MVP
Supporter
- 83,006
- 85,579
So the government should let firms pick their tax rate, is that what you're saying?
What if they say zero?
It literally makes no sense man.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So the government should let firms pick their tax rate, is that what you're saying?
What if they say zero?
How low would he have to push them though?
Its called you ask them what would it take to keep manufacturing here. This is why we have a chamber of commerce.
So the government should let firms pick their tax rate, is that what you're saying?
What if they say zero?
Trump would LOWER taxes so they wouldn't wanna leave in da 1st place... Nice try
is there going to be some kind of structure to this plan? like is there going to be some kind of affirmative action/quota for jobs? is tump going to say "we'll give you this tax rate but you have to employ X amount of people for X amount of hours bi weekly"? or are the taxcuts going to be done in hopes of profit maximizing companies decide to bring jobs back to the US? serious questionsHow would they lose money if you're releasing da burden of high taxes which made them leave on da 1st place..you're literally talking in circles now
is there going to be some kind of structure to this plan? like is there going to be some kind of affirmative action/quota for jobs? is tump going to say "we'll give you this tax rate but you have to employ X amount of people for X amount of hours bi weekly"? or are the taxcuts going to be done in hopes of profit maximizing companies decide to bring jobs back to the US? serious questions
How would they lose money if you're releasing da burden of high taxes which made them leave on da 1st place..you're literally talking in circles now
You're assuming lowering the taxes and even closing the loopholes will still make it cheaper to make their goods here, thereby making them all come back.
as someone who works as an engineer in manufacturing, weve got maybe 5 people on the manufacturing floor that collect a salary and have been working at the company for years, the rest are essentially drones we get through a temp agency. most of what we do is mostly automated once set up though. one things for sure, companies arent going to take a step back from automation.Nobody knows,the only think we've been assured of, is that drumpf makes "good deals".
How would they lose money if you're releasing da burden of high taxes which made them leave on da 1st place..you're literally talking in circles now
Taxes are part of the picture, and much bigger part is cheap labor. The US can compete in capital cost, but will never be able to with labor cost. Unless you want to cut payroll taxes taxes for firms, and make people accept lower wages.
Just look at the factories that have comeback: http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/manufacturing-jobs-are-never-coming-back/ They factories don't look like the ones from decades ago, or factories overseas. They are capital intensive and much more automated.
Saying are trade deals have not been great is one thing, saying lower corporate taxes somewhat is a good idea is another, but these shouldn't be an excuse to institute bad policies. Let large corporations pick their tax rate is one of them.
I hope I hear you never mention the national debt or deficit again. Because all this stuff you're suggesting is just gonna explode both.
How would they lose money if you're releasing da burden of high taxes which made them leave on da 1st place..you're literally talking in circles now
Taxes are part of the picture, and much bigger part is cheap labor. The US can compete in capital cost, but will never be able to with labor cost. Unless you want to cut payroll taxes taxes for firms, and make people accept lower wages.
Just look at the factories that have comeback: http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/manufacturing-jobs-are-never-coming-back/ They factories don';t look like the ones from decades ago, or factories overseas. They are capital intensive and much more automated.
Saying are trade deals have not been great is one thing, but that shouldn't be an excuse to institute bad policies
You're assuming lowering the taxes and even closing the loopholes will still make it cheaper to make their goods here, thereby making them all come back.
Its called negotiate terms that would make it worth their while to stay & apply tarrifis to companies who make overseas and bring their products in.
You put American interests ahead of global interests.
Its called negotiate terms that would make it worth their while to stay & apply tarrifis to companies who make overseas and bring their products in.
You put American interests ahead of global interests.
How would they lose money if you're releasing da burden of high taxes which made them leave on da 1st place..you're literally talking in circles now
Taxes are part of the picture, and much bigger part is cheap labor. The US can compete in capital cost, but will never be able to with labor cost. Unless you want to cut payroll taxes taxes for firms, and make people accept lower wages.
Just look at the factories that have comeback: http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/manufacturing-jobs-are-never-coming-back/ They factories don't look like the ones from decades ago, or factories overseas. They are capital intensive and much more automated.
Saying are trade deals have not been great is one thing, saying lower corporate taxes somewhat is a good idea is another, but these shouldn't be an excuse to institute bad policies. Let large corporations pick their tax rate is one of them.
I hope I hear you never mention the national debt or deficit again. Because all this stuff you're suggesting is just gonna explode both.
Da debt is a entitlement problem, da lack of energy exploration, and decade plus war which will b paired back and Trump wants to take a mercenaries approach... Want protection? Pay us or shut up.
You're assuming lowering the taxes and even closing the loopholes will still make it cheaper to make their goods here, thereby making them all come back.
Its called negotiate terms that would make it worth their while to stay & apply tarrifis to companies who make overseas and bring their products in.
You put American interests ahead of global interests.
I'm not disagreeing with the point of putting America interest first, there is some truth in this comment.
But, you do realize that this will cause prices to increase right?
If we are going to have a honest discussion about free trade, let's keep it all the way #1HUNNA. Firms will just pass on the cost of the tariffs to its customers
You're assuming lowering the taxes and even closing the loopholes will still make it cheaper to make their goods here, thereby making them all come back.
Its called negotiate terms that would make it worth their while to stay & apply tarrifis to companies who make overseas and bring their products in.
You put American interests ahead of global interests.
I'm not disagreeing with the point of putting America interest first, there is some truth in this comment.
But, you do realize that this will cause prices to increase right?
If we are going to have a honest discussion about free trade, let's keep it all the way #1HUNNA. Firms will just pass on the cost of the tariffs to its customers
You're assuming lowering the taxes and even closing the loopholes will still make it cheaper to make their goods here, thereby making them all come back.
Its called negotiate terms that would make it worth their while to stay & apply tarrifis to companies who make overseas and bring their products in.
You put American interests ahead of global interests.
I'm not disagreeing with the point of putting America interest first, there is some truth in this comment.
But, you do realize that this will cause prices to increase right?
And we don't subsidize the "loser" of trade deals.
-And embargo is a horrible idea imo, it is a nuclear option. Not just electronics like Iphones are made overseas. Toothbrushes, clothes, shoes, machine parts, prescription drugs, etc.
And in the short term, and supply shock like that to consumer goods will probably cause a recession.
And the market dictate prices. If a company will charge what it can at the time, you can't have a constant gun to their head like that.
-Free trade has many benefits. Hell even domestically Americans benefit from having free trade between states.
The problem is that we don't have good trade deals, they are about increasing trade to lift all boast, but rather about helping corporations get higher profits first and foremost.
And we don't subsidize the "loser" of trade deals. A minority pay the price for the many (or corporation) to benefit.
I'm open to new tariffs, and lower taxes (with conditions), but not an embargo.
why do we have to adapt the market to people. why can't the people adapt to the market.
i just don't get how people who live-and-die by the concept of a free market also want to give everyone jobs. maybe in the best most productive market only 30% of people work full time.
this isn't aimed at you, dathbgboy, by the way. just my off-the-cuff rambling on what i think is a flawed premise, especially when it's put forth by republicans, especially given their ideologies on other issues.
looking at it realistically... food and manufacturing and energy are so damn cheap these days. we don't face the same limits that our ancestors did. we don't need a dozen people working a farm to feed a family. we can probably have 1 guy with a few good machines feeding a small village by himself. service industry too will be revolutionized since now i can ask google 99% of what i need. i don't need to call someone or visit a library or ask a useless department store clerk what shoe is in style.
what jobs do we actually need? the ones that don't require skill or don't have good profit margins or can be mass-produced in a way that means the labor can't be paid well, to hell with those jobs. let the chinese produce them.
Hilary building that email server was dumb and unnecessary.
But the hyperventilating, investigations, and hearings it's lead to seem to me to be pretty obviously partisan.
The emails scandal is a political problem not a legal one. imo