***Official Political Discussion Thread***

"Have the police ever dropped an atomic bomb on a city? No? Then clearly there are no similarities and this comparison is totally invalid"

please do better.

I said that a policy that applies to policy obviously wouldn't apply to the military because they are not the same.

and as an example I claimed that police do not regularly employ drone strikes or carpet bombing as a policing tactic and their primary function is not killing people.

someone then found a time that the police used a bomb, to claim that I don't know I guess police regularly bomb people like the military.

This claim is obviously absurd. :lol:
 
Dudes are providing facts and solid arguments against what you saying n you either dismissing em or moving goal posts...Thats the 1st steps to full on defense of the boys

"Solid facts, and solid arguments." :lol

if you believe that I can't help you.
just don't make up things about me thanks.
 
I always forget dude a Canadian contrarian. but the data states 🤓 the data states cops been killing folks with near impunity.

just tell them to stop killing people lol

yah sure this is what I said. :rolleyes

if you need to make up strawmen to argue against, i probabaly says something about your own position.
 
We're sitting here telling you that the police are administered like the military procedurally and in many instances are heavily militarized. We're the ones that witness and experience it firsthand. Especially over the past six months. Disagreeing with that in your position ain't in your repertoire.

I wouldn't expect an American to try and tell you how the Canadian health care system moves.
This what it is at this point in here weekly :lol: :smh:

EVERYBODY: It’s already alotta police where I’m at but they all terrible and don’t prevent or solve any crime...They shouldn’t get more money for bad performance n being ineffective

OSH: You wrong! The polls and articles I searched for telling me that’s stupid...I don’t care what’s going on outside around you, y’all should listen to me cuz I know from the internet
 
please do better.

I said that a policy that applies to policy obviously wouldn't apply to the military because they are not the same.

and as an example I claimed that police do not regularly employ drone strikes or carpet bombing as a policing tactic and their primary function is not killing people.

someone then found a time that the police used a bomb, to claim that I don't know I guess police regularly bomb people like the military.

This claim is obviously absurd. :lol:
You're full of **** and it's embarassing. Here's the actual words and sequence for anyone that comes across this lie:


okay let me know the next time a police department carries out a drone strike or carpet bombs a city

and then ill agree that it's "not by much"

 
Osh: You wrong! The polls and articles I searched for telling me that’s stupid...I don’t care what’s going on outside around you, y’all should listen to me cuz I know from the internet

my bad sorry I look for data to support my claims.

im very sorry for this.

I sincerely apologize.
 
You're full of **** and it's embarassing. Here's the actual words and sequence for anyone that comes across this lie:

and i await for you to produce a time the police carpet bombed a city or drone strike people and I will agree with your claim, "the miltary and police are the same."

i don't think they are the same and military and police policy should be different.
 
please do better.

I said that a policy that applies to policy obviously wouldn't apply to the military because they are not the same.

and as an example I claimed that police do not regularly employ drone strikes or carpet bombing as a policing tactic and their primary function is not killing people.

someone then found a time that the police used a bomb, to claim that I don't know I guess police regularly bomb people like the military.

This claim is obviously absurd. :lol:

No I said the police and military aren't that different and you said they're not EXACTLY the same because of carpet bombings and drone strikes.

But no one said they're exactly the same. They're similar in how they're administered here and abroad, tactically, strategically, employ a lot of the same people, technology and so one. For some reason that wasn't enough for you to grasp the comparison and how the two lines could get blurred.
 
please do better.

I said that a policy that applies to policy obviously wouldn't apply to the military because they are not the same.

and as an example I claimed that police do not regularly employ drone strikes or carpet bombing as a policing tactic and their primary function is not killing people.

someone then found a time that the police used a bomb, to claim that I don't know I guess police regularly bomb people like the military.

This claim is obviously absurd. :lol:

This is a total mischaracterization of that exchange, but alright

What do you think it says about your arguments that you are constantly needing to go back and tidy them up to say "this is what I actually meant"?
 
No I said the police and military aren't that different and you said they're not EXACTLY the same because of carpet bombings and drone strikes.

But no one said they're exactly the same. They're similar in how they're administered here and abroad, tactically, strategically, employ a lot of the same people, technology and so one. For some reason that wasn't enough for you to grasp the comparison and how the two lines could get blurred.

the military and police are different and naturally require different policy prescriptions.

if you can't see how military killing non citizens in foreign countries is different materially than civilian police force I cannot help you.
 
your claim, "the miltary and police are the same."
raw
 
This is a total mischaracterization of that exchange, but alright

What do you think it says about your arguments that you are constantly needing to go back and tidy them up to say "this is what I actually meant"?

it's quite simple.

Defund the police doesn't actually make any sense,

so it's necessary to distort the position of an opposing interlocutor because arguing for defunding the police on the merits is untenable.
 

the original point, was OSH IF YOU WANT TO FUND THE POLICE YOU SHOULD WANT TO FUND THE MILITARY.

MY RESPONSE: The military and police are different so they require different policies.


that where this originally stemmed from,

the idea that if you have X policy for the police it should apply equally to the military.


that only makes sense if you belive the police and military are not materially different.

I think they are different and require different policies, what do you think?
 
it's quite simple.

Defund the police doesn't actually make any sense,

so it's necessary to distort the position of an opposing interlocutor because arguing for defunding the police on the merits is untenable.

It's dumb except when it works.
 
Obama's class is not deserved by dirtbags, bottomfeeders, lowlifes.




He also proves why activists are needed, and that is because he is too predictable. He'll always say and then do, the thing that will make everyone comfortable with themselves, and that includes those dirtbags, bottomfeeders, lowlifes.

Defund the police. When they kill an innocent, take their pensions, penalize the entire department that they are a part of.
 
Back
Top Bottom