***Official Political Discussion Thread***

[IATT]

dwalk31

 

[wavycrocket]

dwalk31

Is this one of da cyber ninjas?

I wonder if ninjahood was one of those too. Would make perfect sense

Cyber Ninjas, firm that conducted Arizona election ‘audit’, shuts down | US elections 2020 | The Guardian

Company has failed to comply with court order to turn over public documents from review beset by shoddy working and infighting

amp.theguardian.com

Court records show Cyber Ninjas' CEO Doug Logan is 'Individual 25' in Georgia's Trump indictment

Logan, best known for leading the Arizona Senate's discredited "audit" of Maricopa County's 2020 election results, was not charged with a crime.

www.azcentral.com

 

[IATT]

 

[DLF]

 

[wavycrocket]

No coincidence you post RBN, right after Greenwald

About the guy you just posted (RBN). He originally was a grifter, who used the name “Fred Hampton Leftist”. The actual Fred Hampton Jr saw all this dudes bull**** posts, and contestant lying and cozying up to white supremacist…that he issued a cease and desist letter to the dude to stop using his father/family name.





And now, he has to grift under “Revolutionary Black Network”. He’s a Trump supporter who grew his online presence through Jimmy Dore/Greenwald/Briahana Joy Gray etc.

He’s also another Russian propagandist too. But I’m sure you know that. These things aren’t coincidence

 

[Mark Antony]

Got to be clear this dude only wants the attention at this point. Nothing about his post history before finding this thread would say this is a serious person.

 

[moonman818]

Is DLF posting from Russia?

He doesn’t even post like the same dude from the Laker thread.

 

[Cashflow]

 

[RustyShackleford]

The Supreme Court will probably overturn that decision

 

[mplsdunk]

About damn time, gonna put a lot of pressure on the rtw states contractors.

Go union or miss out on all this government

 

[letsgetit22]

The Supreme Court will probably overturn that decision

Legit question... how can the us supreme court overturn a state supreme court if the decision of the state isn't federal?

 

[biggie62]

Legit question... how can the us supreme court overturn a state supreme court if the decision of the state isn't federal?

Federal rules can overturn and overrule state specific rules. Nothing new.

 

[letsgetit22]

Federal rules can overturn and overrule state specific rules. Nothing new.

But isn't that only when a state goes against a federal law that the entire country has to abide by?

 

[biggie62]

But isn't that only when a state goes against a federal law that the entire country has to abide by?

Not necessarily. It’s just about what makes it to the Supreme Court to making w ruling on it.

 

[letsgetit22]

The federal issue will be the interpretation of the 14th amendment. Cool, got it.

 

[TooOlfForThisIsh]

The law will be interesting, at least. Would love to hear a lawyer (constitutional!) opine, but my understanding is that usually appeal can’t re-litigate findings of fact. So there would have to be a different angle if you take for “fact” that his activity on 1/6 was insurrection.

 

[jpzx]

The Supreme Court will probably overturn that decision

Was tried in Minnesota. SC will overturn like you said but damn didn’t really think this was going to pass in any state.

 

[lazybread]

The federal issue will be the interpretation of the 14th amendment. Cool, got it.

The US supreme court always interprets issues of the US constitution. It never matters if its a state or federal law that’s in question, both are bound by the US constitution and are therefore under the jurisdiction of the US supreme court.

 

[IATT]

 

[letsgetit22]

So I guess my question wasn't ridiculous

 

[stuntman mike]

 

[rexanglorum]

Very likely that SCOTUS overturns or throws it out or voids it some other way.

But I think it’s possible that SCOTUS hangs him out to dry. Other than Clearance Thomas, I don’t think any of the Republican appointees have any relationship with Trump, they are t MAGA. So I think it’s possible that keep Trump of the ballot.

The conservative justices are political actors but I think they may decide that their political project of conservative minority rule through gerrymandering, voter suppression, and lawfare is better served by a GOP without Trump. They are also banking on the idea that even with big majorities, the Dems simply cannot get the 60 votes needed to pack/rebalance the federal courts.

I hope that no matter what they decide it blows up in their faces. But as we already saw in 2020, SCOTUS isn’t an automatic supporter of Donald Trump. Which is genuinely funny because he nominated one third of that court.

 

[jpzx]

Very likely that SCOTUS overturns or throws it out or voids it some other way.

But I think it’s possible that SCOTUS hangs him out to dry. Other than Clearance Thomas, I don’t think any of the Republican appointees have any relationship with Trump, they are t MAGA. So I think it’s possible that keep Trump of the ballot.

The conservative justices are political actors but I think they may decide that their political project of conservative minority rule through gerrymandering, voter suppression, and lawfare is better served by a GOP without Trump. They are also banking on the idea that even with big majorities, the Dems simply cannot get the 60 votes needed to pack/rebalance the federal courts.

I hope that no matter what they decide it blows up in their faces. But as we already saw in 2020, SCOTUS isn’t an automatic supporter of Donald Trump. Which is genuinely funny because he nominated one third of that court.

Zero ****ing way Coney or Kavanaugh or any of these people overrule him. You gotta be kidding.

 

[jpzx]

I mean, you gotta be kidding thinking there's even a chance of that.

 

[rexanglorum]

They’ll probably invent some reason to keep him on the ballot, sure. But the court didn’t bail him out in 2020 so I’m not sure why you’re so confident they’ll bail him out now. I’m curious to see your reasoning on this.