***Official Political Discussion Thread***

This is a blatant lie. Every economist that looks into Trump's plans say he will explode the national debt

Stop saying this
But Ninja linked one pro-Trump economist once 
eyes.gif
 
I might be speaking nonsense here, but I think right now would be the best opportunity for a 3rd party to make themselves more legitimate. Not saying they'll be serious contenders in 2020 but they could be stirring the pot at the state and local level. The trust and faith in the dominated 2 party system is at it's weakest we've seen in our lifetimes and then some. I'm interested to see how this all plays out after the inauguration, that's when the hangover should subside.

We have to remember the Reform Party

Ross Peridot established the Reform Party, got enough votes to get them federal matching, and the first chance the got the nominated Pat Buchanan and welcome in David Duke. :{

A move that force one moderate businessman to leave the Party after a failed Presidential bid. The name of the moderate business turned off by racism within the party; the one and only Donald Trump. :lol

-The Liberation and Green and loony as hell, any traction they get, they will probably blow it.

Ross Perot gave H.W. fits :lol I just watched a 30 for 30 short bout how he "gave" Clinton the election :lol

But we gotta have more than 2 legitimate parties, hell, even an Independent party, even though it's an oxymoron

more parties sounds like the answer, but just look at how the teaparty (and ultimately the repubs) did this country.

NOTHING would get done with majority rules in congress and the senate, we would never get any law passed.

We seen that with Obama's presidency.
 
True. But he's left himself a little wiggle room with the final sentence: "solely on the basis of WikiLeaks"

Once a story drops he could easily say he heard it on the news. I think he's saying that his oppo team won't release anything that they find of WikiLeaks but if other people share the information then it's public domain.
 
i guess ur fine with anaemic economic growth from da status quo that would certainly continue under a Hillary administration....

I asked for the positives of a trump presidency....

-lower taxes & regulations

-less United states foreign intervention

-a robust energy policy that takes advantage of our vast natural resources, and further secure a independent energy inventory away from da OPEC cartel

-a better chance at actually paying down da 20 Trillion we owe as a Country

-absolutely no TPP free trade deals

-potential term limit laws on congress

-simple tax plan

This is a blatant lie. Nearly every economist that looks into Trump's plans say he will explode the national debt. The links have been provided to you too, so there is no reason for you to be still ignorant on this subject.

Stop saying this, it is not true

its more true than Hillary Clinton, hence da underlined sectioned..
 
The Tax Policy Center, Penn's Wharton School of Economics, Cambridge Economics, Wall St Journal, Moody's Analytics, & a host of other reliable groups/think tanks have all said chubby aka male sarah palin's economic & tax plans would be disaster & increase the US debt. There isn't a remote chance he based on what he's proposed that could lend itself to "a better chance".
 
Last edited:
So Detroit st Louis and Philadelphia gonna have voter fraud according to trump


So black cities are gonna cheat


Foh
 
i guess ur fine with anaemic economic growth from da status quo that would certainly continue under a Hillary administration....

I asked for the positives of a trump presidency....

-lower taxes & regulations

-less United states foreign intervention

-a robust energy policy that takes advantage of our vast natural resources, and further secure a independent energy inventory away from da OPEC cartel

-a better chance at actually paying down da 20 Trillion we owe as a Country

-absolutely no TPP free trade deals

-potential term limit laws on congress

-simple tax plan

This is a blatant lie. Nearly every economist that looks into Trump's plans say he will explode the national debt. The links have been provided to you too, so there is no reason for you to be still ignorant on this subject.

Stop saying this, it is not true

its more true than Hillary Clinton, hence da underlined sectioned..

No, it won't be. That is another lie
 
So Detroit st Louis and Philadelphia gonna have voter fraud according to trump


So black cities are gonna cheat


Foh

But...but...voter suppression and gerrymandering, and black people don't have IDs because the DMV closes too early. Surely that's enough to disenfranchise black voters.
 
Last edited:
The Tax Policy Center, Penn's Wharton School of Economics, Cambridge Economics, Wall St Journal, Moody's Analytics, & a host of other reliable groups/think tanks have all said chubby aka male sarah palin's economic & tax plans would be disaster & increase the US debt. There isn't a remote chance he based on what he's proposed that could lend itself to "a better chance".

Hillary is gonna JACK UP spending(which is gonna raise taxes), so compared to her? there's a better chance.
 
Last edited:
So Detroit st Louis and Philadelphia gonna have voter fraud according to trump


So black cities are gonna cheat


Foh

But...but...voter suppression and gerrymandering. Surely that's enough to disenfranchise black voters.

Reacho, wtf are you even trying to say.

Because the other stuff happen, liberals shouldn't complain about voter intimidation :{ :lol

Brah, i can hear the tap shoes from here. Stop
 
So Detroit st Louis and Philadelphia gonna have voter fraud according to trump


So black cities are gonna cheat


Foh

But...but...voter suppression and gerrymandering. Surely that's enough to disenfranchise black voters.

Reacho, wtf are you even trying to say.

Because the other stuff happen, liberals shouldn't complain about voter intimidation :{ :lol

Brah, i can hear the tap shoes from here. Stop

Dang it, and I thought if anyone had an idea of what dude was tryna say it'd be u Rusty
 
The Tax Policy Center, Penn's Wharton School of Economics, Cambridge Economics, Wall St Journal, Moody's Analytics, & a host of other reliable groups/think tanks have all said chubby aka male sarah palin's economic & tax plans would be disaster & increase the US debt. There isn't a remote chance he based on what he's proposed that could lend itself to "a better chance".

Hillary is gonna JACK UP spending, so compared to her? there's a better chance.

No there isn't. You think you're using common sense, in in fact you're just showing you don't know basic economics again.

Trump will cut government revenue, Hillary will increase it. Trump's tax cuts are bigger than Hillary's spending increases, they will cost the country more. Trump will have to cut government by an insane amount to even have a chance at making his pan neutral. That is why Trump's plan is worst and gives us a worst chance of being able to decrease the deficit and pay back the debt (if Trump would even choose to).

-BTW, unless the economy has a MASSIVE permanent shock, like say the internet, we are not looking at having a chance on paying back the debt anytime soon.

Bush Jr.'s tax cuts really screwed us
 
Last edited:
i guess ur fine with anaemic economic growth from da status quo that would certainly continue under a Hillary administration....

I asked for the positives of a trump presidency....

-lower taxes & regulations

-less United states foreign intervention

-a robust energy policy that takes advantage of our vast natural resources, and further secure a independent energy inventory away from da OPEC cartel

-a better chance at actually paying down da 20 Trillion we owe as a Country

-absolutely no TPP free trade deals

-potential term limit laws on congress

-simple tax plan

This is a blatant lie. Nearly every economist that looks into Trump's plans say he will explode the national debt. The links have been provided to you too, so there is no reason for you to be still ignorant on this subject.

Stop saying this, it is not true

its more true than Hillary Clinton, hence da underlined sectioned..

No, it won't be. That is another lie

Hillary is jacking up spending and raising taxes..yes it will be better than her policy

we're at a spending deficit now, she's more status quo and a step further.
 
i guess ur fine with anaemic economic growth from da status quo that would certainly continue under a Hillary administration....

I asked for the positives of a trump presidency....

-lower taxes & regulations

-less United states foreign intervention

-a robust energy policy that takes advantage of our vast natural resources, and further secure a independent energy inventory away from da OPEC cartel

-a better chance at actually paying down da 20 Trillion we owe as a Country

-absolutely no TPP free trade deals

-potential term limit laws on congress

-simple tax plan

This is a blatant lie. Nearly every economist that looks into Trump's plans say he will explode the national debt. The links have been provided to you too, so there is no reason for you to be still ignorant on this subject.

Stop saying this, it is not true

its more true than Hillary Clinton, hence da underlined sectioned..

No, it won't be. That is another lie

Hillary is jacking up spending and raising taxes..yes it will be better than her policy

we're at a spending deficit now, she's more status quo and a step further.

You don't understand basic economics.
 
But...but...voter suppression and gerrymandering, and black people don't have IDs because the DMV closes too early. Surely that's enough to disenfranchise black voters.

What are you talking about

I'm saying your candidate is claiming on black cities.are subject to suspect voting practices.

Like they have in the past


His message is saying that trust the white cities
 
Back
Top Bottom