***Official Political Discussion Thread***

At the end of the day if Shillary gets in she'll have no political capital after fighting all this through the primary and general. No mandate and battered and bruised. Wonderful.
 
I suppose I see it kinda like Freud's pyramid of human needs:




I view Trump's collection of misdeeds (jeopardizing the needs listed higher on the pyramid) as less of an immediate threat than Hillary's collection of misdeeds (jeopardizing the needs listed lower on the pyramid). Not negligible / excusable, but relatively less dangerous than Hillary's.

Trump groping someone doesn't quite have the same potential worst case scenario consequences for our country as Hillary e-mailing classified government information via a vulnerable home network.

Am I crazy, dumb, or does anyone else see where I'm coming from?

Like, it's the collective feelings of an uber-PC society vs. threat to national security.
You're purposely or dumbfoundingly ignoring a lot about the 2 candidates to reach those conclusions when we're talking about the person who will be running the executive branch, representing this country, and leading the free world for the next 4 years.

I really don't know what happened but this is some twilight zone **** the way ppl can talk themselves into rationalizing voting for Donald. When did you lower your standards? Or did you simply never have any and that's being shown with the clown that's the Republican nominee?

At the end of the day if Shillary gets in she'll have no political capital after fighting all this through the primary and general. No mandate and battered and bruised. Wonderful.
Already prepping your stance after the election night L I see.
 
Last edited:
I suppose I see it kinda like Freud's pyramid of human needs:




I view Trump's collection of misdeeds (jeopardizing the needs listed higher on the pyramid) as less of an immediate threat than Hillary's collection of misdeeds (jeopardizing the needs listed lower on the pyramid). Not negligible / excusable, but relatively less dangerous than Hillary's.

Trump groping someone doesn't quite have the same potential worst case scenario consequences for our country as Hillary e-mailing classified government information via a vulnerable home network.

Am I crazy, dumb, or does anyone else see where I'm coming from?

Like, it's the collective feelings of an uber-PC society vs. threat to national security.

way to confuse maslow with Freud.

stay in school, kid.
 
Last edited:
WaPo/ABC showed Clinton's lead erroding 8 points in 4 days...either that poll was rigged and she was never up that high and/or da wikileaks is doing da death by 1000 cuts status.

having a FBI probe over her neck & constant Wikileaks dumps daily is doing justice
smokin.gif
roll.gif
roll.gif


bruh you just said a couple of days ago that the race was tied according to that one poll you kept linking.

now all of a sudden hillary's lead is erroding 8 points lmaoooo

how do you go from saying these polls arent legitimate to using them in your argument?
 
Nice try what? They were obviously harrasing the woman. Listen to the camera person and the guy in the vid threatening her. I saw another video of even more harassment, can't find it though.



And her sign said F Mexico, not Mexicans. You can never believe regressives.

700


People are disgusting.

Do these people not ever deal with the homeless?
 
man, you know what?


it's not even worth it.


(this is the first time i've ever done this)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
you're not supposed to enrich yourself when you run a charity... period.

meanwhile, donald trump paid his son's boyscouts fee of 7 dollars via the trump foundation.


literally.


the level of denial these trump voters have talked themselves into....




there is literally nothing you can criticize hilary for that donald isn't MUCH worse in....

lmao @ jail her.

donald trump has been doing illegal **** for 35 years.....and STILL would have made more return on his daddy's cash investment had he left it in a savings account at a local bank.


who opens a casino then needs his daddy to donate 3 million dollars to it, illegally?

WHO DOES THAT?


better question

who votes for someone who does that, because, somehow, they've talked themselves into an alternate reality where that is an accomplishment, let alone acceptable?

then again, this is the level of thinking of people who are proud of burning coal for heat in 2016.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
you're not supposed to enrich yourself when you run a charity... period.

meanwhile, donald trump paid his son's boyscouts fee of 7 dollars via the trump foundation.


literally.


the level of denial these trump voters have talked themselves into....




there is literally nothing you can criticize hilary for that donald isn't MUCH worse in....

lmao @ jail her.

donald trump has been doing illegal **** for 35 years.....and STILL would have made more return on his daddy's cash investment had he left it in a savings account at a local bank.


who opens a casino then needs his daddy to donate 3 million dollars to it, illegally?

WHO DOES THAT?


better question

who votes for someone who does that, because, somehow, they've talked themselves into an alternate reality where that is an accomplishment, let alone acceptable?

then again, this is the level of thinking of people who are proud of burning coal for heat in 2016.

For any normal person this would be ether but ninja will just skim over this, pick something to respond to and then go on a tangent.
 
:rollin :rollin

bruh you just said a couple of days ago that the race was tied according to that one poll you kept linking.

now all of a sudden hillary's lead is erroding 8 points lmaoooo

how do you go from saying these polls arent legitimate to using them in your argument?

im talking about this WaPo poll explicitly now.

her lead did erode 8 points in 4 days, so my comment stands, either this poll was rigged and it was ALOT closer in reality, or it wasn't at she has lost support precipitously...and seeing this week's turn of events, its definitely both.
 
you're not supposed to enrich yourself when you run a charity... period.

meanwhile, donald trump paid his son's boyscouts fee of 7 dollars via the trump foundation.


literally.


the level of denial these trump voters have talked themselves into....




there is literally nothing you can criticize hilary for that donald isn't MUCH worse in....

lmao @ jail her.

donald trump has been doing illegal **** for 35 years.....and STILL would have made more return on his daddy's cash investment had he left it in a savings account at a local bank.


who opens a casino then needs his daddy to donate 3 million dollars to it, illegally?

WHO DOES THAT?


better question

who votes for someone who does that, because, somehow, they've talked themselves into an alternate reality where that is an accomplishment, let alone acceptable?

then again, this is the level of thinking of people who are proud of burning coal for heat in 2016.

For any normal person this would be ether but ninja will just skim over this, pick something to respond to and then go on a tangent.

except there is blatant quid pro quo unethical tactics as shown thru da wikileaks documents.

how did da Clintons become filthy rich running a charity? its called selling access.
 
im talking about this WaPo poll explicitly now.

her lead did erode 8 points in 4 days, so my comment stands, either this poll was rigged and it was ALOT closer in reality, or it wasn't at she has lost support precipitously...and seeing this week's turn of events, its definitely both.


ei·ther
ˈēT͟Hər,ˈīT͟Hər/Submit
conjunction & adverb
1.
used before the first of two (or occasionally more) alternatives that are being specified (the other being introduced by “or”).
"either I'll accompany you to your room, or I'll wait here"
2.
used to indicate a similarity or link with a statement just made.
"you don't like him, do you? I don't, either"
determiner & pronoun
1.
one or the other of two people or things.
"there were no children of either marriage"


or1
ôr/Submit
conjunction
1.
used to link alternatives.
"a cup of tea or coffee"
2.
introducing a synonym or explanation of a preceding word or phrase.
"the espionage novel, or, as it is known in the trade, the thriller"
nounELECTRONICS
1.
a Boolean operator that gives the value one if at least one operand (or input) has a value of one, and otherwise has a value of zero.



it's EITHER one OR the other, but, in the minds of people who have convinced themselves voting for trump is decent, it's BOTH....at the same time.
 
except there is blatant quid pro quo unethical tactics as shown thru da wikileaks documents.

how did da Clintons become filthy rich running a charity? its called selling access.


DONALD TRUMP DID THE SAME THING, JUST NOT AS RESPECTABLE.

LMAO @ a donald trump supporter bringing up ETHICS.


how do you bring up ETHICS then foo foo trump criticisms as "too PC"?


alternate reality.


you live in an alternate reality where a clown like trump could make america great "again"

where hilary making money speaking is unethical but donald trump making money speaking is genius.

where hilary "getting rich" while the face of a foundation is illegal, but trump "getting rich" while the face of a foundation is business savvy.

where hilary e-mails are more embarrassing than sexual assault and mocking the disabled.

where being a state senator and secretary of state is a mark against the candidate but turning daddy's loans (through every loophole known to man) into a moderate investment (with daddy's help) is a strong endorsement.

where a businessman sinks a made-up school into the hole (then files for bankruptcy) and is called successful.

where knowing what the **** you're talking about is optional.

and last but not least...

you all live in an alternate reality where you're okay with a 70 year old man CONSTANTLY talking about ******* his daughter......

like....constantly.
 
DONALD TRUMP DID THE SAME THING, JUST NOT AS RESPECTABLE

so selling access to da US government is "more respectable"? :{ :lol

da Clinton Foundation sold access for profit, even Chelsea Clinton couldn't cosign da filth.. she's da one that called a audit by a non partisan group and they found conflicts of interests mountains high, she was called a spoil brat for her troubles :lol.
 
At the end of the day if Shillary gets in she'll have no political capital after fighting all this through the primary and general. No mandate and battered and bruised. Wonderful.
Political capital isn't a real thing, like the Easter Bunny.
 
so selling access to da US government is "more respectable"? :{ :lol

da Clinton Foundation sold access for profit, even Chelsea Clinton couldn't cosign da filth.. she's da one that called a audit by a non partisan group and they found conflicts of interests mountains high, she was called a spoil brat for her troubles :lol.

no, being the secretary of state while promoting a foundation you "get rich" off of is more respectable than making up a college (which failed) and selling steaks while promoting a foundation you 'get rich" off of.......follow along, ninjahood....this is simple text.




and that all sounds good.....

until you're only arguing it in defense of the ethics of donald trump...



it's SO UNETHICAL of hilary.....





YET


something

deep

down

tells

me

it

would

be

business

savvy

had

donald

"sold"

the

same

"access"

(lol, he would have to succeed at something first.)

donald will sell you access to his daughter right now.

he's not only the president, he's a client.

LMAO



(also, an replaces a when it's followed by a word that begins with a vowel....but that maybe too PC for trump supporters, too.)



it's funny how trump supporters want to separate the two candidates to criticize hilary.....


like...

"she's unethical"


but you're voting for donald trump...LMAO

"she was mean to the women who accused her husband of sexual harrassment!"

but donald trump is mean to all women who aren't white and anorexic......all while sexually harassing them...

"she was getting money personally from her foundation"

donald trump paid a 7 dollar boyscouts of america fee with a check from his foundation....he also makes (his only) donations to other foundations with his foundation...LMAO he's donating money people donated to him.



is hilary a great candidate? no.


is donald trump even a mediocre candidate? that's disrespectful to mediocre candidates.

will hilary do a better job in elected office than donald trump? well, she can read, for one thing......
 
Da Donald donated $200,000 to the Clinton Foundation. How does Ninjahood feel about that? :lol

he also has a child rape case...among others.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html


before you discredit it, i don't even read the huffington post....and i know yall don't read period, but make an exception.....\


this is his chester rapist friend.

Jeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953) is an American financier.[1] He worked at Bear Stearns early in his career and subsequently formed his own firm, J. Epstein & Co. In 2008 Epstein was convicted of soliciting an underage girl for prostitution and given an 18-month prison sentence, of which he served 13 months.[2] He is a registered level three sex offender.[3]


so at the very least, even if the accusations are false, he kicked it with a level 3 child rapist....registered. LMAO

but hilary deleted emails.

LMAO

ALTERNATE

REALITY
 
Back
Top Bottom