- 7,240
- 13,557
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2015
Really think jabari gonna have a big night tonight ![Smoking :smokin :smokin](/styles/default/xenforo/NTemojis/smokin.gif)
![Smoking :smokin :smokin](/styles/default/xenforo/NTemojis/smokin.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
He still smashing Ledlow?Really think jabari gonna have a big night tonight![]()
Sixers weren’t gonna get burned by the Lakers again like they did when the Lakers took D’Lo.
Clips / Den is huge for seeding as well. Winner is essentially in 8th in the west and Den loses the tie breaker if they lose.
If the Lakers don't get Bron and PG, I'm assuming they'll tank again next season? I was told being a middle of the pack team is the worst possible thing in the NBA. You should either be contending or tanking, I heard.
Unless you are Boston, then you can contend while letting other teams tank for you.
Damn
If the Lakers don't get Bron and PG, I'm assuming they'll tank again next season? I was told being a middle of the pack team is the worst possible thing in the NBA. You should either be contending or tanking, I heard.
It's because they thought Fultz was off limits. No one knew Danny wanted Tatum over Fultz. If they thought Fultz had a remote chance of falling, they would be smittin just as much as the Sixers.
These are facts. Wish the Spurs tanked.If the Lakers don't get Bron and PG, I'm assuming they'll tank again next season? I was told being a middle of the pack team is the worst possible thing in the NBA. You should either be contending or tanking, I heard.
This is inconsistent.
You're saying "all reports" said that after the trade actually happening. So maybe you have an argument about Ainge wanting Tatum, but to say the Lakers would have taken Ball even if Fultz was available is a huge assumption, one that I do not agree with at all.
If it's 6 or after Philly gets it and Boston gets next year's, is that right?
Philly is most likely getting this year's Lakers pick (would have to be between 2-5 for the Celtics to get it and as of now there's only a 3% chance of that happening) which means the Celtics in all likelihood will have Sacramento's unprotected 2019 pick.
IDK I feel like they give away their pick every other year.When did the Kings give away their 2019 pick?
When did the Kings give away their 2019 pick?
On Thursday, Philadelphia completed a trade that sent the rights to Arturas Gudaitis and Luka Mitrovic, drafted 47th- and 60th-overall in this year’s draft respectively, to the Kings in exchange for sophomore shooting guard Nik Stauskas, veteran big men Carl Landry and Jason Thompson, Sacramento’s 2018 first-round pick, and the right to swap firsts with Sacramento in both 2016 and 2017.
For the Kings, the move cleared the cap space necessary to reportedly extend offers to Rajon Rondo, Marco Belinelli, and Kosta Koufos, and for Philadelphia, it allowed the team to acquire a 2014 lottery pick in Stauskas, two experienced frontcourt players on manageable contracts in Landry and Thompson, and a handful of valuable future draft considerations all for the cost of rented cap space and essentially two second-round picks.
Prime Wade was electrifying. I almost hate to see him lumbering nowadays.
If SAC gets the #1 pick next year the pick stays with Philly I thought
The 76ers own the Sacramento Kings’ first-round pick, with no protections, for 2019. That came to them via the Nik Stauskas trade, one of the strangest in recent NBA history. That deal also is the reason the Sixers had the No. 3 pick in this draft — the Kings’ pick actually won the lottery slot, but Philadelphia had the right to trade picks.
Now the Celtics get to take the higher of the 76ers and Kings’ 2019 picks — unless, again, it’s No. 1 overall.