***Official Political Discussion Thread***

That NY times article was fantastic. Im outta reps or it would have caught one early. 

They are literally begging forgiveness on their knees, admitting they got exposed badly and hoping for a fresh start. 
laugh.gif


They know one disparaging remark from da bronze gawd now will have them trading in recyclables for a living.  Ahhh well, you guys are the same ones screaming save the ice caps,  now you can do your part.

If you guys saw how even more left wing wacko and flat out wrong the canadian media has been about this you'd be amazed.   

Someone cue Today by smashing pumpkins 
roll.gif
 
no, cuz no such laws were in Michigan or Pennsylvania... Democrats haven't loss those since da 80's

da time for Democratic self reflection starts now.

There are voter ID laws in Michigan

Michigan has an existing voter ID law that is somewhat flexible, permitting a voter to sign an affidavit and vote a regular ballot if they do not have photographic identification with them. Snyder vetoed a proposal from the Republican-led legislature requiring a photo ID for absentee voting.

Jul 3, 2012

- By law, every Michigan voter must present picture identification at the polls, or sign an affidavit attesting that he or she is not in possession of picture identification. Remember to bring an acceptable form of photo identification to the polls on Election Day. ...

And like NC there were efforts between 2012 and the present to make those ID laws more restrictive by the GOP. Moreover you mentioned Wisconsin as well, I already said Pennsylvania doesn't have any laws.
 
Last edited:
That NY times article was fantastic. Im outta reps or it would have caught one early. 
They are literally begging forgiveness on their knees, admitting they got exposed badly and hoping for a fresh start. :lol
They know one disparaging remark from da bronze gawd now will have them trading in recyclables for a living.  Ahhh well, you guys are the same ones screaming save the ice caps,  now you can do your part.
If you guys saw how even more left wing wacko and flat out wrong the canadian media has been about this you'd be amazed.   
Someone cue Today by smashing pumpkins :rollin

their misery tastes so good..
 
That NY times article was fantastic. Im outta reps or it would have caught one early. 
They are literally begging forgiveness on their knees, admitting they got exposed badly and hoping for a fresh start. :lol
They know one disparaging remark from da bronze gawd now will have them trading in recyclables for a living.  Ahhh well, you guys are the same ones screaming save the ice caps,  now you can do your part.
If you guys saw how even more left wing wacko and flat out wrong the canadian media has been about this you'd be amazed.   
Someone cue Today by smashing pumpkins :rollin

Don't kid yourself. You'll be right there with them.
 
what part of Hillary's needing superdelegates to win isn't true? 8o

because it implies that Bernie wouldn't have needed them to overturn the will of people or that he was some how robbed of something.


Bernie lost, and I'm surprised you of all people would indulge these soft crybaby excuses Bernie stans make for taking an L. :lol
 
Last edited:
no, cuz no such laws were in Michigan or Pennsylvania... Democrats haven't loss those since da 80's

da time for Democratic self reflection starts now.

There are voter ID laws in Michigan

Michigan has an existing voter ID law that is somewhat flexible, permitting a voter to sign an affidavit and vote a regular ballot if they do not have photographic identification with them. Snyder vetoed a proposal from the Republican-led legislature requiring a photo ID for absentee voting.

Jul 3, 2012

- By law, every Michigan voter must present picture identification at the polls, or sign an affidavit attesting that he or she is not in possession of picture identification. Remember to bring an acceptable form of photo identification to the polls on Election Day. ...

And like NC there were efforts between 2012 and the present to make those ID laws more restrictive by the GOP

and you're gonna tell me with a straight face this stopped black folks to go out & vote Hillary ehh? >D :lol
 
Berie fans are a text book example of why so many progressives are losers and choke artists.
 
Last edited:
and you're gonna tell me with a straight face this stopped black folks to go out & vote Hillary ehh? >D :lol

So you not going to even acknowledge that you just lied/gave mis- information? The election is over, no need to deflect. Could it have been a factor sure, it has been in other states with similar laws.
 
what part of Hillary's needing superdelegates to win isn't true? 8o

because it implies that Bernie wouldn't have needed them to overturn the will of people or that he was some how robbed of something.


Bernie lost, and I'm surprised you of all people would indulge these soft crybaby excuses Bernie stans make for taking an L. :lol

he got screwed, wikileaks exposed it.

they got a right to be mad.

and they were forced on a weak bandwagon that collapsed...hey, i can see why they got a issue.
 
and you're gonna tell me with a straight face this stopped black folks to go out & vote Hillary ehh? >D :lol

So you not going to even acknowledge that you just lied/gave mis- information? The election is over, no need to deflect. Could it have been a factor sure, it has been in other states with similar laws.

whats misinformation? a voter affidavit is a vaid vote.

and Pennsylvania? 8o
 
Actually I understand why Ninjahood throws his lot in with crybaby, because it's fun to needle Clinton with "you robbed Bernie". I actually do get it. :lol
 
whats misinformation? a voter affidavit is a vaid vote.

and Pennsylvania? 8o

I'm not going to keep holding your hand, you can read. I'm not addressing Pennsylvania for a 3rd time. Are you going to say anything about Wisconsin though 8o.
 
Last edited:
Obama beat the Clinton machine under far murkier circumstances and progressives didn't complain then.:lol

Instead it was the establishment whining and crying.


losers. the bunch of em.
 
Ok... Keep doubting him.

Pull up all the posts that show my sense of humor if you want. Research me. But you better research Trump too.

Y'all gonna be mad come November. I'm telling you. People have been counting him out for a year now.

Stay stuck on the racist narrative and ignore the fact the he just did a northeast sweep and that he's on track to easily crush the record for most popular votes in a primary. Call me a self-hater and post "**** train" gifs. See where that gets you. And see how much it slows the Trump train.

#yallfinishedoryalldone

He has ZERO chance in the general. Can't win an election when 60% of your own party hates you.

I guess you haven't seen Hillary's negatives :lol

Trump got a REAL good chance to win cuz Clinton is frankly going against something thats never existed in da political arena..we're watching history unfold now.

now serving jumbo humble pie slices..

[emoji]127856[/emoji][emoji]127856[/emoji][emoji]127856[/emoji]
 
Superdelegate voting is the dumbest aspect of the democratic party primaries

It stinks of corruption

sure.


but

call me when they overturn the candidate with more votes.


FYI in 08 you could totally make the argument Clinton had more votes than Obama, and they STILL didn't overturn the delegate leader.. :lol

and that's the "establishment neoliberal crook" Hilary Clinton.


LOSERS.
 
2008 Democratic primary-

Clinton: 17,857,501 (23 contests won)
Obama: 17,584,692 (33 contests won)

Was Hillary robbed?

And that's a 200k vote difference. Bernie lost by 3 MILLION in winning the same amount of states as Hillary did in 2008. Stop whining.
 
Last edited:
Lots of things are dumb,

Electoral college is dumb,

super delgates are dumb

caucuses are dumb.

winner take all delegate allotment is dumb.


as my Nigerian grandma use to say, translates roughly to; "all dogs eat **** but it's the one that catch that you get mad at"



call me when the delgates steal something.
 
Last edited:
That is ridiculous position to have.

Things changed under ever president if you know the issues.

Trump possibly screwing over people is gratifying because you just want to see something pop off.

:{
Things change? Things change you say, but I'm rediculous.
That has to be the most....meh.
Why bother, you just pump the fear bro. Stay trivial.

Yeah just save it. Because I know the weak argument that coming
 
Back
Top Bottom