 6,991
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2014
- 4,596
- 5,447
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2004
White tongue looks so trash lol
- 1,381
- 10,849
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2016
- 5,123
- 7,041
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2018
Especially for a sneaker that was what $160/$180 at release? Hell no.
Take away the Travis Scott and Fragment connection.....just another 1 release.
- 24,441
- 22,116
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2015
Just a friendly reminder how great the ‘85 is...
- 21,357
- 66,405
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2001
That’s you bruh? 
- 12,620
- 27,379
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2014
Those candy cane joints do nothing for me
but I guess I haven’t held them in hand
apparently that’s the only way to know
but I guess I haven’t held them in hand
apparently that’s the only way to know
- 8,010
- 14,745
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2010
we don't care what you say they are called and we certainly don't give a damn about what shoetubers say!Question... Why some folks calling these OG UNC 1s? Nike labeled them Powder blue... So technically the suede pairs are the first UNC 1s...
Think some youtubers were saying this as well...
- 3,760
- 8,984
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2014
Today's resell scope:
$200-$250- "I'm just trying to get my money back or I'll hook you up for"; shipping, taxes, etc...
$270-$330- Impulsive cop after striking out/ Anne Herbert son's club
$400-$580- You're QS and Tier zero releases that you probably would've spent $270-$350 a decade + ago, or some essentials you slept on that you'll always say I'll cop eventually i.e. shadows, royals, etc.
$650> - You're Designer/Musician collabs for social media clout/ the internet celebs
- 1,479
- 3,201
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2017
Sounds about right
- 2,513
- 32,920
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
