Official New York Yankees Offseason Thread

Originally Posted by Yankeephan87

Why dont we sign Soriano? If we paid farnsworth 7 mill a year Im sure 10 mill a year isnt bad. But I think Boras wants 15 ugh

I heard a lil bit about the Yankees considering it if all else fails

But will Soriano want to go from Closer to Setup guy for 2-3 years.. Probably not...


Now with Grienke... It depends what the Royals want.. They want a lot of prospects.. HELL NO.. AT best he will be a #4 starter.. No need to unload prospects for a #4... 


Originally Posted by codex57

Don't you guys like Scott Downs to help combat this Crawford signing?
If we could resign Wood, keep Moseley as a long reliever...  Joba & Marte as bullpen guys with Scott Downs and Jessie Crain with Mo as the closer, our bullpen would be ridiculous


Wood is the #2 priority after Cliff Lee now, if Downs risks re-signing Wood then I decline..
 
Originally Posted by Essential1

Yankeephan87 wrote:


Now with Grienke... It depends what the Royals want.. They want a lot of prospects.. HELL NO.. AT best he will be a #4 starter.. No need to unload prospects for a #4... 


Originally Posted by codex57


LOL wut. Greinke would have the best stuff out of anyone in that rotation, including C.C and Cliff (provided they sign him). On what planet would Zack Greinke be considered a number 4?
That anxiety stuff is way overblown, as is the ridiculous notion that he would fail in New York. His issues with it were 4 years ago, around 2006, and since then he has shown he is a top flight starting pitcher in the majors with THREE plus-plus pitches. I don't care if it's Boston or New York, a mid 90s fastball with movement, power slider, and late-breaking curve will play anywhere.
 
Originally Posted by Essential1

Yankeephan87 wrote:


Now with Grienke... It depends what the Royals want.. They want a lot of prospects.. HELL NO.. AT best he will be a #4 starter.. No need to unload prospects for a #4... 


Originally Posted by codex57


LOL wut. Greinke would have the best stuff out of anyone in that rotation, including C.C and Cliff (provided they sign him). On what planet would Zack Greinke be considered a number 4?
That anxiety stuff is way overblown, as is the ridiculous notion that he would fail in New York. His issues with it were 4 years ago, around 2006, and since then he has shown he is a top flight starting pitcher in the majors with THREE plus-plus pitches. I don't care if it's Boston or New York, a mid 90s fastball with movement, power slider, and late-breaking curve will play anywhere.
 
Originally Posted by abovelegit1

Originally Posted by Essential1

Yankeephan87 wrote:


Now with Grienke... It depends what the Royals want.. They want a lot of prospects.. HELL NO.. AT best he will be a #4 starter.. No need to unload prospects for a #4... 


Originally Posted by codex57
LOL wut. Greinke would have the best stuff out of anyone in that rotation, including C.C and Cliff (provided they sign him). On what planet would Zack Greinke be considered a number 4?
That anxiety stuff is way overblown, as is ridiculous notion that he would fail completely in New York. His issues with it were 4 years ago, around 2006, and since then he has shown he is a top flight starting pitcher in the majors. I don't care if it's Boston or New York, a mid 90s fastball with movement, power slider, and late-breaking curve will play anywhere.

except in Kansas City where he's had 1 great year, and 5 mediocre/ terrible years...

And I will take Hughes and Pettitte (especially Pettitte) any day of the week over him..  And I'll take C.C. and Cliff Lee (EASILY) over Greinke..

Selling him like he is Kevin Brown, Javi Vasquez, or Carl Pavano... Oh Wait, those guys were can't miss either..
 
Originally Posted by abovelegit1

Originally Posted by Essential1

Yankeephan87 wrote:


Now with Grienke... It depends what the Royals want.. They want a lot of prospects.. HELL NO.. AT best he will be a #4 starter.. No need to unload prospects for a #4... 


Originally Posted by codex57
LOL wut. Greinke would have the best stuff out of anyone in that rotation, including C.C and Cliff (provided they sign him). On what planet would Zack Greinke be considered a number 4?
That anxiety stuff is way overblown, as is ridiculous notion that he would fail completely in New York. His issues with it were 4 years ago, around 2006, and since then he has shown he is a top flight starting pitcher in the majors. I don't care if it's Boston or New York, a mid 90s fastball with movement, power slider, and late-breaking curve will play anywhere.

except in Kansas City where he's had 1 great year, and 5 mediocre/ terrible years...

And I will take Hughes and Pettitte (especially Pettitte) any day of the week over him..  And I'll take C.C. and Cliff Lee (EASILY) over Greinke..

Selling him like he is Kevin Brown, Javi Vasquez, or Carl Pavano... Oh Wait, those guys were can't miss either..
 
7 years for Lee... I usually try and support every move made, but I don't know if I can for his offer. The money is not the issue at all, but its the seven years that I have the issue with. That many years is rather long for a pitcher at his age.

I know what he's all about, but still. Basically Boston's moves of getting Gonzalez and now Crawford will force Cashman to make sure he signs Lee.
 
7 years for Lee... I usually try and support every move made, but I don't know if I can for his offer. The money is not the issue at all, but its the seven years that I have the issue with. That many years is rather long for a pitcher at his age.

I know what he's all about, but still. Basically Boston's moves of getting Gonzalez and now Crawford will force Cashman to make sure he signs Lee.
 
Originally Posted by Essential1

Originally Posted by abovelegit1

Originally Posted by Essential1

Yankeephan87 wrote:


Now with Grienke... It depends what the Royals want.. They want a lot of prospects.. HELL NO.. AT best he will be a #4 starter.. No need to unload prospects for a #4... 


Originally Posted by codex57
LOL wut. Greinke would have the best stuff out of anyone in that rotation, including C.C and Cliff (provided they sign him). On what planet would Zack Greinke be considered a number 4?
That anxiety stuff is way overblown, as is ridiculous notion that he would fail completely in New York. His issues with it were 4 years ago, around 2006, and since then he has shown he is a top flight starting pitcher in the majors. I don't care if it's Boston or New York, a mid 90s fastball with movement, power slider, and late-breaking curve will play anywhere.
except in Kansas City where he's had 1 great year, and 5 mediocre/ terrible years...

And I will take Hughes and Pettitte (especially Pettitte) any day of the week over him..  And I'll take C.C. and Cliff Lee (EASILY) over Greinke..

Selling him like he is Kevin Brown, Javi Vasquez, or Carl Pavano... Oh Wait, those guys were can't miss either..


You sir, have no idea what you're talking about. I'm sure you looked at his ERA last year, and came to a few idiotic conclusions, namely that he had a terrible year last year, or that he is somehow an inferior pitcher to Andy Pettitte or Phil Hughes (which is laughable BTW). The fact is that he has been a stud pitcher for 3 consecutive years, and that his performance last season was not close to what his ERA suggests. 
His FIP (fielding independent pitching) was 3.34 last season, ahead of the likes of Clay Bucholz, David Price, and yes C.C Sabathia. Not only that, but his calculated Wins above replacement (all inclusive metric that calculates a player's value over a replacement player) was 5.2, above guys like Kershaw, Lincecum, and again Sabathia. I like how you referenced Brown (who was 39 when he came to NY), Vasquez (career NLer who is average anyway), and Pavano (who was constantly hurt) to make your point. So you just go ahead and use your bogus arbitrary analysis to come to your conclusions about a pitcher and i'll use mine.
 
Originally Posted by Essential1

Originally Posted by abovelegit1

Originally Posted by Essential1

Yankeephan87 wrote:


Now with Grienke... It depends what the Royals want.. They want a lot of prospects.. HELL NO.. AT best he will be a #4 starter.. No need to unload prospects for a #4... 


Originally Posted by codex57
LOL wut. Greinke would have the best stuff out of anyone in that rotation, including C.C and Cliff (provided they sign him). On what planet would Zack Greinke be considered a number 4?
That anxiety stuff is way overblown, as is ridiculous notion that he would fail completely in New York. His issues with it were 4 years ago, around 2006, and since then he has shown he is a top flight starting pitcher in the majors. I don't care if it's Boston or New York, a mid 90s fastball with movement, power slider, and late-breaking curve will play anywhere.
except in Kansas City where he's had 1 great year, and 5 mediocre/ terrible years...

And I will take Hughes and Pettitte (especially Pettitte) any day of the week over him..  And I'll take C.C. and Cliff Lee (EASILY) over Greinke..

Selling him like he is Kevin Brown, Javi Vasquez, or Carl Pavano... Oh Wait, those guys were can't miss either..


You sir, have no idea what you're talking about. I'm sure you looked at his ERA last year, and came to a few idiotic conclusions, namely that he had a terrible year last year, or that he is somehow an inferior pitcher to Andy Pettitte or Phil Hughes (which is laughable BTW). The fact is that he has been a stud pitcher for 3 consecutive years, and that his performance last season was not close to what his ERA suggests. 
His FIP (fielding independent pitching) was 3.34 last season, ahead of the likes of Clay Bucholz, David Price, and yes C.C Sabathia. Not only that, but his calculated Wins above replacement (all inclusive metric that calculates a player's value over a replacement player) was 5.2, above guys like Kershaw, Lincecum, and again Sabathia. I like how you referenced Brown (who was 39 when he came to NY), Vasquez (career NLer who is average anyway), and Pavano (who was constantly hurt) to make your point. So you just go ahead and use your bogus arbitrary analysis to come to your conclusions about a pitcher and i'll use mine.
 
Originally Posted by venom lyrix

People need to forget about Grienke, just stop. He is not a big game pitcher, he won't survive in New York, forget it...let him go else where. It will never work here.

Soria on the other hand would be awesome since we will probably lose Wood, have Soria step in to the 8th inning role and take over for Mo in 2 yrs
basically. and yanks are on his no trade list.
 
Originally Posted by venom lyrix

People need to forget about Grienke, just stop. He is not a big game pitcher, he won't survive in New York, forget it...let him go else where. It will never work here.

Soria on the other hand would be awesome since we will probably lose Wood, have Soria step in to the 8th inning role and take over for Mo in 2 yrs
basically. and yanks are on his no trade list.
 
Originally Posted by Essential1

Originally Posted by abovelegit1

Originally Posted by Essential1

Yankeephan87 wrote:


Now with Grienke... It depends what the Royals want.. They want a lot of prospects.. HELL NO.. AT best he will be a #4 starter.. No need to unload prospects for a #4... 


Originally Posted by codex57
LOL wut. Greinke would have the best stuff out of anyone in that rotation, including C.C and Cliff (provided they sign him). On what planet would Zack Greinke be considered a number 4?
That anxiety stuff is way overblown, as is ridiculous notion that he would fail completely in New York. His issues with it were 4 years ago, around 2006, and since then he has shown he is a top flight starting pitcher in the majors. I don't care if it's Boston or New York, a mid 90s fastball with movement, power slider, and late-breaking curve will play anywhere.
except in Kansas City where he's had 1 great year, and 5 mediocre/ terrible years...

And I will take Hughes and Pettitte (especially Pettitte) any day of the week over him..  And I'll take C.C. and Cliff Lee (EASILY) over Greinke..

Selling him like he is Kevin Brown, Javi Vasquez, or Carl Pavano... Oh Wait, those guys were can't miss either..


Greinke > anyone on our staff man don't kid yourself 
30t6p3b.gif



only person you could argue about is Cliff Lee and we don't have him yet.
 
Originally Posted by Essential1

Originally Posted by abovelegit1

Originally Posted by Essential1

Yankeephan87 wrote:


Now with Grienke... It depends what the Royals want.. They want a lot of prospects.. HELL NO.. AT best he will be a #4 starter.. No need to unload prospects for a #4... 


Originally Posted by codex57
LOL wut. Greinke would have the best stuff out of anyone in that rotation, including C.C and Cliff (provided they sign him). On what planet would Zack Greinke be considered a number 4?
That anxiety stuff is way overblown, as is ridiculous notion that he would fail completely in New York. His issues with it were 4 years ago, around 2006, and since then he has shown he is a top flight starting pitcher in the majors. I don't care if it's Boston or New York, a mid 90s fastball with movement, power slider, and late-breaking curve will play anywhere.
except in Kansas City where he's had 1 great year, and 5 mediocre/ terrible years...

And I will take Hughes and Pettitte (especially Pettitte) any day of the week over him..  And I'll take C.C. and Cliff Lee (EASILY) over Greinke..

Selling him like he is Kevin Brown, Javi Vasquez, or Carl Pavano... Oh Wait, those guys were can't miss either..


Greinke > anyone on our staff man don't kid yourself 
30t6p3b.gif



only person you could argue about is Cliff Lee and we don't have him yet.
 
Originally Posted by abovelegit1

That anxiety stuff is way overblown, as is ridiculous notion that he would fail completely in New York. His issues with it were 4 years ago, around 2006, and since then he has shown he is a top flight starting pitcher in the majors. I don't care if it's Boston or New York, a mid 90s fastball with movement, power slider, and late-breaking curve will play anywhere.
LOL wut. Greinke would have the best stuff out of anyone in that rotation, including C.C and Cliff (provided they sign him). On what planet would Zack Greinke be considered a number 4?except in Kansas City where he's had 1 great year, and 5 mediocre/ terrible years...

And I will take Hughes and Pettitte (especially Pettitte) any day of the week over him..  And I'll take C.C. and Cliff Lee (EASILY) over Greinke..

Selling him like he is Kevin Brown, Javi Vasquez, or Carl Pavano... Oh Wait, those guys were can't miss either..


You sir, have no idea what you're talking about. I'm sure you looked at his ERA last year, and came to a few idiotic conclusions, namely that he had a terrible year last year, or that he is somehow an inferior pitcher to Andy Pettitte or Phil Hughes (which is laughable BTW). The fact is that he has been a stud pitcher for 3 consecutive years, and that his performance last season was not close to what his ERA suggests. 
His FIP (fielding independent pitching) was 3.34 last season, ahead of the likes of Clay Bucholz, David Price, and yes C.C Sabathia. Not only that, but his calculated Wins above replacement (all inclusive metric that calculates a player's value over a replacement player) was 5.2, above guys like Kershaw, Lincecum, and again Sabathia. I like how you referenced Brown (who was 39 when he came to NY), Vasquez (career NLer who is average anyway), and Pavano (who was constantly hurt) to make your point. So you just go ahead and use your bogus arbitrary analysis to come to your conclusions about a pitcher and i'll use mine.

WHIP up, H/9 up, HR/9 up, BB/9 up, SO/9 down..Earned Runs doubled. ERA doubled...

But let me guess you will blame it on the team right?  A 65 win Royals team in 09... to a 67 win Royals team in 10... Who scored a similar amount of runs, within 10 runs that season
.
Now did you see C.C. WAR it was 5.2 by the way...  Greinke's  2.4.. Pettitte 3.1  (maybe you should double check that).. Or are you talking about 09 when he pitched well....  Even Phil Hughes had a better WAR in 2010...

Stop the god damn crying Greinke so far is a 1 year pitcher..
moz-screenshot-1.png
moz-screenshot-2.png

If you are basing how great he is off one year, I would seriously like you to consider looking at all the other pitchers in the history of baseball who were one year pitchers..


In 2010 Greinke got 2 less games of 0-2 runs than in 2009...  4 more games of 3-5runs...  2 less games of 6+ runs..

In 09 when 3-5 runs 6-3 ... In 2010: 5-6
In 09 when 0-2 runs 3-5 ......In 2010: 1-7



Maybe you can blame the fielding for Kansas City
2009: .981 fielding % T-3rd worst
2010: .980 fielding % 6th worst


Maybe it's their hitting?  Nope .016 better... Literally the second highest BA in the majors.  14th best OBP (12 spots better from 09)

Yes it is not Greinke's fault you must understand he's a stud.. Because he's had one great year on a bad team.. When he has a bad year it is the team's fault..  
 
Originally Posted by abovelegit1

That anxiety stuff is way overblown, as is ridiculous notion that he would fail completely in New York. His issues with it were 4 years ago, around 2006, and since then he has shown he is a top flight starting pitcher in the majors. I don't care if it's Boston or New York, a mid 90s fastball with movement, power slider, and late-breaking curve will play anywhere.
LOL wut. Greinke would have the best stuff out of anyone in that rotation, including C.C and Cliff (provided they sign him). On what planet would Zack Greinke be considered a number 4?except in Kansas City where he's had 1 great year, and 5 mediocre/ terrible years...

And I will take Hughes and Pettitte (especially Pettitte) any day of the week over him..  And I'll take C.C. and Cliff Lee (EASILY) over Greinke..

Selling him like he is Kevin Brown, Javi Vasquez, or Carl Pavano... Oh Wait, those guys were can't miss either..


You sir, have no idea what you're talking about. I'm sure you looked at his ERA last year, and came to a few idiotic conclusions, namely that he had a terrible year last year, or that he is somehow an inferior pitcher to Andy Pettitte or Phil Hughes (which is laughable BTW). The fact is that he has been a stud pitcher for 3 consecutive years, and that his performance last season was not close to what his ERA suggests. 
His FIP (fielding independent pitching) was 3.34 last season, ahead of the likes of Clay Bucholz, David Price, and yes C.C Sabathia. Not only that, but his calculated Wins above replacement (all inclusive metric that calculates a player's value over a replacement player) was 5.2, above guys like Kershaw, Lincecum, and again Sabathia. I like how you referenced Brown (who was 39 when he came to NY), Vasquez (career NLer who is average anyway), and Pavano (who was constantly hurt) to make your point. So you just go ahead and use your bogus arbitrary analysis to come to your conclusions about a pitcher and i'll use mine.

WHIP up, H/9 up, HR/9 up, BB/9 up, SO/9 down..Earned Runs doubled. ERA doubled...

But let me guess you will blame it on the team right?  A 65 win Royals team in 09... to a 67 win Royals team in 10... Who scored a similar amount of runs, within 10 runs that season
.
Now did you see C.C. WAR it was 5.2 by the way...  Greinke's  2.4.. Pettitte 3.1  (maybe you should double check that).. Or are you talking about 09 when he pitched well....  Even Phil Hughes had a better WAR in 2010...

Stop the god damn crying Greinke so far is a 1 year pitcher..
moz-screenshot-1.png
moz-screenshot-2.png

If you are basing how great he is off one year, I would seriously like you to consider looking at all the other pitchers in the history of baseball who were one year pitchers..


In 2010 Greinke got 2 less games of 0-2 runs than in 2009...  4 more games of 3-5runs...  2 less games of 6+ runs..

In 09 when 3-5 runs 6-3 ... In 2010: 5-6
In 09 when 0-2 runs 3-5 ......In 2010: 1-7



Maybe you can blame the fielding for Kansas City
2009: .981 fielding % T-3rd worst
2010: .980 fielding % 6th worst


Maybe it's their hitting?  Nope .016 better... Literally the second highest BA in the majors.  14th best OBP (12 spots better from 09)

Yes it is not Greinke's fault you must understand he's a stud.. Because he's had one great year on a bad team.. When he has a bad year it is the team's fault..  
 
I don't know *** you're looking at but here is the link:

http://www.fangraphs.com/...;season=2010&month=0

As you can clearly see from the link provided, Greinke has been a stud pitcher for three years, and has significantly outperformed the Yankee ace the last two seasons.

I'm sorry but your evaluation/analysis of Greinke is just laughable...he pitched well last year, but you look at his ~4 ERA and decide he was terrible. Obviously his surface numbers regressed from 2009, his season that year was among the best from the past 25 years. And fielding %? Seriously? FIP is the metric that measures a pitchers performance independent of the team's defense, not fielding %. It's because of people like you that Derek Jeter wins gold gloves...
indifferent.gif
 Just take your L, and move on.
 
I don't know *** you're looking at but here is the link:

http://www.fangraphs.com/...;season=2010&month=0

As you can clearly see from the link provided, Greinke has been a stud pitcher for three years, and has significantly outperformed the Yankee ace the last two seasons.

I'm sorry but your evaluation/analysis of Greinke is just laughable...he pitched well last year, but you look at his ~4 ERA and decide he was terrible. Obviously his surface numbers regressed from 2009, his season that year was among the best from the past 25 years. And fielding %? Seriously? FIP is the metric that measures a pitchers performance independent of the team's defense, not fielding %. It's because of people like you that Derek Jeter wins gold gloves...
indifferent.gif
 Just take your L, and move on.
 
The two methods of calculating WAR is the same, except that they account for defense differently.

Still, even if you use Baseball-Ref, Zack Greinke's last two seasons total WAR> Any Yankee starter's last two seasons total WAR
And if you use fangraphs, it's not even close.
 
The two methods of calculating WAR is the same, except that they account for defense differently.

Still, even if you use Baseball-Ref, Zack Greinke's last two seasons total WAR> Any Yankee starter's last two seasons total WAR
And if you use fangraphs, it's not even close.
 
Back
Top Bottom