When I finally got my pair (which was fairly quick, using the "Standard" shipping method via nikestore), I compared them with my 2011 pair, and honestly, the quality is damn-near identical. I was expecting a noticeable difference in the quality, but that is definitely not the case. However, the 2011 pair wasn't bad, in my opinion, so it's not like I'm disappointed or anything. The 2011 White/Cement 3 was easily one of my most worn shoes in 2012 (that and the 2012 White/Cement 4s), so I'm happy as hell to have another pair on deck, for retail, with the "Nike Air" on back to top it off. And yes, I am happy that the shoes have the "Nike Air" on the back, unlike you weirdos that suddenly love the Jumpman branding as opposed to the OG "Nike Air". Y'all "Hatebeasts" are really letting your heads get clouded with that BS, not wanting to like something that other people happen to like, at any costs. Y'all cry about it when JB changes the slightest detail from the OG pairs they retro, but when they actually bring back the "Nike Air" from the OG pairs, making it that much closer to the original, iconic pair, y'all suddenly hate it, and this shoe is "only for the Hypebeasts". Isn't the whole thing about hypebeasts that they only like stuff that is popular, instead of liking something regardless of what people think? So, if you only like stuff that isn't popular, instead of liking something regardless of what people think, aren't you doing the exact same thing y'all harp about? Marinate on that one...