- 4,857
- 14
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by Answer IV DMX
Not a single post about the Wings game last night? Blasphemy. I'm going to have to start posting in here.
Sweep and more rest for Zetterburg
Originally Posted by Answer IV DMX
Not a single post about the Wings game last night? Blasphemy. I'm going to have to start posting in here.
Sweep and more rest for Zetterburg
I have cut back posting in here because it seems like I was just talking to myselfOriginally Posted by Answer IV DMX
Not a single post about the Wings game last night? Blasphemy. I'm going to have to start posting in here.
Sweep and more rest for Zetterburg
I have cut back posting in here because it seems like I was just talking to myselfOriginally Posted by Answer IV DMX
Not a single post about the Wings game last night? Blasphemy. I'm going to have to start posting in here.
Sweep and more rest for Zetterburg
He left his feet on both hits....absolute no-no. Intent to injure was deliberate with both IMO.Originally Posted by True Blues
DoubleJs: There are some subtle differences. With the McAmmond hit, Downie was (a) looking for retribution on McAmmond (they had got into it earlier in the game); (b) hit him in the head.
He left his feet on both hits....absolute no-no. Intent to injure was deliberate with both IMO.Originally Posted by True Blues
DoubleJs: There are some subtle differences. With the McAmmond hit, Downie was (a) looking for retribution on McAmmond (they had got into it earlier in the game); (b) hit him in the head.
Obviously, it's against the rules, but guys leave their feet all the time without punishment. Downie, though, was suspended based on his reputation, and because there was no penalty on the play. If he had got a GM or even 5, I doubt there would have been a suspension.Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
He left his feet on both hits....absolute no-no. Intent to injure was deliberate with both IMO.Originally Posted by True Blues
DoubleJs: There are some subtle differences. With the McAmmond hit, Downie was (a) looking for retribution on McAmmond (they had got into it earlier in the game); (b) hit him in the head.
Obviously, it's against the rules, but guys leave their feet all the time without punishment. Downie, though, was suspended based on his reputation, and because there was no penalty on the play. If he had got a GM or even 5, I doubt there would have been a suspension.Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
He left his feet on both hits....absolute no-no. Intent to injure was deliberate with both IMO.Originally Posted by True Blues
DoubleJs: There are some subtle differences. With the McAmmond hit, Downie was (a) looking for retribution on McAmmond (they had got into it earlier in the game); (b) hit him in the head.
Not shocked because this is a veteran team with star power and a couple youngsters coming up that are doing real good work (Howie, Helm, Abdelkader, Miller to some extent), but they were beyond inconsistent to the point that they looked downright bad coming down the stretch. I'm not surprised they took the first two at the joe, but was definitely surprised with the outcome last night.Originally Posted by Proshares
I was shocked the Wings have looked this good TBH. Or I just really overrated Phoenix