u gotta be rich to have a 401k? heh...
You dont have to be rich
But most folks live in the now becuase now is where the bills and life is happening
You cant hope to plan for the fututre when you a sinking in the present
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
u gotta be rich to have a 401k? heh...
What about my implication is offensive? That you are a public defender or that you aren't good at proving your points?
I cant tell if your being intentionally ignorant to play a part on the forum or just have blinders to what really happens past people politcal stable in real life
English please
You dont have to be rich
But most folks live in the now becuase now is where the bills and life is happening
You cant hope to plan for the fututre when you a sinking in the present
He said he can't tell if you're stupid or blind
Your insinuation that public defenders are not good at proving points. But we can pretend that wasn't your intent. As I said, I have friends that are public defenders that are beyond competent.
Maybe Dwalk is an attorney/lawyer. He argues minute points and items frequently. He just isn't very good at it. Public defender maybe?
Even people that work at McDonald's are seeing an increase in their paychecks due to the passing of the tax plan. 401k or not.
Ninja made a validpoint and your are crapping on it.
Also you can see a bump in pay at retail/ fast food type job but the reality is cost of living has not gone down.
In addition companies will look for warm bodies in these job before looking at experience. I know becuase if seen the practices of it
Enough to make a livable wage? Also, source?Even people that work at McDonald's are seeing an increase in their paychecks due to the passing of the tax plan. 401k or not.
Enough to make a livable wage? Also, source?
The point is that without the tax plan they would have had less. Period. Whether it is small, or not. It wouldn't have existed without the tax plan. That is a fact.
I am glad you posted that. So you believe that wages should be scaled based on how many children someone has and geographic location? So every year I want a raise I can have another child and the company has to pay the increase? Because based on that calculation your wages MUST increase per child.
EDIT: Also, if your spouse decides to stop working the company MUST pay the difference in my wages.
It is clear that no one suggesting this has ever owned a business or paid wages.
So based on me posting a living wage calculator you suddenly know what I'm thinking?
A bump in a retail line worker's pay ain't ***** really. Getting $13 instead of $12 is $40/week. Oil is about to jump so there that goes and then some.
That's not parity. That's just "give them something so they shut up."
I imagine they appreciate it more than you. What's not much to you might be a lot to others. Seems you are fortunate enough not to have those problems.