- 17,697
- 2,714
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2006
The Republican Party was considered "The party of Lincoln, and in the 60's there was a shift w/ the Civil Rights Bill on the table. People just don't care to learn about that though
***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
The Republican Party was considered "The party of Lincoln, and in the 60's there was a shift w/ the Civil Rights Bill on the table. People just don't care to learn about that though
- 14,333
- 34,576
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2011
- 18,369
- 33,967
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2004
sometimes I wonder if he is subconsciously trying to convince himself that he is right in his views as much as he is trying to convince others on here.
it's similar to debating people who believe in conspiracy theories. every fact is distorted to fit their view because acknowledging the truth would conflict with their image of themselves/self-worth.
it's similar to debating people who believe in conspiracy theories. every fact is distorted to fit their view because acknowledging the truth would conflict with their image of themselves/self-worth.
Last edited:
Belgium
formerly colombia
- 26,242
- 37,583
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
No it can not?
I said a majority of racists identify themselves as pro-right so no you can't say the same of the pro-left community. That makes no sense.
Last edited:
- 29,630
- 1,862
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2003
Trump is very likely to lose to clinton but you just never know. Everyone was laughing. Not so funny now is it.
She has her own baggage and as i have said a few times, if there is a terrorist attack close to the election he will win.
Having him be the nominee and lose is probably the best outcome for people who want to see the GOP fracture and rebuild. Or rebrand if a rebuild is not possible
I will say i assume it pisses of the GOP base to see mitt rommey go harder at trump than he ever did at obama. This whole thing will have ever lasting effects especially if they refuse him the right to be the nominee.
Oh Hillary. The epitome of "i guess we will take her"
She has her own baggage and as i have said a few times, if there is a terrorist attack close to the election he will win.
Having him be the nominee and lose is probably the best outcome for people who want to see the GOP fracture and rebuild. Or rebrand if a rebuild is not possible
I will say i assume it pisses of the GOP base to see mitt rommey go harder at trump than he ever did at obama. This whole thing will have ever lasting effects especially if they refuse him the right to be the nominee.
Oh Hillary. The epitome of "i guess we will take her"
Belgium
formerly colombia
- 26,242
- 37,583
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
Trump being president is exactly what the terrorists want. His rhetoric and policies would just breed even more anti-US hatred. "We need to take out their families as well"
Bringing back torture techniques, not seeming to give a damn about collateral damage, ...
He'd be breeding more future terrorists than he eliminates.
Bringing back torture techniques, not seeming to give a damn about collateral damage, ...
He'd be breeding more future terrorists than he eliminates.
Last edited:
- 29,630
- 1,862
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2003
Doesn't really matter when people are scared.
- 2,683
- 5,598
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2017
cl-1b
Banned
- 1,165
- 126
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2015
You do realize that link agrees with mine, and also disproves your claim that King was a Republican.
No, the author is just siding with the leftists.. His family member said it on numerous occasions. You just won't admit it
You mean 1948
So no racist sides with the left?
- 24,926
- 23,230
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2010
ben roethlisberger
Banned
- 2,676
- 1,334
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
So, you're saying it's going to continue business as usual then?
Sounds to me like the perfect president lol. He fits the suit perfectly.
- 137,492
- 159,494
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2010
I mean she's attached herself at the hip with Obama's legacy so far this campaign season so you're damn right it's gonna be business as usual under Clinton 2.0
Last edited:
- 260
- 97
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
No, I meant the realignment after the 1964 election
RustyShackleford
Supporter
- 63,774
- 191,257
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
You do realize that link agrees with mine, and also disproves your claim that King was a Republican.
No, the author is just siding with the leftists.. His family member said it on numerous occasions. You just won't admit it
Famb you posted a fact checking site that showed you where wrong, you it that, to yourself.
No you wanna talk about authors.
sonoftony
Supporter
- 28,888
- 22,969
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2005
Which site it good to keep up with the Super Tuesday polls?
RustyShackleford
Supporter
- 63,774
- 191,257
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
I mean she's attached herself at the hip with Obama's legacy so far this campaign season so you're damn right it's gonna be business as usual under Clinton 2.0
What could Bernie get done that Clinton wouldn't.
Please give specifics
He's talking about the majority of racists
The majority cannot possibly side with 2 different groups
Politics aside, it's pathetic that you don't understand such an elementary concept
cl-1b
Banned
- 1,165
- 126
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2015
Famb you posted a fact checking site that showed you where wrong, you it that, to yourself.
No you wanna talk about authors.
His family said it in the article verbatim.
A negative FBI background check
Belgium
formerly colombia
- 26,242
- 37,583
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
Can you actually read?
I will quote myself again for the third time. I have bolded the important parts.
Could you please point out where I said that no racist sides with the left?
I said the majority of racists side with the right. Ofcourse there's pro-left racists, just a much smaller amount than the right.
Last edited:
cl-1b
Banned
- 1,165
- 126
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2015
No, it's pathetic that you guys say racism only exists on the right [emoji]128553[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji]
- 137,492
- 159,494
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2010
I mean she's attached herself at the hip with Obama's legacy so far this campaign season so you're damn right it's gonna be business as usual under Clinton 2.0
What could Bernie get done that Clinton wouldn't.
Please give specifics
What CAN he get done or what would he try to get done that Hillary can't/won't? What he can get done depends mostly on how congress shapes up in November but I have a good feeling that he'd actually give an honest effort towards achieving what he's advocated for on his platform like Wall Street regulation,cracking down on reckless big business behaviour,much less Hawkish foreign policy,universal healthcare and free post secondary public education etc since he's actually been advocating for all those for years and not just come election time.
I have a hard time believing that Hillary would go at some of her top donors in the same way...
Seriously doubt we'd see much of a change if any from Obama with Hillary,that's not who she is or who she wants to be.
Guess its cool if you're fine with the status quo.
Last edited:
cl-1b
Banned
- 1,165
- 126
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2015
Speculation, not fact
- 5,831
- 1,747
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2011
But "terrorists" are created here and will commit acts regardless of who is in charge because it's not based on who is in charge but about pushing agendas [emoji]128527[/emoji]
Y'all gotta know the script by now fam
cl-1b
Banned
- 1,165
- 126
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2015
District of Columbia
formerly dcmade
- 8,224
- 3,922
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2013
Is this dude the same person as Mr Highness ? One disappears and a new one pops up monthly it seems
