OFFICIAL: NIKE ZOOM KOBE VII THREAD (ELITE $200!: CounterKicks.com)

[oathlok]

yeah im not paying 180 for the inlines or del sols, both colorways are not attractive and no tongue? nah, gotta wait till february for the ones with tongue

 

[swsh]

 at all yapping and whining about VII getting no tongue, y u no wait for the regulars? 
the list indicates that only 2 supremes (at least for now) will be released and the rest will be the regulars and elites that i believe will have that regular tongue.

 

[swsh]

 at all yapping and whining about VII getting no tongue, y u no wait for the regulars? 
the list indicates that only 2 supremes (at least for now) will be released and the rest will be the regulars and elites that i believe will have that regular tongue.

 

[xsalvioutlawx]

From a performance standpoint, these shoes appear to have a lot of features that many people wanted.

Seems like most people are just complaining about the strap.

If the regular versions come with a normal tongue like the samples, than I'm guessing everything will be fine since that seems to be 99% of the complaints.

Personally, these look like performance beasts to me. I am not ready!

 

[xsalvioutlawx]

From a performance standpoint, these shoes appear to have a lot of features that many people wanted.

Seems like most people are just complaining about the strap.

If the regular versions come with a normal tongue like the samples, than I'm guessing everything will be fine since that seems to be 99% of the complaints.

Personally, these look like performance beasts to me. I am not ready!

 

[mastergrim8]

The traction pattern looks spotty. Hopefully it holds up well, even though the geometric pattern leaves me puzzled. No traction pattern has matched the 4s, my personal favorite.

 

[mastergrim8]

The traction pattern looks spotty. Hopefully it holds up well, even though the geometric pattern leaves me puzzled. No traction pattern has matched the 4s, my personal favorite.

 

[dalilboy]

loving the inlines but the del sols have too much white imo

 

[dalilboy]

loving the inlines but the del sols have too much white imo

 

[oreomamba21]

Originally Posted by SWSH

 at all yapping and whining about VII getting no tongue, y u no wait for the regulars? 
the list indicates that only 2 supremes (at least for now) will be released and the rest will be the regulars and elites that i believe will have that regular tongue.

Del Sols and Inlines should be a regular version not a supreme. 

 

[oreomamba21]

Originally Posted by SWSH

 at all yapping and whining about VII getting no tongue, y u no wait for the regulars? 
the list indicates that only 2 supremes (at least for now) will be released and the rest will be the regulars and elites that i believe will have that regular tongue.

Del Sols and Inlines should be a regular version not a supreme. 

 

[la kb24]

whats looks wrong of the pictures with the sleeve out is that the person is wearing no socks


i know it wrongt that there is no tongue but if you put on some white or black socks i think it would look good

 

[la kb24]

whats looks wrong of the pictures with the sleeve out is that the person is wearing no socks


i know it wrongt that there is no tongue but if you put on some white or black socks i think it would look good

 

[dfabix]

Originally Posted by LA KB24

whats looks wrong of the pictures with the sleeve out is that the person is wearing no socks


i know it wrongt that there is no tongue but if you put on some white or black socks i think it would look good

it might look "okay" but it WILL NOT feel good....having laces rest up on the top of your foot? #justsaying

 

[dfabix]

Originally Posted by LA KB24

whats looks wrong of the pictures with the sleeve out is that the person is wearing no socks


i know it wrongt that there is no tongue but if you put on some white or black socks i think it would look good

it might look "okay" but it WILL NOT feel good....having laces rest up on the top of your foot? #justsaying

 

[scottiepimpin33]

smh at dudes getting offended because another dude doesnt like a shoe and vice versa. this is a forum to speak your mind...so feel free to speak it either way.

 

[scottiepimpin33]

smh at dudes getting offended because another dude doesnt like a shoe and vice versa. this is a forum to speak your mind...so feel free to speak it either way.

 

[in transit]

Originally Posted by RustyShackleford

Originally Posted by In Transit

Originally Posted by kobeoverbron

this is what people said about the ZK6.
and please, stop whining about the visible
flywire.

You may not be aware of it, but in our great country, we have something called this,

[h1]Freedom of speech in the United States[/h1]
Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and by many state constitutions and state and federal laws, with the exception of obscenity, defamation, incitement to riot, and fighting words,[sup][1][/sup] as well as harassment, privileged communications, trade secrets, classified material, copyright, patents, military conduct, commercial speech such as advertising, and time, place and manner restrictions.

Criticism of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy, such as racism, sexism, and other hate speech are almost always permitted. There are exceptions to these general protections, including the Miller test for obscenity, child pornography laws, speech that incites imminent lawless action, and regulation of commercial speech such as advertising. Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as rights for authors and inventors over their works and discoveries (copyright and patent), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons (restrictions on fighting words), or the use of untruths to harm others (slander). Distinctions are often made between speech and other acts which may have symbolic significance.

Flag desecration has continually, albeit controversially, been protected by the First Amendment, despite state laws to the contrary. A Constitutional Amendment has been introduced to contravene the First Amendment's protection on flag burning, but it has failed to acquire the requisite enactment by all the states.

Despite the exceptions, the legal protections of the First Amendment are some of the broadest of any industrialized nation, and remain a critical, and occasionally controversial, component of American jurisprudence.
_
Perhaps you may want to understand that we have certain freedoms, that many other places cannot afford.

You are welcome.

You have no idea how freedom of speech works. 

According to who?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States

Come back when you are finished. 

Originally Posted by MoreUptempo

[h1]^^This

[/h1]

when cats try hard to sound intelligent online

You can go and read that as well.

 

[in transit]

Originally Posted by RustyShackleford

Originally Posted by In Transit

Originally Posted by kobeoverbron

this is what people said about the ZK6.
and please, stop whining about the visible
flywire.

You may not be aware of it, but in our great country, we have something called this,

[h1]Freedom of speech in the United States[/h1]
Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and by many state constitutions and state and federal laws, with the exception of obscenity, defamation, incitement to riot, and fighting words,[sup][1][/sup] as well as harassment, privileged communications, trade secrets, classified material, copyright, patents, military conduct, commercial speech such as advertising, and time, place and manner restrictions.

Criticism of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy, such as racism, sexism, and other hate speech are almost always permitted. There are exceptions to these general protections, including the Miller test for obscenity, child pornography laws, speech that incites imminent lawless action, and regulation of commercial speech such as advertising. Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as rights for authors and inventors over their works and discoveries (copyright and patent), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons (restrictions on fighting words), or the use of untruths to harm others (slander). Distinctions are often made between speech and other acts which may have symbolic significance.

Flag desecration has continually, albeit controversially, been protected by the First Amendment, despite state laws to the contrary. A Constitutional Amendment has been introduced to contravene the First Amendment's protection on flag burning, but it has failed to acquire the requisite enactment by all the states.

Despite the exceptions, the legal protections of the First Amendment are some of the broadest of any industrialized nation, and remain a critical, and occasionally controversial, component of American jurisprudence.
_
Perhaps you may want to understand that we have certain freedoms, that many other places cannot afford.

You are welcome.

You have no idea how freedom of speech works. 

According to who?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States

Come back when you are finished. 

Originally Posted by MoreUptempo

[h1]^^This

[/h1]

when cats try hard to sound intelligent online

You can go and read that as well.

 

[in transit]

With great regret, I bring this. 

http://counterkicks.com/2011/10/14/...de-of-the-new-kobe-vii-some-guy-demonstrates/
[h2]Wondering What Feet Look Like Outside The Inside Of The New Kobe VII? Some Guy Demonstrates.[/h2]
Category : Nike

Tags: Kobe 7, Kobe Bryant, Kobe Bryant Shoes, Kobe VII, Nike, Nike Zoom Kobe 7, Nike Zoom Kobe VII, Some Guy, Zoom Kobe 7, Zoom Kobe VII

Never nude.

If you decide to go drop $180 on the new Nike Zoom Kobe VII later this year, here’s a preview of what your feet can expect.

The higher priced “Supreme

 

[in transit]

With great regret, I bring this. 

http://counterkicks.com/2011/10/14/...de-of-the-new-kobe-vii-some-guy-demonstrates/
[h2]Wondering What Feet Look Like Outside The Inside Of The New Kobe VII? Some Guy Demonstrates.[/h2]
Category : Nike

Tags: Kobe 7, Kobe Bryant, Kobe Bryant Shoes, Kobe VII, Nike, Nike Zoom Kobe 7, Nike Zoom Kobe VII, Some Guy, Zoom Kobe 7, Zoom Kobe VII

Never nude.

If you decide to go drop $180 on the new Nike Zoom Kobe VII later this year, here’s a preview of what your feet can expect.

The higher priced “Supreme

 

[Bert.]

SMH i cant buy the concords without the ankle sleeve? im really mad right now SMH

 

[swooshallday]

waiting for "the full test report"...

 

[RustyShackleford]

Originally Posted by In Transit

Originally Posted by RustyShackleford

Originally Posted by In Transit


You may not be aware of it, but in our great country, we have something called this,

[h1]Freedom of speech in the United States[/h1]
Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and by many state constitutions and state and federal laws, with the exception of obscenity, defamation, incitement to riot, and fighting words,[sup][1][/sup] as well as harassment, privileged communications, trade secrets, classified material, copyright, patents, military conduct, commercial speech such as advertising, and time, place and manner restrictions.

Criticism of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy, such as racism, sexism, and other hate speech are almost always permitted. There are exceptions to these general protections, including the Miller test for obscenity, child pornography laws, speech that incites imminent lawless action, and regulation of commercial speech such as advertising. Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as rights for authors and inventors over their works and discoveries (copyright and patent), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons (restrictions on fighting words), or the use of untruths to harm others (slander). Distinctions are often made between speech and other acts which may have symbolic significance.

Flag desecration has continually, albeit controversially, been protected by the First Amendment, despite state laws to the contrary. A Constitutional Amendment has been introduced to contravene the First Amendment's protection on flag burning, but it has failed to acquire the requisite enactment by all the states.

Despite the exceptions, the legal protections of the First Amendment are some of the broadest of any industrialized nation, and remain a critical, and occasionally controversial, component of American jurisprudence.
_
Perhaps you may want to understand that we have certain freedoms, that many other places cannot afford.

You are welcome.

You have no idea how freedom of speech works. 

According to who?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States

Come back when you are finished. 

Brah it a protect freedom against government censorship. Unless dude was acting as a agent of the government and trying to stop you from speaking your mind then your first amendment rights were not being violated. 
Every citizen as the right to say whatever they want to say (with a few exception) without government censorship. You are two private citizens having a disagreement, he can tell you to shut the !@+# up all day, he still isn't violating your freedom of speech.  You just made yourself look stupid, twice 

 

[rzac30]

Originally Posted by RustyShackleford

Originally Posted by In Transit

Originally Posted by RustyShackleford

You have no idea how freedom of speech works. 

According to who?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States

Come back when you are finished. 

Brah it a protect freedom against government censorship. Unless dude was acting as a agent of the government and trying to stop you from speaking your mind then your first amendment rights were not being violated. 
Every citizen as the right to say whatever they want to say (with a few exception) without government censorship. You are two private citizens having a disagreement, he can tell you to shut the !@+# up all day, he still isn't violating your freedom of speech.  You just made yourself look stupid, twice 

Can't really trust your source either...lol