- 86
- 10
The blue/orange ones are much brighter than what the pictures depict.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As always, thanks for the info Jeff. I only wanted to know from now to the 2009 but i didnt specify and i dont mind lol.Originally Posted by jeffgdula
2009 > 2012 > 2011 > 2010 > 360 (2006) > 360 II (2007) > 360 III (200Originally Posted by andfattoo
Originally Posted by jeffgdula
just picked up the white/blues at lunch. Comfy.
Also just ordered the gray/purples on ndc.
what is your ranking compared to the other recent models?
but the gap between the 2009 and 2012 is the closest in my book.
The 2009s are iconic, very comfy, had some great CWs and were on iD
The 2012s have some nice colorblocking, compelling CWs at release and would have been great on iD
The 2011s had some nice GR CWs but could've used some more color options on iD
The 2010s were very under-rated IMO. Not nearly enough CWs and they were pretty comfy if you went up .5 size
The original 360s were comfy, but could've used more CWs
The 360 IIs had nice colorblocking, but not enough nice CWs
The 360 IIIs were just weird. Not comfy, very weird CWs and it was hard to make them look nice even on iD
As always, thanks for the info Jeff. I only wanted to know from now to the 2009 but i didnt specify and i dont mind lol.Originally Posted by jeffgdula
2009 > 2012 > 2011 > 2010 > 360 (2006) > 360 II (2007) > 360 III (200Originally Posted by andfattoo
Originally Posted by jeffgdula
just picked up the white/blues at lunch. Comfy.
Also just ordered the gray/purples on ndc.
what is your ranking compared to the other recent models?
but the gap between the 2009 and 2012 is the closest in my book.
The 2009s are iconic, very comfy, had some great CWs and were on iD
The 2012s have some nice colorblocking, compelling CWs at release and would have been great on iD
The 2011s had some nice GR CWs but could've used some more color options on iD
The 2010s were very under-rated IMO. Not nearly enough CWs and they were pretty comfy if you went up .5 size
The original 360s were comfy, but could've used more CWs
The 360 IIs had nice colorblocking, but not enough nice CWs
The 360 IIIs were just weird. Not comfy, very weird CWs and it was hard to make them look nice even on iD
thanks for the picOriginally Posted by us3Less
hi everyone,
just wanted to post a picture of how the LAF Air Max+ 2012 shoes look like. sorry for no tags... i haven't been on NT for a long, long time since LeBron 8s, hah!
the yellow looks a lot better in person than the pictures previously shown... hope this helps!
thanks for the picOriginally Posted by us3Less
hi everyone,
just wanted to post a picture of how the LAF Air Max+ 2012 shoes look like. sorry for no tags... i haven't been on NT for a long, long time since LeBron 8s, hah!
the yellow looks a lot better in person than the pictures previously shown... hope this helps!
the blue on the outsole is definitely royal, unless i'm color blind. on the upper, it's more aqua-+%* or something. box says 'blue spark.'Originally Posted by jeffgdula
Originally Posted by CscottJMP
Hey Jeff, if you get a chance think you could post some actual pics of the white/blue CW?
Curious to see how close it matches up to Royal/UK blue.
Thanks
Only ones I have now are camera phone pics. It is more of a Mavs blue than a true royal/UK blue.
the blue on the outsole is definitely royal, unless i'm color blind. on the upper, it's more aqua-+%* or something. box says 'blue spark.'Originally Posted by jeffgdula
Originally Posted by CscottJMP
Hey Jeff, if you get a chance think you could post some actual pics of the white/blue CW?
Curious to see how close it matches up to Royal/UK blue.
Thanks
Only ones I have now are camera phone pics. It is more of a Mavs blue than a true royal/UK blue.
Originally Posted by CscottJMP
These fit true to size like 09 and 11's or half size up like 2010's?