- 70,049
- 24,223
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2004
400 pairs of worn sneakers
i wish i had time to UNDS all my kicks..still got CDP packs DS
carry on though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
400 pairs of worn sneakers
There have been plenty of ACA alternatives proposed. One of them was opening insurance across state lines in attempt to drive overall costs down because competition would be created. ACA only passed because the Dems controlled the House and Senate at the time. There were no Republicans that voted on it. Hell, no politician even read the bill. Pelosi herself said that we'll have to pass it and see what happens. However, her district was exempt from the ACA and she isn't required to get her insurance from it. Another myth that Obama couldn't get anything done because no one would work with him. The first two years of his presidency were that in which Washington was held firmly by Democrats.
A fact that would only impress a teenage male hypebeast
If you don't like Obamacare that's fine, but you gotta have a response better than just repealing it, because the coal minors in west virginia with black lung who health insurance becasue of ACA won't be happy, and the single mother with a child with a precisting condition won't be happy
these will be easy issues for the Dems to take back the midwest from republicans.
400 pairs of worn sneakers
i wish i had time to UNDS all my kicks..still got CDP packs DS
carry on though.
400 pairs of worn sneakers
i wish i had time to UNDS all my kicks..still got CDP packs DS
carry on though.
So you are holding onto the notion these are good investments still? As if a few of your pairs being DS makes a difference
Way to ignore the rest of my post. I'm sure the truth hurt. You washed fam
There have been plenty of ACA alternatives proposed. One of them was opening insurance across state lines in attempt to drive overall costs down because competition would be created. ACA only passed because the Dems controlled the House and Senate at the time. There were no Republicans that voted on it. Hell, no politician even read the bill. Pelosi herself said that we'll have to pass it and see what happens. However, her district was exempt from the ACA and she isn't required to get her insurance from it. Another myth that Obama couldn't get anything done because no one would work with him. The first two years of his presidency were that in which Washington was held firmly by Democrats.
Dog.
DOG.
Please stop with this. This is not a proposal by itself, to replace obamacare, and would do next to nothing to keep costs down. I've explained why countless times but I will do it again.
It seems like a good idea right? getting rid of imaginary lines right? But it doesn't do anything, now why?
1. Every state has different healthcare regulations and minimum coverage requirements, by allowing states to sell across state lines you would simply create a "Delaware" effect, where insurance providers would all simply move to the state with the laxest insurance regulations.
And it's not even a small government solution because To prevent this you would nee to build a new bureaucracy to regulate healthcare nationally, essentially increasing size of federal goverment.
2. Building insurance networks is hard.
It's not like you can start selling insurance intimidate once you get rid of state liness, you gotta build a coverage networks, gotta make deals with hospitals, doctors and these hospitals and doctors already have deals with entrenched state providers and you gotta comply with state regulations, for insurance providers it's not worth there time.
3. States have tried this and it did nothing.
http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/issue_briefs/2012/rwjf401409
The barrier to entry is not the imaginary lines b.
So for the love of god can we finally move on from this idea, and come up with real Obamacare replace options? :x
Did I say I said that? I said that was an alternative proposed. Don't sit here and attempt to lecture me. Cats get real comfortable behind these computer screens and love talking greasy. Half the **** y'all say wouldn't be said in person. Not a peep. So don't try to patronize other people on here for props.Dog.
DOG.
Please stop with this. This is not a proposal by itself, to replace obamacare, and would do next to nothing to keep costs down. I've explained why countless times but I will do it again.
It seems like a good idea right? getting rid of imaginary lines right? But it doesn't do anything, now why?
1. Every state has different healthcare regulations and minimum coverage requirements, by allowing states to sell across state lines you would simply create a "Delaware" effect, where insurance providers would all simply move to the state with the laxest insurance regulations.
And it's not even a small government solution because To prevent this you would nee to build a new bureaucracy to regulate healthcare nationally, essentially increasing size of federal goverment.
2. Building insurance networks is hard.
It's not like you can start selling insurance intimidate once you get rid of state liness, you gotta build a coverage networks, gotta make deals with hospitals, doctors and these hospitals and doctors already have deals with entrenched state providers and you gotta comply with state regulations, for insurance providers it's not worth there time.
3. States have tried this and it did nothing.
http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/issue_briefs/2012/rwjf401409
The barrier to entry is not the imaginary lines b.
So for the love of god can we finally move on from this idea, and come up with real Obamacare replace options?
Dog.
DOG.
Please stop with this. This is not a proposal by itself, to replace obamacare, and would do next to nothing to keep costs down. I've explained why countless times but I will do it again.
It seems like a good idea right? getting rid of imaginary lines right? But it doesn't do anything, now why?
1. Every state has different healthcare regulations and minimum coverage requirements, by allowing states to sell across state lines you would simply create a "Delaware" effect, where insurance providers would all simply move to the state with the laxest insurance regulations.
And it's not even a small government solution because To prevent this you would nee to build a new bureaucracy to regulate healthcare nationally, essentially increasing size of federal goverment.
2. Building insurance networks is hard.
It's not like you can start selling insurance intimidate once you get rid of state liness, you gotta build a coverage networks, gotta make deals with hospitals, doctors and these hospitals and doctors already have deals with entrenched state providers and you gotta comply with state regulations, for insurance providers it's not worth there time.
3. States have tried this and it did nothing.
http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/issue_briefs/2012/rwjf401409
The barrier to entry is not the imaginary lines b.
So for the love of god can we finally move on from this idea, and come up with real Obamacare replace options? :x
Did I say I said that? I said that was an alternative proposed. Don't sit here and attempt to lecture me. Cats get real comfortable behind these computer screens and love talking greasy. Half the **** y'all say wouldn't be said in person. Not a peep. So don't try to patronize other people on here for props.
I already told your groupie that I'm down to meet in person. Feel free to PM me. I have the whole week off.
Did I say I said that? I said that was an alternative proposed. Don't sit here and attempt to lecture me. Cats get real comfortable behind these computer screens and love talking greasy. Half the **** y'all say wouldn't be said in person. Not a peep. So don't try to patronize other people on here for props.
I already told your groupie that I'm down to meet in person. Feel free to PM me. I have the whole week off.
400 pairs of worn sneakers
i wish i had time to UNDS all my kicks..still got CDP packs DS
carry on though.
So you are holding onto the notion these are good investments still? As if a few of your pairs being DS makes a difference
Way to ignore the rest of my post. I'm sure the truth hurt. You washed fam
i can get MSRP minimum on 99% of kicks i own.
what u talking bout b...im still waiting on where im losing money.
i can get MSRP minimum on 99% of kicks i own.
what u talking bout b...im still waiting on where im losing money.
Selling across state lines can work if regulate if properly at the federal level you bundle a few profitable states with lesser ones.
So companies won't be selling insurance in 50 different states, they would be selling it in 4-15 regions.
Make the healthy states help subsidized the costlier ones.
How did Osh's post lead to death threats? He said absolutely nothing that was insulting
i can get MSRP minimum on 99% of kicks i own.
what u talking bout b...im still waiting on where im losing money.
Time value of money, b
How did Osh's post lead to death threats? He said absolutely nothing that was insulting
Man if he only understood these simple concepts. I'm not even going to attempt to talk to him about compounding. If anything, sneakers are to be used as a short-term investment. He has soles separating from his investments. No one believes the worth of his collection, at least not me.
@Reuters: BREAKING: Law enforcement to block supplies to North Dakota pipeline protesters as winter sets in
Wtf is this inhumane crap?? These dudes having a medieval siege or what?
Now let the Bundy's take over federal land and it's all good and peachy for weeks...
To say that things escalated quickly would be an understatement.How did Osh's post lead to death threats? He said absolutely nothing that was insulting