- 26,133
- 23,096
You may be right. I'm not disagreeing, but I’m trying to highlight that these are significant talking points. Navigating them can be challenging, and perhaps the most strategic approach is to handle certain progressive stances quietly, without overt publicity—almost like the "under-the-radar" approach we’ve seen on some policies. Alternatively, there’s the approach of someone like JD Vance, who leaned fully into themes of religious and family values, which clearly resonated and may have contributed to a shift in voting patterns.Honestly, I’m not sure how the left even maneuvers around LGBTQ-phobia in communities like these.
Religious and cultural issues like these can’t really be transcended by modern politics since there is nothing a politician can say/do to make a community like this more tolerant. They probably just have to focus on issues that they would resonate more with such as immigration reform (since a lot of this same group feels it is fair that illegal immigrants get citizenship privilege while they had to wait their term before coming to the US for legal status).
Perhaps factors like Kamala Harris being a woman played a role in public reception; it’s possible some segments of the electorate weren’t ready for that. These are all crucial considerations when nominating a candidate, as these major talking points clearly resonate and require thoughtful engagement.