***Official Political Discussion Thread***

This has been discussed plenty of times. Dude grabs stuff from twitter and over places and just posts it here. He has been upfront about that, multiple times, and he has been doing it for months.

If that bothers you'll so much, then at this point, tough.

what da hell u talking about? :lol get out your MSNBC bubble b.

I got no problem with dude screen capping w/e he wants, all I said is with that particular article, he fumbled and I added to da point black intellect touched upon is that da majority of da public gets its news from FB, knowing how terrible da vetting be there I wasn't surprised one slipped thru da cracks here.
 
This has been discussed plenty of times. Dude grabs stuff from twitter and over places and just posts it here. He has been upfront about that, multiple times, and he has been doing it for months.

If that bothers you'll so much, then at this point, tough.

what da hell u talking about? :lol get out your MSNBC bubble b.

I got no problem with dude screen capping w/e he wants, all I said is with that particular article, he fumbled and I added to da point black intellect touched upon is that da majority of da public gets its news from FB, knowing how terrible da vetting be there I wasn't surprised one slipped thru da cracks here.

WTF are you even rambling about. Dude has specifically said in the past that he doesn't check everything he posted so some stuff might be off. I have brought this up to him, and he has been upfront about it. He doesn't vet everything, he told us this nearly a year ago. So you'll too calling him out as example was pointless.

Plus Your *** doesn't even read the links you post. Sometimes, just miss me wit you **** and shut the hell up. Your damb existence is living in a bubble.
 
400


simpsons-judge.gif

Where is the bigot brigade to ride to their Lord and Savior 8o
 
This has been discussed plenty of times. Dude grabs stuff from twitter and over places and just posts it here. He has been upfront about that, multiple times, and he has been doing it for months.

If that bothers you'll so much, then at this point, tough.

what da hell u talking about? :lol get out your MSNBC bubble b.

I got no problem with dude screen capping w/e he wants, all I said is with that particular article, he fumbled and I added to da point black intellect touched upon is that da majority of da public gets its news from FB, knowing how terrible da vetting be there I wasn't surprised one slipped thru da cracks here.

WTF are you even rambling about. Dude has specifically said in the past that he doesn't check everything he posted so some stuff might be off. I have brought this up to him, and he has been upfront about it. He doesn't vet everything, he told us this nearly a year ago. So you'll too calling him out as example was pointless.

Plus Your *** doesn't even read the links you post. Sometimes, just miss me wit you **** and shut the hell up. Your damb existence is living in a bubble.

***** pls, I got everything right to call out obvious miss reporting (cuz guess what, u wasn't gonna do it) da only person acting like they got a tight thong up they butt about it is you, and I read everything I post, I just don't do da socialist democracy commie liberal interpretation you yearn for :lol
 
This has been discussed plenty of times. Dude grabs stuff from twitter and over places and just posts it here. He has been upfront about that, multiple times, and he has been doing it for months.

If that bothers you'll so much, then at this point, tough.

what da hell u talking about? :lol get out your MSNBC bubble b.

I got no problem with dude screen capping w/e he wants, all I said is with that particular article, he fumbled and I added to da point black intellect touched upon is that da majority of da public gets its news from FB, knowing how terrible da vetting be there I wasn't surprised one slipped thru da cracks here.

WTF are you even rambling about. Dude has specifically said in the past that he doesn't check everything he posted so some stuff might be off. I have brought this up to him, and he has been upfront about it. He doesn't vet everything, he told us this nearly a year ago. So you'll too calling him out as example was pointless.

Plus Your *** doesn't even read the links you post. Sometimes, just miss me wit you **** and shut the hell up. Your damb existence is living in a bubble.

***** pls, I got everything right to call out obvious miss reporting (cuz guess what, u wasn't gonna do it) da only person acting like they got a tight thong up they butt about it is you, and I read everything I post, I just don't do da socialist democracy commie liberal interpretation you yearn for :lol

You can say whatever you want, so can I. I was just pointing something out and you want to make it an issue.

And you don't read ****, you have made yourself look like a clown repeatedly, and you clearly don't have the capacity to stop it from happening again

Go back to economically panhandling for da Hemi money and miss me wit your nonsense.
 
Last edited:
I read everything I post

Anyone who reads this thread knows that's a damn lie lmao

I HIGHLIGHT portions of article to buttress a respective point I made...ya dismiss it till Trump himself does it :lol

perfect example being da 7 Countries under da ban coming from da Obama administration... talking about I ain't read to understand..then da Trump white house makes da SAME exact point :lol
 
Rusty appreciate it.. but you know dude doesn't exist to me

Considering the stuff peddled by his boy and his cronies sources should be the last hill he should be wanting to die upon
 
Take it easy on ninja guys...you know those SNL sketches probably put a dark cloud over his Sundays
 
You can say whatever you want, so can I. I was just pointing something out and you want to make it an issue.

rusty out here acting like salty douche water for absolutely nothing... :lol

no one was talking to ur *** in da first place b. all I said was da supreme Court judge news was fake, and here u go acting like someone owes u da time of day.

Trump winning was my perverbial "wash your face" to you, cuz u was SOOOOOOO sure u was gonna be petty November 8th. :lol
 
I applaud the judicial branch. Without them the US would've been instantly transformed into a dictatorship. They are the only branch of government that is functioning right now.
 
Last edited:
speaking of "hemi panhandling"

Carmakers Would Like Relief from CAFE Mandates, Bigly
The American road of the future could look very much like that of the past.

JAN 2017 BY EDDIE ALTERMAN MULTIPLE PHOTOGRAPHERS
SHARE
TWEET


From the February 2017 issue
We tried to stay above the fray this election cycle. I have rejected, for example, several politically charged story proposals this year, ranging from gold-plating an ’80s limo to road-testing a Subaru in northern Libya. But there is one intersection where cars and politics must collide, and it is at the corner of Energy and Policy.

Already, the Detroit Three have been lobbying the incoming administration to take their industry off the path to the 2025 CAFE regulations. These regs, you’ll remember, mandate a 54.5-mpg average for an auto­maker’s fleet, but the workarounds are already legion. Knowing the new guy’s pro-business proclivities—he’s good at business!—it seems certain that the previous administration’s CAFE plan won’t survive.

What does that mean for cars and light trucks going forward? One facile prediction: After years of engine downsizing, upsizing is going to be a thing.

The V-8 may reemerge as the engine of choice for sports sedans, sports cars, and trucks, and the EVs’ march could stall. The market penetration for pure EVs is barely half a percent now, and that’s with Tesla factored in and California’s thumb on the scale. For EVs to break through, they will need to be legitimately desirable, à la the Model S or Jaguar’s forthcoming I-Pace crossover. Their benefits will have to outweigh the convenience and familiarity of the internal-combustion engine.



But the conditions that got us to the point where EVs are actually lustworthy are a result of the research undertaken when we were said to be at peak oil and electrification was the most plausible way forward. If car and ­battery makers ease off EV R&D now, batteries may never fully pencil against IC engines, and desirable electrics at all price points may never materialize. California and the nine other ZEV states will mandate alt-fuelers, and the rest of the country will drive what it wants.

Barring government intervention or spiking fuel prices, we have shown that we will gravitate to the biggest, safest vehicles available. The American road of the future could look very much like that of the past. The joy that would bring to many of us enthusiasts is tempered by the cessation of big, exciting technological leaps. Back to the future, indeed

http://www.caranddriver.com/columns/carmakers-would-like-relief-from-cafe-mandates-bigly-column

OG muscle car era coming back strong :hat
 
You can say whatever you want, so can I. I was just pointing something out and you want to make it an issue.

rusty out here acting like salty douche water for absolutely nothing... :lol

no one was talking to ur *** in da first place b. all I said was da supreme Court judge news was fake, and here u go acting like someone owes u da time of day.

Trump winning was my perverbial "wash your face" to you, cuz u was SOOOOOOO sure u was gonna be petty November 8th. :lol

You are the one that quoted me Edwin, you could have let me be.

And all you have now is to talk about Liberal reaction to stuff, because your Frot Papi is proving to be the incompetent clown we all said he was.

I can be petty to you whenever I want, Trump proves me right on the daily.
 
speaking of "hemi panhandling"

Carmakers Would Like Relief from CAFE Mandates, Bigly
The American road of the future could look very much like that of the past.

JAN 2017 BY EDDIE ALTERMAN MULTIPLE PHOTOGRAPHERS
SHARE
TWEET


From the February 2017 issue
We tried to stay above the fray this election cycle. I have rejected, for example, several politically charged story proposals this year, ranging from gold-plating an ’80s limo to road-testing a Subaru in northern Libya. But there is one intersection where cars and politics must collide, and it is at the corner of Energy and Policy.

Already, the Detroit Three have been lobbying the incoming administration to take their industry off the path to the 2025 CAFE regulations. These regs, you’ll remember, mandate a 54.5-mpg average for an auto­maker’s fleet, but the workarounds are already legion. Knowing the new guy’s pro-business proclivities—he’s good at business!—it seems certain that the previous administration’s CAFE plan won’t survive.

What does that mean for cars and light trucks going forward? One facile prediction: After years of engine downsizing, upsizing is going to be a thing.

The V-8 may reemerge as the engine of choice for sports sedans, sports cars, and trucks, and the EVs’ march could stall. The market penetration for pure EVs is barely half a percent now, and that’s with Tesla factored in and California’s thumb on the scale. For EVs to break through, they will need to be legitimately desirable, à la the Model S or Jaguar’s forthcoming I-Pace crossover. Their benefits will have to outweigh the convenience and familiarity of the internal-combustion engine.



But the conditions that got us to the point where EVs are actually lustworthy are a result of the research undertaken when we were said to be at peak oil and electrification was the most plausible way forward. If car and ­battery makers ease off EV R&D now, batteries may never fully pencil against IC engines, and desirable electrics at all price points may never materialize. California and the nine other ZEV states will mandate alt-fuelers, and the rest of the country will drive what it wants.

Barring government intervention or spiking fuel prices, we have shown that we will gravitate to the biggest, safest vehicles available. The American road of the future could look very much like that of the past. The joy that would bring to many of us enthusiasts is tempered by the cessation of big, exciting technological leaps. Back to the future, indeed

http://www.caranddriver.com/columns/carmakers-would-like-relief-from-cafe-mandates-bigly-column

OG muscle car era coming back strong :hat

Congrats, now let us hope Papi Trump keeps them broke boy cheap so you can cop in 5-6 years
 
Last edited:
I applaud the judicial branch. Without them the US would've been instantly transformed into a dictatorship. They are the only branch of government that is functioning right now.

u do know eventually all those rullings work their way up to da supreme Court... 8o

that said, ish pretty much overblown. I don't think Obama's Immigration Executive order than was put on ice by a Texas judge got this ammount of media coverage...and had a national declaration for it on TV...
 
speaking of "hemi panhandling"

Carmakers Would Like Relief from CAFE Mandates, Bigly
The American road of the future could look very much like that of the past.

JAN 2017 BY EDDIE ALTERMAN MULTIPLE PHOTOGRAPHERS
SHARE
TWEET


From the February 2017 issue
We tried to stay above the fray this election cycle. I have rejected, for example, several politically charged story proposals this year, ranging from gold-plating an ’80s limo to road-testing a Subaru in northern Libya. But there is one intersection where cars and politics must collide, and it is at the corner of Energy and Policy.

Already, the Detroit Three have been lobbying the incoming administration to take their industry off the path to the 2025 CAFE regulations. These regs, you’ll remember, mandate a 54.5-mpg average for an auto­maker’s fleet, but the workarounds are already legion. Knowing the new guy’s pro-business proclivities—he’s good at business!—it seems certain that the previous administration’s CAFE plan won’t survive.

What does that mean for cars and light trucks going forward? One facile prediction: After years of engine downsizing, upsizing is going to be a thing.

The V-8 may reemerge as the engine of choice for sports sedans, sports cars, and trucks, and the EVs’ march could stall. The market penetration for pure EVs is barely half a percent now, and that’s with Tesla factored in and California’s thumb on the scale. For EVs to break through, they will need to be legitimately desirable, à la the Model S or Jaguar’s forthcoming I-Pace crossover. Their benefits will have to outweigh the convenience and familiarity of the internal-combustion engine.



But the conditions that got us to the point where EVs are actually lustworthy are a result of the research undertaken when we were said to be at peak oil and electrification was the most plausible way forward. If car and ­battery makers ease off EV R&D now, batteries may never fully pencil against IC engines, and desirable electrics at all price points may never materialize. California and the nine other ZEV states will mandate alt-fuelers, and the rest of the country will drive what it wants.

Barring government intervention or spiking fuel prices, we have shown that we will gravitate to the biggest, safest vehicles available. The American road of the future could look very much like that of the past. The joy that would bring to many of us enthusiasts is tempered by the cessation of big, exciting technological leaps. Back to the future, indeed

http://www.caranddriver.com/columns/carmakers-would-like-relief-from-cafe-mandates-bigly-column

OG muscle car era coming back strong :hat

Congrats, now let us hope Papi Trump keeps them broke boy cheap so you can cop in 5-6 years

5-6 years? what u think I work at McDonald's >D :lol

my Cuban I'm coppin this spring/summer is gonna be used SRT money now...brush up on your car talk, u spitting them bozo auto stats :lol
 
Lol at ninja praying that the top of the judicial branch is just as corrupt as the other two branches. Well, if he is right then we are all ******
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom