.I'd follow her and lend her my banner
.
I aint saying he's the epitome of evil. I'm just not going to feel sorry for dude when he reveals a sad story about his past and I'm not gonna forget it just cuz the character appears to have changed.
I don't know why ppl keep saying this. It's only been mentioned that Targayens did it and so far all of them are dead but one and no nobody loves any living Targaryens that are actively engaging in incest. So please stop with this tired excuse.
Still craving her brother's D all up in her guts? Idk.
She still has some trauma from when Robert consummated their loveless marriage. She doesn't like it. She said it in a previous ep but she basically wish she was born a dude. She feels she's listened to her pops the most and learned from it but she's obviously not that smart. Cersi doesn't like being told what to do, she doesn't like being used and basically sold. She thinks she's smart enough to be the manipulator despite not having any of the experience.
To me, knowing Cersi, if she knew that she'd see it as an opportunity to blackmail him not something she'd hate in her new arranged marriage. It'd mean she got to avoid the forced sex and forced faking of it all. Plus at this point it's clear she's not looking for love and in her sick head she probably thinks she has that with Jaime anyway.
I've read the books up until a point. I know Martin aint finished so I'm in no rush to get caught up and be left waiting for more books while the show is still behind.
I know he does other things but not aware of that.
Amazon has the first 4 books bundled for under $20, which is a steal.
you think that way because your trying to view the story from a modern perspective. is pushing a little kid out of a window in order to protect your last name twisted in todays society? Yes, but so is 95% of all of the other things in the book. You say Robert is a drunk and an a-hole, so with Tywin, and this is true. But how come so many people love those 2 characters but hate jamie because he pushed a kid down a window. In my eyes, he is probably has more morals than both of the 2.
I'm viewing this from my perspective, I just happen to be living in modern times. I like fantasy and fiction and the story is great but I'm not going to change the way I think so I can fit in the times of a medieval fictional piece
Half of that has already come to pass. There is a war. Innocents have already died. Only exception is the children born from incest are not dead. Cersi deserves to die. So, so what if she does? Don't do the crime if you're not willing to suffer the consequences. The children dying would be up to King Robert but with Ned at his side he could've found away to send them back to Tywin unharmed, of course Tywin would've probably killed them once the truth was out so there's that. Incest children die, that's just how it is during those times. Also it is not some fact that Tywin would definitely go to war if it was proven that Cersi and Jaime committed incest and they and her children were killed for it. Even if he did, Tywin would lose. There's no way he'd stand against the King's army and the other banner houses backing him. Tywin had problems with Robb's men, he would not survive against them along with Stannis' army. and you're trying to put the location and time frame from the story (as if it wasn't a crime then like it is now) around that scenario to further justify those actions 
Ned did try to save the children, and in the end it screwed him over. He couldn't stop Robert from slaughtering the Targaryean babies, or from sending assassins to Daenerys, so he knew not to even bother try to convince Robert with Cersei's children.
If people don't wanna Jaime its one thing, blaming Bran really is completely farfetched.
I think Robert would have done it himself if he was there. Either way ordering it and doing it, not much a difference.
http://quartermaester.info/
For non-bookreaders, careful with that one as it will be based off books, so a character or location page may contain spoilers.
