***Official Political Discussion Thread***

Bro, what even is the end game here? It’s like people bought into a narrative that doesn’t add up, thinking there’s some magic cure for inflation. Spoiler alert: there isn’t. And all this "bring jobs back to America" talk? Sure, sounds great on a bumper sticker, but in reality, it just means pricier products for everyone. The wild part is, it’s not just Dems—it’s the majority of voters on both sides who are about to feel the pain. All bets are off, and we’re all left holding the bag.

And the rednecks without a pot to piss in are about to find out the hard way that voting for billionaires to "fix things" doesn’t exactly trickle down to fixing their problems. That rude awakening? Yeah, it’s coming, and it’s gonna hit like a freight train and broken promises.
And they’ll STILL be too ******* stupid to admit their mistakes…those idiots are all about their “Pride” and ****…they are ******* dumb to the end. You have no idea how dumb the average peckerwood is.
 
Executive Orders (EOs) are tools for interpreting and enforcing existing laws, or for exercising executive authority within the bounds of the law. However, actions such as altering birthright citizenship, which directly conflict with the Constitution, have faced legal challenges. For instance, a judge intervened and temporarily blocked such an effort, highlighting the constitutional limits on executive authority.
In theory you could try to challenge basically everything as long as you're willing to throw money down the drain and find a willing judge. The Texas' Attorney General's habit of challenging almost anything Biden tried to implement is probably the best example of this.
Even if the challenge is completely frivolous and the challenge ends up going nowhere, the practice of judge-shopping can result in temporary injunctions slowing everything down before a higher court eventually throws it out.

Notice how Texas AG Ken Paxton files many of his legal challenges against the Biden administration in one particular district? Amarillo Texas.
The reason is because filing it there guarantees it ends up on the desk of 1 specific judge.
Amarillo is the most known example for the above reason but I assume most if not all states have some small districts in a remote area where 1 judge gets assigned all the cases there.
 
Last edited:
These MFers are straight-up losing their minds, running the country like it’s some third-world dictatorship or a full-blown communist regime. And this nonsense about trying to squeeze in an extra term because of a “break in service”? What kind of ridiculous loophole gymnastics is that? Seriously, what the hell are we doing here?
The loop hole is designed to keep Obama and Bush W from running against him. It’s not at all constitutional and Trump would have an easier time saying “no more elections” and just starting a civil war than he would have getting a third term.

Notice the person who put that out there is a political nobody. The plan is Trump ruins everything and JD takes over and between sex sessions with his couch he keeps things ruined.

Of all the horrible stuff that happened this week, that is just noise.
 
In theory you could try to challenge basically everything as long as you're willing to throw money down the drain and find a willing judge. The Texas' Attorney General's habit of challenging almost anything Biden tried to implement is probably the best example of this.
Even if the challenge is completely frivolous and the challenge ends up going nowhere, the practice of judge-shopping can result in temporary injunctions slowing everything down before a higher court eventually throws it out.

Notice how Texas AG Ken Paxton files many of his legal challenges against the Biden administration in one particular district? Amarillo Texas.
The reason is because filing it there guarantees it ends up on the desk of 1 specific judge.
Amarillo is the most known example for the above reason but I assume most if not all states have some small districts in a remote area where 1 judge gets assigned all the cases there.
I think the response to all of this will be lawsuits in blue states. Federalism is going to kick in, in a heavy way and we’ll likely see “Blue Oasis” pop up either by individuals states or between states.

We’re seeing the end game of the gutting of the federal government so the wealthy can create fiefdoms in red states. I still think in their hubris they haven’t considered the saying “is it better to rule in hell than serve in heaven”, but lowkey it is what it is.

A lot is riding on the next round of Governor elections. I think they should be blow outs for the democrats, a lot of ticket splitting happened in 2024 and it shows support for democrat ran state governments. However, I also learned people are stupid and easily misled by social media so maybe they will be led to blame the democrats for **** outside of their control…. Again.
 
A lot is riding on the next round of Governor elections. I think they should be blow outs for the democrats, a lot of ticket splitting happened in 2024 and it shows support for democrat ran state governments. However, I also learned people are stupid and easily misled by social media so maybe they will be led to blame the democrats for **** outside of their control…. Again.
It should be, but who knows? The way Trump came in and signed many of his promises into action on day one resonated with people who were never directly affected by the policies. There should be significant resentment from the federal workforce, but it’s hard to say—many federal employees weren’t working remotely and might see this situation differently. People can be predictably unpredictable in their reactions.
 


Expose and depose America’s welfare Kings.

If Asian people keep embarrassing da culturally inferior tech whites, Vivek might get kicked out of the Ohio Republican party before he gets a chance to run for governor.

Siri might even start sounding like a Reddit poster and start calling him Visa Ramaswamy too.
 
Last edited:


Bruh, even Homer never got barred from parent-teacher night. :lol:

He aligns perfectly with the narrative and campaign Vance ran, which framed people without children as Americans without a stake in the country. The implication is that because this individual has numerous children, he’s inherently “for the American people.” DEI, on the other hand, was a framework designed to counteract such exclusionary perspectives, promoting fairness and ensuring that qualified minorities had equitable access to opportunities in the workplace. Thus, creating a roadblock for this kind of BS.
 


Bruh, even Homer never got barred from parent-teacher night. :lol:

I just read that this individual was appointed through a tie-breaking vote cast by Vice President Vance. In other words, even some Republicans opposed his appointment. This is particularly concerning given that previous appointees, including those nominated by Trump, received overwhelming bipartisan support.

51-50
 
1737862580528.png


trup proposing ethnically cleansing Gaza.

will we see any pro Palestine protests in response or that only for democrats?🤔
 
The richest and now most powerful man in the world is an actual Nazi.


And he's not even German lmaooo Germans gotta stand and and say hop off our nuts, you wasn't with us shootin in the gym..

He's a regular run of the mill south African apartheid chump.

Like dude is really just a whole loser in real life that just happened to get rich. Just a poser for likes. His autism is poisonous.
 
1737862580528.png


trup proposing ethnically cleansing Gaza.

will we see any pro Palestine protests in response or that only for democrats?🤔


Starting at 3:45

Never forget, this was what Trumps openly Zionist supporting son-in-law was pushing prior to the election. I am assuming after that they repeat this in the West Bank.
 
Back
Top Bottom