- 4,971
- 5,516
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2010
i wonder if the "LeBron" on the side of the box glows in the dark..it looks like it would
Official: Revised Lebron IX Thread. MVP's revealed! MV's WILL have toddler sizes! 6/2
- 4,240
- 1,216
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2009
Box is cool. I still don't like that new logo though.
- 4,240
- 1,216
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2009
Would be
if on the dunkman IX's they replace that logo on the box with a dunkman.
- 8,878
- 453
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2006
Originally Posted by gentry187
Would beif on the dunkman IX's they replace that logo on the box with a dunkman.
i concur
- 11
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2011
Idk why people dislike the IX so much. It looks like a pretty decent shoe. I'd deff cop, but not at retail unless its some a cw that's fire. (And no that doesn't mean some limited, overhyped cw)
bronle
Banned
- 1,943
- 11
- Joined
- May 5, 2011
Yes it does.
- 43,564
- 27,870
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2002
You could be right. Glow in the dark on the box is fine with me as long as it's not gonna be on the IX.
- 7,521
- 4,705
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
Thats a nice box
nikedealer
Banned
- 1,615
- 171
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2011
Simple IS sexy
Agreed
Agreed
- 9,378
- 4,223
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2005
Box is dope..but I'm still hesitant bout the shoes..I still have to see them in person before I make my decision..
- 20,202
- 4,184
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- 4,812
- 640
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2011
Can't wait to wear the box
- 23,378
- 6,001
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2007
It's a damn shame when a box gets more play than the shoe. Nike, you're doing it wrong. IMO I prefer the black box with the Lion than a plain white box with that old *!@ LBJ logo :kanye shrug:
- 1,423
- 850
- Joined
- May 31, 2005
Should make the midsole white or something http://sneakernews.com/2011/08/14/nike-lebron-9-packaging/
- 2,549
- 206
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2010
I like the box, usually i'd cop Lebrons for casual but I think these will def be for ballin
- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
The shape of the shoe looks slightly different in those pics
bronle
Banned
- 1,943
- 11
- Joined
- May 5, 2011
Imma hate myself for saying this after i talked all that #@+% about how ugly these were, but they look decent without the elongated toe box
gotta be GS sizes, and even if they are a size 9 or something, I'm a 13 so I won't even get used to them looking like that lol
- 20,261
- 2,188
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2006
those new pics sold me on this shoe/colorway
- 23,378
- 6,001
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2007
I don't know what Nike did, but the shape does look different, even BETTER. Possibly a smaller shoe was thrown in to fool us
- 26,471
- 3,561
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2008
Originally Posted by gentry187
Would beif on the dunkman IX's they replace that logo on the box with a dunkman.
- 3,648
- 1,223
- Joined
- May 22, 2005
still waiting to see better colors of these, the first black/red color always takes longer to grow on me for some reason.
Box is cool, not bad but nothing great(the concord box is great in comparison).
I really want to like the 9s, I do...these(at least this color) doesn't look like $165 in my eyes though.
Box is cool, not bad but nothing great(the concord box is great in comparison).
I really want to like the 9s, I do...these(at least this color) doesn't look like $165 in my eyes though.
- 3,842
- 442
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2002
Originally Posted by you big dummy
these grew on me
those new pics sold me on this shoe/colorway
- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
I'm coming around, I wouldn't pay retail for them but if they drop to around $100 or less I'll pick up a pair.
- 1,769
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2010
This.
- 4,812
- 640
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2011
I guess you'll be getting a pair around this time next year thenOriginally Posted by EMM23
This.
