- 9,253
- 3,007
At the end of the day if Shillary gets in she'll have no political capital after fighting all this through the primary and general. No mandate and battered and bruised. Wonderful.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're purposely or dumbfoundingly ignoring a lot about the 2 candidates to reach those conclusions when we're talking about the person who will be running the executive branch, representing this country, and leading the free world for the next 4 years.I suppose I see it kinda like Freud's pyramid of human needs:
I view Trump's collection of misdeeds (jeopardizing the needs listed higher on the pyramid) as less of an immediate threat than Hillary's collection of misdeeds (jeopardizing the needs listed lower on the pyramid). Not negligible / excusable, but relatively less dangerous than Hillary's.
Trump groping someone doesn't quite have the same potential worst case scenario consequences for our country as Hillary e-mailing classified government information via a vulnerable home network.
Am I crazy, dumb, or does anyone else see where I'm coming from?
Like, it's the collective feelings of an uber-PC society vs. threat to national security.
Already prepping your stance after the election night L I see.At the end of the day if Shillary gets in she'll have no political capital after fighting all this through the primary and general. No mandate and battered and bruised. Wonderful.
At the end of the day if Shillary gets in she'll have no political capital after fighting all this through the primary and general. No mandate and battered and bruised. Wonderful.
I suppose I see it kinda like Freud's pyramid of human needs:
I view Trump's collection of misdeeds (jeopardizing the needs listed higher on the pyramid) as less of an immediate threat than Hillary's collection of misdeeds (jeopardizing the needs listed lower on the pyramid). Not negligible / excusable, but relatively less dangerous than Hillary's.
Trump groping someone doesn't quite have the same potential worst case scenario consequences for our country as Hillary e-mailing classified government information via a vulnerable home network.
Am I crazy, dumb, or does anyone else see where I'm coming from?
Like, it's the collective feelings of an uber-PC society vs. threat to national security.
And Reacho comes of of hiding as well.
WaPo/ABC showed Clinton's lead erroding 8 points in 4 days...either that poll was rigged and she was never up that high and/or da wikileaks is doing da death by 1000 cuts status.
having a FBI probe over her neck & constant Wikileaks dumps daily is doing justice
Nice try what? They were obviously harrasing the woman. Listen to the camera person and the guy in the vid threatening her. I saw another video of even more harassment, can't find it though.
And her sign said F Mexico, not Mexicans. You can never believe regressives.
And Reacho comes of of hiding as well.
Not hiding. There just wasn't anything note worthy happening, until this new FBI finding.
Wow Freud
you're not supposed to enrich yourself when you run a charity... period.
you're not supposed to enrich yourself when you run a charity... period.
meanwhile, donald trump paid his son's boyscouts fee of 7 dollars via the trump foundation.
literally.
the level of denial these trump voters have talked themselves into....
there is literally nothing you can criticize hilary for that donald isn't MUCH worse in....
lmao @ jail her.
donald trump has been doing illegal **** for 35 years.....and STILL would have made more return on his daddy's cash investment had he left it in a savings account at a local bank.
who opens a casino then needs his daddy to donate 3 million dollars to it, illegally?
WHO DOES THAT?
better question
who votes for someone who does that, because, somehow, they've talked themselves into an alternate reality where that is an accomplishment, let alone acceptable?
then again, this is the level of thinking of people who are proud of burning coal for heat in 2016.
bruh you just said a couple of days ago that the race was tied according to that one poll you kept linking.
now all of a sudden hillary's lead is erroding 8 points lmaoooo
how do you go from saying these polls arent legitimate to using them in your argument?
you're not supposed to enrich yourself when you run a charity... period.
meanwhile, donald trump paid his son's boyscouts fee of 7 dollars via the trump foundation.
literally.
the level of denial these trump voters have talked themselves into....
there is literally nothing you can criticize hilary for that donald isn't MUCH worse in....
lmao @ jail her.
donald trump has been doing illegal **** for 35 years.....and STILL would have made more return on his daddy's cash investment had he left it in a savings account at a local bank.
who opens a casino then needs his daddy to donate 3 million dollars to it, illegally?
WHO DOES THAT?
better question
who votes for someone who does that, because, somehow, they've talked themselves into an alternate reality where that is an accomplishment, let alone acceptable?
then again, this is the level of thinking of people who are proud of burning coal for heat in 2016.
For any normal person this would be ether but ninja will just skim over this, pick something to respond to and then go on a tangent.
im talking about this WaPo poll explicitly now.
her lead did erode 8 points in 4 days, so my comment stands, either this poll was rigged and it was ALOT closer in reality, or it wasn't at she has lost support precipitously...and seeing this week's turn of events, its definitely both.
except there is blatant quid pro quo unethical tactics as shown thru da wikileaks documents.
how did da Clintons become filthy rich running a charity? its called selling access.
DONALD TRUMP DID THE SAME THING, JUST NOT AS RESPECTABLE
Political capital isn't a real thing, like the Easter Bunny.At the end of the day if Shillary gets in she'll have no political capital after fighting all this through the primary and general. No mandate and battered and bruised. Wonderful.
so selling access to da US government is "more respectable"?
da Clinton Foundation sold access for profit, even Chelsea Clinton couldn't cosign da filth.. she's da one that called a audit by a non partisan group and they found conflicts of interests mountains high, she was called a spoil brat for her troubles .
Da Donald donated $200,000 to the Clinton Foundation. How does Ninjahood feel about that?
Jeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953) is an American financier.[1] He worked at Bear Stearns early in his career and subsequently formed his own firm, J. Epstein & Co. In 2008 Epstein was convicted of soliciting an underage girl for prostitution and given an 18-month prison sentence, of which he served 13 months.[2] He is a registered level three sex offender.[3]