Official Air Jordan 1 Retro High Thread Vol: Best Model/Thread

[ozboi]

Clearly some resellers eat waaaaayyyyy too much.

[emoji]128064[/emoji][emoji]128064[/emoji][emoji]128064[/emoji][emoji]128064[/emoji] shotzzz fired [emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji]

 

[gothmog]

better than the normal royals with the crocodile swoosh 

 

[aquamanjay]

better than the normal royals with the crocodile swoosh 

nah

 

[GrizzlyAnimal]

 

[airraab]

I hope the Royal Satins are a Los Angeles release only

 

[GrizzlyAnimal]

 

 

[headdetective]

Both satins look garbage on foot.

False.

They look dope AF and stand out from the rest of the black/red 1's.

Pics don't do justice.

 

[tr23]

Those satins remind me of those awful Orlando pair that dropped a while back. Blue looks to bright

 

[Magic33]

Such a nice day in NYC decided to unDS these .... glad to see folks were able to pick up ASG 1s who wanted them. While I know it's foolish but the unknown of the toebox quality coupled with the $15 increase (and royals on the horizon) kept me away ... for now. Feel the ASG 1s will restock (i.e. back-to-school restocks) and there will be disco opportunities.

 

[GrizzlyAnimal]

Flame 

 

[george2323]

For anyone that could use it....

 

[lad2050]

Those satins remind me of those awful Orlando pair that dropped a while back. Blue looks to bright

I threw up a little looking at those [emoji]128567[/emoji]
But I find it suspicious how satin Royals pop up after I mentioned it [emoji]129300[/emoji]

 

[bdrake823]

 

[SoleByThePound]

Added these lace locks to the breds today

Stay Scheming did a good job on those lace plates. I have them in my Blk/Red pair as well.

 

[jaynev]

Damn, a return 15 minutes ago on the AS1's at my local FA in my size, just happened to be walking through.. ugh already passed once online.

 

[pmpdaddyrobford]

OK guys, need your help
Should I get;
2013 breds vnds for 300
OR
2016 for 340

 

[gambit11]

OK guys, need your help
Should I get;
2013 breds vnds for 300
OR
2016 for 340

Whats the condition on the 2016?

 

[earlgotsole]

OK guys, need your help
Should I get;
2013 breds vnds for 300
OR
2016 for 340

2016. Your feet will thank you later.

 

[pmpdaddyrobford]

OK guys, need your help

Should I get;

2013 breds vnds for 300

OR

2016 for 340

Whats the condition on the 2016?

would be ds

OK guys, need your help

Should I get;

2013 breds vnds for 300

OR

2016 for 340

2016. Your feet will thank you later.

I heard but I could just get a fool length zoom insole

 

[gambit11]

DS>Used

Comfort>Not Comfort 

 

[earlgotsole]

 

[rhinosport]

I guess it depends on what your going after? A more traditional look with leather? Or the restomod look with tumbled leather. And 13s are not uncomfortable like many say...

 

[earlgotsole]

would be ds
I heard but I could just get a fool length zoom insole

No, its way more than that. There is way more padding in the ankle area. The tongue is thicker and the shoe feels more reinforced with cushion thank the 2013 version.

 

[pmpdaddyrobford]

I guess it depends on what your going after? A more traditional look with leather? Or the restomod look with tumbled leather. And 13s are not uncomfortable like many say...

tumbled swoosh bothers me. Not so much on royals tho plus 2013 is a better red right?

would be ds

I heard but I could just get a fool length zoom insole

No, its way more than that. There is way more padding in the ankle area. The tongue is thicker and the shoe feels more reinforced with cushion thank the 2013 version.

honestly I wear my shoes loose so ankle padding was never much of a factor on any shoe to me, but thx for the info

 

[atdizzle]

OK guys, need your help
Should I get;
2013 breds vnds for 300
OR
2016 for 340

which is better quality? id take that one.