- Oct 14, 2008
- 13,904
- 13,337
Those 38 nays need to have all their electronics and their family investigated. Something is fishy about voting against something like this.
***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
- Jan 16, 2011
- 14,973
- 36,340
Conservatives catching up
- Oct 28, 2013
- 42,734
- 178,535
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,221
- 202,656
- Jan 12, 2013
- 26,837
- 38,456
Doesn’t necessarily mean he’s not gay or bi but how did this guy evade scrutiny for so long? Damn near everything about him is fake.
It’ll never cease to baffle me how some people can just make up an entire resume, backstory, … and succeed for so long.
Completely unrelated but it reminds me of one of the main conspirators in Logan Paul’s latest “Cryptozoo” NFT scam, Eddie Ibanez.
Turns out Ibanez’ whole identity and resume was all fabricated, and powerful people around him all bought into it. Supposed MIT graduate, supposed CIA career, supposed NFL data scientist who helped win the Super Bowl, supposed orphan, …
All fake, yet people like an NFL owner and numerous other wealthy businessmen were conned by a resume that already sounds ridiculous on paper.
To be fair, this Congressman’s resume doesn’t ring any alarm bells on paper but it’s not hard to verify these things.
- Sep 28, 2020
- 1,395
- 2,978
This is what kills me. Anyone who gets a job at my bank has to supply a resume -no gaps- that HR verified via vendors. It’s a couple hundred dollars per person.
Why is this not standard practice for anyone running for national office? 538 x 10 candidates per race x $1000 is nothing.
Or why aren’t the xNCs just doing it themselves? Wait for the generals and it’s 538 x 1000.
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,221
- 202,656
- Jan 12, 2013
- 26,837
- 38,456
Tbh the verification process at my employer (market-leading HR Software company) wasn’t very strict either but I imagine big banks take more care.
I put some security exploit reports on my resume that I was asked about but I was never asked to submit any communications despite mentioning emails.
Good that they didn’t though, my emails with Twitch are more of a bribe (on both ends) than a traditional bug bounty
- Oct 14, 2008
- 13,904
- 13,337
Banks in general do more due diligence on employees because you’re handling lots of cash, or are a custodian with access to large cash movements, or making decisions in the millions of dollars trading etc. they do credit checks and all. Working at a large accounting firm like I do, it’s the same thing.
- Dec 15, 2017
- 17,811
- 43,327
Bruhhh the fact it’s Trump should’ve been enough to justify the need for him to be audited into oblivion regardless if he’s a sitting president or not.
Dude’s scammer since birth so idk why these QOPs are outraged viewing this as some sort of “precedent” or “political attack.”
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,221
- 202,656
- Sep 28, 2020
- 1,395
- 2,978
In some cases there’s regulatory and statutory “guidance” as well. But that’s kind of my point… for Congress, nothing.
I’d never advocate everyone adopting our standards, but vetting a candidate for the Senate is probably a bigger deal than doing so for some analyst clerking in accounts payable.
I put some security exploit reports on my resume that I was asked about but I was never asked to submit any communications despite mentioning emails.
Good that they didn’t though, my emails with Twitch are more of a bribe (on both ends) than a traditional bug bounty
In another life, you would probably be a great person to know….
- Sep 6, 2022
- 1,267
- 4,344
- Jan 12, 2013
- 26,837
- 38,456
They definitely just wanted her to tell the truth, right guys.
I'm sure the job offer right afterwards was completely unrelated
I'm sure the job offer right afterwards was completely unrelated
Nike Jordan
Supporter
- Jun 27, 2002
- 33,958
- 81,260
It's almost 2023.
Liberals or left-leaning types aren't dating redhats/Republicans.
- Jan 16, 2011
- 14,973
- 36,340
There's no fire without smoke.
I wouldn't be surprised that suspicions were raised about Santos' background within the extended circle he had to be part of in order to run, but more influential people who wanted him elected chose to look the other way until after the elections.
And when it comes to media digging into and publishing stories they're not supposed to, Trump showed how to keep things from the public eye until after the story loses significance.
- Jan 11, 2014
- 8,617
- 17,196
- Jul 15, 2018
- 2,996
- 7,850
- Apr 30, 2010
- 69,674
- 106,314
Well at least the GOP arranged him a girl so he's not on the streets being a menace.
- Jul 15, 2018
- 2,996
- 7,850
- Jan 12, 2013
- 26,837
- 38,456
Who could’ve seen this coming
- Mar 25, 2021
- 9,639
- 20,765
- Apr 30, 2010
- 69,674
- 106,314
How weak.
- Aug 20, 2001
- 29,035
- 64,023
This is damn near abuse of power. I have never asked my assistants to do anything personal related because that wouldn’t necessarily be unethical but it was not what they signed up for. The job description didn’t read “Order my wife flowers and schedule my spa day.” Also, they are lowkey some of the best resources available because they literally know everything about the person or group they are responsible for. A little charm and some flowers, chocolates, a pastry, etc. can go a long way in gaining access to information. Or they can expose you like in Krysten Sinema’s case
elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,403
- 195,815
NY Times Pitchbot is gonna be out of a job soon
Similar threads
