- Apr 2, 2014
- 11,847
- 26,163
These abominations look like swap meet reps from 10 years ago
Anyway, haven't unDS'd my '22s yet because my '97s are still damn-near perfect
Today:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyway, haven't unDS'd my '22 abominations yet because my '97s are still damn-near perfect
Today:
yep...its more angular...These abominations look like swap meet reps from 10 years ago
Anyway, haven't unDS'd my '22s yet because my '97s are still damn-near perfect
Today:
These abominations look like swap meet reps from 10 years ago
Anyway, haven't unDS'd my '22s yet because my '97s are still damn-near perfect
Today:
How did you get them to look close to new like it was 1997? Most parts of that pair look like they came out of the box, albeit with some small signs of wear and usage. The only sign of aging is the soles are slightly discolored, which is an unfortunate formality by default.
And how did the tabs not crack from aging? The tabs on the sides cracking over time has been a formality with the XII. It happened to the 2004 White/Sky Blue XII I had before I discarded them either late last year or early this year, I actually forgot the time.
Perhaps you didn't wear those much since you've had them, so that's why they look somewhat close to new.
I think it started in '09 with the retro.Like to call most White/Red Jordans "Cherry"
because...mmm cherry yum.
Not sure where the gimmick name came from or even when it started honestly but its one of the few i actually like.
Ahh yes, sneakerhead problems.
One of the reasons why ive become so selective on pickups even after having moved into a house.
At one point in my 20s while still renting had an entire room in the apartment just for shoe storage and promised myself id never have a collection that large again.
Promise kept and couldnt be any happier.
Currently if it cant fit inside the closet then either i need to pass up on a release or let one go. Think in total im at somewhere around 30,
dress shoes hiking boots and other miscellaneous pairs included with 40 being max.
In my 20s it was unfiltered indulgence, somewhere around 50+ which id imagine is nothing to some here and thats great for them. Just remembered the guest room being stacked with boxes, a lot of unnecessary filler and thats just not me.
Yeah, I don't wear any of my shoes a lot because I have a zillion pairs. Honestly I have enough that I could easily go over a year without doubling up. And I have specific pairs I wear in crappy weather so they take the brunt of my abuse. These I got in VNDS condition almost 10yrs ago, and I wear them probably three or four times a year. Always afraid of the sole coming separating, honestly, but knock wood, no issues yet. I used leather butter on them a while back to keep them rich looking, and I wipe them down with an alcohol-free baby wipe if they get a little scuzzy. A drop or two of blue Dawn on a warm, damp paper towel helps, too. And I'll admit, I did use a Mr. Clean magic eraser on the sides of the sole before I wore them this weekend.
Honestly, I'm shocked the side tabs aren't yellow, but that seems to be a specific positive trait to the OGs. If you look at listings on ebay and stuff for the 97s there are quite a few that have nice, complete grey tabs if the shoes themselves aren't beat. The 2004s on the other hand are almost all an ugly, ugly yellow and/or cracked to hell. I'd imagine they either used a different material in the tabs on each year's pair, or it may have to do with climate and storage and stuff. I have no idea, myself.
But yeah, I love these things, and it's cool to have an OG pair of Js from his playing days that I can actually wear.
Edit: Just searched my email for the confirmation, and I spent $87.65 shipped on them. My winning bid was $71
Release these in mens
Did a stock take of my 12s collection, I have them all since late 2014:
Did a stock take of my 12s collection, I have them all since late 2014:
Taking a good look at this again. Really we have 4 dominant colors.
Blue.
6 blue pairs that let’s be honest, all look the same shade of color from this distance. Oh but Nike steps out of bounds and adds a little tiny 2 inch space total of yellow. Wow.
Red.
Just like the blue, at this distance we have 4 red shoes that all look like the same shade of red. What on earth! Then they give us a little maroon. And that looks like the same shade of maroon on each pair.
Black.
6 shoes of solid black. One with a hint of blue. One with a hint of red. One with a hint of silver. If you include the pink and the royals from the blue column you have 8. 8 nearly all black to black with a hint of another color. WHERE IS THE ORIGINALITY HERE?
White.
3 all whites that literally have no difference to them at this distance. If you squint you might see a little one inch rectangle of color difference. WHOOPTEE FREAKING DO. Then we also have 5 that have white and black in nearly an identical silhouette. When you squint at the picture those 5 look the exact same!
Seriously who is running the Jordan 12 division? Something here is definitely wrong.
Taking a good look at this again. Really we have 4 dominant colors.
Blue.
6 blue pairs that let’s be honest, all look the same shade of color from this distance. Oh but Nike steps out of bounds and adds a little tiny 2 inch space total of yellow. Wow.
Red.
Just like the blue, at this distance we have 4 red shoes that all look like the same shade of red. What on earth! Then they give us a little maroon. And that looks like the same shade of maroon on each pair.
Black.
6 shoes of solid black. One with a hint of blue. One with a hint of red. One with a hint of silver. If you include the pink and the royals from the blue column you have 8. 8 nearly all black to black with a hint of another color. WHERE IS THE ORIGINALITY HERE?
White.
3 all whites that literally have no difference to them at this distance. If you squint you might see a little one inch rectangle of color difference. WHOOPTEE FREAKING DO. Then we also have 5 that have white and black in nearly an identical silhouette. When you squint at the picture those 5 look the exact same!
Seriously who is running the Jordan 12 division? Something here is definitely wrong.
Umm, the royal blue pair and the Michigans are a totally different shade of blue... I regret not getting both, at least the Michigan pair at retail. Alomg with CP3s.