***Official Political Discussion Thread***

this *****...


White House counselor Kellyanne Conway charged CNN’s Anderson Cooper with sexism rolling his eyes during a recent interviewing that quickly went viral.

I face sexism a lot of times when I show up for interviews like that,” Conway said Thursday morning on “Fox & Friends.

“Can you imagine rolling your eyes… having a male anchor on a network roll eyes at Hillary Clinton, a female representative spokeswoman for President Obama or President Bill Clinton? I think not,” she added.
https://www.yahoo.com/tv/kellyanne-conway-accuses-anderson-cooper-sexism-viral-eye-143649588.html
 
63513382.jpg
  
 
Ninja, honest question. Doubt you'll answer but:
When you read Trump's transcripts, especially the worst ones, do you have any concerns whatsoever about his intellectual capacity and/or mental health?
I find it hard to believe that even a cult follower can read those and rationally conclude that's adequate for a president.
 
Last edited:
this *****...


White House counselor Kellyanne Conway charged CNN’s Anderson Cooper with sexism rolling his eyes during a recent interviewing that quickly went viral.

I face sexism a lot of times when I show up for interviews like that,” Conway said Thursday morning on “Fox & Friends.

“Can you imagine rolling your eyes… having a male anchor on a network roll eyes at Hillary Clinton, a female representative spokeswoman for President Obama or President Bill Clinton? I think not,” she added.
https://www.yahoo.com/tv/kellyanne-conway-accuses-anderson-cooper-sexism-viral-eye-143649588.html


But nobody looked at her eyes during that interview? She was clearly high :lol
 
Ninja, honest question. Doubt you'll answer but:
When you read Trump's transcripts, especially the worst ones, do you have any concerns whatsoever about his intellectual capacity and/or mental health?

Answering these kinds of questions requires introspection, something NH has never proved he has. He sees himself in Trump, that's why he can't find flaws in that dude. Trump is what NH would be if he had that kind of money.
 
this *****...


White House counselor Kellyanne Conway charged CNN’s Anderson Cooper with sexism rolling his eyes during a recent interviewing that quickly went viral.

I face sexism a lot of times when I show up for interviews like that,” Conway said Thursday morning on “Fox & Friends.

“Can you imagine rolling your eyes… having a male anchor on a network roll eyes at Hillary Clinton, a female representative spokeswoman for President Obama or President Bill Clinton? I think not,” she added.
https://www.yahoo.com/tv/kellyanne-conway-accuses-anderson-cooper-sexism-viral-eye-143649588.html


But nobody looked at her eyes during that interview? She was clearly high :lol

Sexism? Is she coopting SJW terms now? I thought they were put in da dustbin of history.
 
I think it's good to have the president's total idiocy and incompetence transcribed just in case someone would happen to miss it in the video

its on YouTube da second it happens... :lol

Your reading comprehension is never going to get better if you don't read.

transcripts devoid of contexts doesn't show da complete story.

You don't know what a transcript is, do you?

Please say this comment is trolling, for your sake.
 
Peter Daou @peterdaou

From @GlennThrush on #MorningJoe: Mike Pence was "in the room" on the Flynn conversations. The panel is laying waste to Pence's "innocence."
7:10 AM · May 11, 2017
 
I think it's good to have the president's total idiocy and incompetence transcribed just in case someone would happen to miss it in the video

its on YouTube da second it happens... :lol

Your reading comprehension is never going to get better if you don't read.

transcripts devoid of contexts doesn't show da complete story.

You don't know what a transcript is, do you?

Please say this comment is trolling, for your sake.

interpersonal communication is more than reading a transcript.
 
I think it's good to have the president's total idiocy and incompetence transcribed just in case someone would happen to miss it in the video

its on YouTube da second it happens... :lol

Your reading comprehension is never going to get better if you don't read.

transcripts devoid of contexts doesn't show da complete story
.

You don't know what a transcript is, do you?

Please say this comment is trolling, for your sake.

:lol

Reminds me of that college student who said that videos tell a better story than statistics.
 
For the record, the twitter link I posted on top of the transcripts is a video of the most relevant portion of the Lester Holt interview.

Also, the transcript was a faithful reconstruction of what is in the videos.
 
For the record, the twitter link I posted on top of the transcripts is a video of the most relevant portion of the Lester Holt interview.

and who's da arbiter for that?...da interview was ~ 7 mins... could've just posted da whole thing in complete context.
 
For the record, the twitter link I posted on top of the transcripts is a video of the most relevant portion of the Lester Holt interview.

and who's da arbiter for that?...da interview was ~ 7 mins... could've just posted da whole thing in complete context.

Yes, the video you posted is 7 minutes long, but the actual interview starts at 0:50 and ends at 3:18 and the rest is Lester Holt and friends discussing the interview. As far as I can tell, the entire two minutes and 28 seconds of interview is covered in the transcript I posted.

Unless you're referring to a different video.

Anyway, I appreciate you posted the longer clip. I wasn't trying to hide or not hide anything. I just posted the material I had on hand.

Personally I don't think the transcript obscures or leaves out anything meaningful that is contained in the video, but people can disagree on that.
 
Last edited:
For the record, the twitter link I posted on top of the transcripts is a video of the most relevant portion of the Lester Holt interview.

and who's da arbiter for that?...da interview was ~ 7 mins... could've just posted da whole thing in complete context.

What specifically do you think has been misrepresented by the condensed video or the transcript?

context, content, and tone gets manipulated when things aren't displayed in full.

its 7 mins, we ain't worried bout commerical breaks on NT, da whole video could've been posted easier than scraping portions off twitter.
 
FYI for whomever is interested -- the complete interview has not been shown yet. I believe longer excerpts will be televised tonight at 6:30 pm EST.
 
Last edited:
For the record, the twitter link I posted on top of the transcripts is a video of the most relevant portion of the Lester Holt interview.

and who's da arbiter for that?...da interview was ~ 7 mins... could've just posted da whole thing in complete context.

Yes, the video you posted is 7 minutes long, but the actual interview starts at 0:50 and ends at 3:18 and the rest is Lester Holt and friends discussing the interview. As far as I can tell, the entire two minutes and 28 seconds of interview is covered in the transcript I posted.

Unless you're referring to a different video.

Anyway, I appreciate you posted the longer clip. I wasn't trying to hide or not hide anything. I just posted the material I had on hand.

Personally I don't think the transcript obscures or leaves out anything meaningful that is contained in the video, but people can disagree on that.

Nah bruh, people can't disagree on that.

A transcript is nothing more than putting on paper what has been said. NH is simply trying to act as if there is more than the words that have been said (and written) to consider. NH is once again trying to obfuscate the debate.
 
Back
Top Bottom