- 24,441
- 22,120
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2015
Lance is better imo. Plus our D is average at best, which makes Fields look good
Lance has higher potential, but Fields is much more polished. He’s also being coached better it seems.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Lance is better imo. Plus our D is average at best, which makes Fields look good
If the Jets keep stinking we might get get him back in a couple years. That job was a quick payday, Saleh can’t fix that team.It’s painfully obvious, Demeco is a major downgrade at DC
Getting the starting role has only helped speed up Fields' development and more importantly, confidence.Lance has higher potential, but Fields is much more polished. He’s also being coached better it seems.
Getting the starting role has only helped speed up Fields' development and more importantly, confidence.
Lance don't have none of that rn cause 49ers ownership too gotdamn stubborn about their $137 million bust of an investment
It also helps Dalton's base salary only 3 mil, compare this to Jimmy's salary and it's an easy decision to make for the Bears naming JF the permanent starter.Bears realized their mistake in starting Dalton early and moved forward. Too bad we can’t do the same.
It also helps Dalton's base salary only 3 mil, compare this to Jimmy's salary and it's an easy decision to make for the Bears naming JF the permanent starter.
We need Jimmy to make endless mistakes or get hurt again before Trey gets the opportunity. But for Trey to have the job permanently, Lynch needs to trade Jimmy imo