- 7,636
- 13,506
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2012
We gunna lose
seeesh, if you grossed 80k last year as a single filer. You prolly live in major cities. Cause living in FL making 80k a year is considered balling for some folks lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
We gunna lose
seeesh, if you grossed 80k last year as a single filer. You prolly live in major cities. Cause living in FL making 80k a year is considered balling for some folks lol
I read the article already, that is why I made said it doesn't back up your previous point. I am just saying generally you should link your sources.lol I don't need to redeem anything, it's a free country yall can be mad or annoyed by my opinions
they don't require redemption.
here you go.
there are conclusions that can be drawn from this...what conclusions i guess is in the eye of the beholder.
I read the article already, that is why I made said it doesn't back up your previous point. I am just saying generally you should link your sources.
Pretty sure people were not only by your opinions. You keep thinking it is, even though numerous people have pointed out that was not the only thing. But do you.
And you are right, no one has to try and redeem themselves for being an *** on NT. Folk will just remember buffoonery
Anyway, your first take was about the "defund the police" messaging cost the Dems the election. On that point, you admitting it was probably too early to make that call and would wait until more data comes in.
That is was started your month-long **** show. Before the "defund the police" is dumb because it a bad way to reform policing. It was it is dumb because it cost Dems the election. You conceded you jumped the gun on the election. Then you transition to the other ****.
So now a data point comes it, I am saying it redeems your election argument because it fixes the main fault your acknowledged with that claim you made, that at the time it was conjecture. No matter if what you said or acted, that you know think you have evidence backing up your original point.
You think Shor back up your claim, but he really doesn't.
When Levitz follows up he kinda handwaves the question and theorizes some point about white liberals and the saliency of "defund the police", but the study he points to actually undercuts his point about views on crime. In fact it says the opposite.
I know it is a free country, and I am free to be annoyed by your hot takes that you don't have evidence to back it up.
Where did I lie?
i mean all i can say is that's an interesting version of reality you've constructed.
let's hope it's real.
Where did I lie?
i'm not gonna argue about this because there is simply too much distance between you and i on this subject.
i think just about everything you said in there is totally wrong.
no point in going round and round.
let's just hope you're right about all this.
No show us proof it is responsible for the Dems underperformance in the 2020 election.
obviously I don't have definitive proof of that,
it's possible that the polls were always wrong, and that Dems didn't so much under perform as much as they were only up by 3-4 points to begin with.
I think the fact that Trump was able to overperform in majority Latino districts, especially a long the boarder where many Latino's work for immigration and law enforcement
and he seems to have improved his margins in some majority black districts.
I would guess that "Defund the Police" was unhelpful.
I can't say for certain,
but I think in general irrespective of the specifics of the 2020 election
it's bad process to use unpopular slogans that confuse or radicalize people against you.
Economy-focused voters like Trump
Shor said you can see his theory playing out during the election. But at that time, Biden had higher polling on criminal justice and Trump's strength was supposedly with the economy.In Equis’s polling, a key driver of the Hispanic gender gap is that Latinos were much more likely than Latinas to express worry about the economy relative to worry about getting sick.
Equis Research
Trump’s big remaining hope of winning the election is that surveys show the public still has confidence in his economic management.
A June 30 Pew poll showed Biden with an edge on handling race relations, criminal justice issues, and the public health impact of the coronavirus pandemic. But Trump had a three point edge on making good decisions about economic policy. In the New York Times poll that was overall disastrous for Trump, “his approval rating is still narrowly positive on the issue of the economy, with 50 percent of voters giving him favorable marks compared with 45 percent saying the opposite.”
Trump’s problem is that a clear majority of voters are focused on other things. The exception to that is Latino men, who Trump is ill-positioned to win over due to his positioning of himself as the candidate of white backlash against Latin American immigration. But Trump is currently doing better than expected with this swath of the electorate, pointing to a possible resurgence in the president’s support among older white voters who are a better cultural fit for him but who are currently focused on the threat of the coronavirus.
It seems likely that the shift in the outbreak’s epicenter toward Florida and the Southwest will increase concern about Covid-19 among Latino voters and eliminate Trump’s pocket of strength there. But the larger lesson is not so much about Hispanic voters as the extent to which Biden’s strong standing in the polls is potentially a hostage to the news environment. As long as voters don’t explicitly see economic problems as Trump’s fault, he has hopes for a revival of fortunes.
I don't disagree with this point at all, but using 2009 as the starting point right after the housing collapse is misleading as hell.
Of course you do
Let me prove one of my points real quick...
dacomeup
M Mark Antony
Methodical Management
D deleted
IATT
Nike Jordan
Did Osh make an *** of himself when he was ranting in here for weeks about defunding the police. Or I'm I just operating in an alternative reality?
-Third, when you read the Vox article Shor links to it makes the argument that Economics might be helping Trump.
Shor said you can see his theory playing out during the election. But at that time, Biden had higher polling on criminal justice and Trump's strength was supposedly with the economy.
man look at this??
"online progressives are dislike opinions that run contrary to their own"
if this is the charge
I know what you thinkim not arguing about this on here.
1. no one wants that.
2. im sure you can already probably guess what i think.
i thought the article was interesting tho!
80k doesnt get very far in SoCal as a single filer unless you have VERY MINIMAL debt/bills. If you have a child or pay child suppprt, it’s almost like living in poverty. And yes, I’m speaking from experience
man look at this
Perfect, you think everything I said was wrong. Yet on one point, I can show that I am not the only one that thought that way, and you want to dismiss that.
So a bunch of people agree with something, you disagree, but the group is the one delude operating in an alternative reality, not you.
Amazing.
You just don't get it it was not just your take people had an issue with. Your general behavior, constant hypocrisy were pissing people off.
But you were and are still up your own *** about this that you think it is just about 'Online progressive can't handle my reality-based take"
That is not it dude.
Could say that for every major city on the west coast. $1,400 is one mortgage payment for me.
I know what you think
No matter if you don't have a data point, or no matter if the evidence you present doesn't back up that point, in the end, it still confirm your priors
The end
I blocked that joker because of those stupid
-Of course you do
Let me prove one of my points real quick...
dacomeup
M Mark Antony
Methodical Management
D deleted
IATT
Nike Jordan
Comparison Ford
Did Osh make an *** of himself when he was ranting in here for weeks about defunding the police. Or I'm I just operating in an alternative reality?
-Also....
Your response. this you right?...
-Third, when you read the Vox article Shor links to it makes the argument that Economics might be helping Trump.
Shor said you can see his theory playing out during the election. But at that time, Biden had higher polling on criminal justice and Trump's strength was supposedly with the economy.