- 14,132
- 285
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2004
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Most of that is due to us inexplicably double teaming Oden in the post when he has only 2 moves in his arsenal, a dunk and a hook one way, andthen scrambling trying to get back. Why do it, it just makes no sense at all.Originally Posted by KB8sandiego
That was a bad call by the ref.
Batum didn't even touch Ariza.
But I'll take it.
Man, I'm really enjoying the way Portland is moving the ball. They always seem to find an open shooter on the wing. Thankfully, they're missing them.
Originally Posted by KB8sandiego
That was a bad call by the ref.
Batum didn't even touch Ariza.
But I'll take it.
Man, I'm really enjoying the way Portland is moving the ball. They always seem to find an open shooter on the wing. Thankfully, they're missing them.
We don't want David Lee.Originally Posted by Beats05
Blazers fans: enlighten me on why your team wants David Lee and how his acquisition would change your line up. It seems like you guys are set with Aldridge and Oden at the 4 and 5. Would Lee come off the bench? All three of Aldridge, Oden, and Lee will be very expensive to keep together and putting any on the bench would seem like a huge waste. I don't get it.
Originally Posted by KB8sandiego
Uh huh.
My dude Fish.
Sharpshootin.
He has played SF a lot over the last few years for the Knicks. I wouldnt make him come off the bench, if they got him i can see him starting atSF. Blazers would beOriginally Posted by Beats05
Blazers fans: enlighten me on why your team wants David Lee and how his acquisition would change your line up. It seems like you guys are set with Aldridge and Oden at the 4 and 5. Would Lee come off the bench? All three of Aldridge, Oden, and Lee will be very expensive to keep together and putting any on the bench would seem like a huge waste. I don't get it.