Originally Posted by LuketheJediKnight
"Simple. All those passes Bron makes to 4 bums wouldn't do any good vs 5 decent NBA'ers."
Damn. Like, I didn't even mention LeBron's name at ALL in that postWhat the hell are you talking about?
Your reading comprehension is atrocious. You can't keep up with an argument much less ARGUE one.
Originally Posted by LuketheJediKnight
"Simple. All those passes Bron makes to 4 bums wouldn't do any good vs 5 decent NBA'ers."
Damn. Like, I didn't even mention LeBron's name at ALL in that postWhat the hell are you talking about?
Your reading comprehension is atrocious. You can't keep up with an argument much less ARGUE one.
People called out Jordan FOR YEARS until he won a ring. FOR YEARS. Maybe you should look that up.
People called out Jordan FOR YEARS until he won a ring. FOR YEARS. Maybe you should look that up.
Originally Posted by CP1708
Originally Posted by LuketheJediKnight
"Simple. All those passes Bron makes to 4 bums wouldn't do any good vs 5 decent NBA'ers."
Damn. Like, I didn't even mention LeBron's name at ALL in that postWhat the hell are you talking about?
Your reading comprehension is atrocious. You can't keep up with an argument much less ARGUE one.God damn. We're in a Lebron thread, and you asked which player I would choose, I gave you my answer, then mentioned why I would take him over Bron.
Sorry for mentioning Bron's name in a Bron thread. My bad.
Originally Posted by CP1708
Originally Posted by LuketheJediKnight
"Simple. All those passes Bron makes to 4 bums wouldn't do any good vs 5 decent NBA'ers."
Damn. Like, I didn't even mention LeBron's name at ALL in that postWhat the hell are you talking about?
Your reading comprehension is atrocious. You can't keep up with an argument much less ARGUE one.God damn. We're in a Lebron thread, and you asked which player I would choose, I gave you my answer, then mentioned why I would take him over Bron.
Sorry for mentioning Bron's name in a Bron thread. My bad.
Originally Posted by LuketheJediKnight
Originally Posted by CP1708
Originally Posted by LuketheJediKnight
"Simple. All those passes Bron makes to 4 bums wouldn't do any good vs 5 decent NBA'ers."
Damn. Like, I didn't even mention LeBron's name at ALL in that postWhat the hell are you talking about?
Your reading comprehension is atrocious. You can't keep up with an argument much less ARGUE one.God damn. We're in a Lebron thread, and you asked which player I would choose, I gave you my answer, then mentioned why I would take him over Bron.
Sorry for mentioning Bron's name in a Bron thread. My bad.
I never asked you about Bron in that post though. At all. As to what you said earlier, you said you would pick Kobe over those players I referred to in my question about NBA players and "Polly" players, because he would give you the best chance to win. And guess what? You'd be right to do that...the only problem is that also contradicts everything to were taking about in this thread. If Kobe and his YMCA scrubs played for the city championship against those NBA players, and the NBA team wins, would you still pick Kobe among everyone who plays if you wanted an individual player for a team? Why? He would be on the LOSING TEAM right? It would make more sense to pick one of the average NBA players on the winning team over Kobe...
Originally Posted by LuketheJediKnight
Originally Posted by CP1708
Originally Posted by LuketheJediKnight
"Simple. All those passes Bron makes to 4 bums wouldn't do any good vs 5 decent NBA'ers."
Damn. Like, I didn't even mention LeBron's name at ALL in that postWhat the hell are you talking about?
Your reading comprehension is atrocious. You can't keep up with an argument much less ARGUE one.God damn. We're in a Lebron thread, and you asked which player I would choose, I gave you my answer, then mentioned why I would take him over Bron.
Sorry for mentioning Bron's name in a Bron thread. My bad.
I never asked you about Bron in that post though. At all. As to what you said earlier, you said you would pick Kobe over those players I referred to in my question about NBA players and "Polly" players, because he would give you the best chance to win. And guess what? You'd be right to do that...the only problem is that also contradicts everything to were taking about in this thread. If Kobe and his YMCA scrubs played for the city championship against those NBA players, and the NBA team wins, would you still pick Kobe among everyone who plays if you wanted an individual player for a team? Why? He would be on the LOSING TEAM right? It would make more sense to pick one of the average NBA players on the winning team over Kobe...
imma let my yung bol handle my light workOriginally Posted by LuketheJediKnight
And the point continues to fly over ya damn head.
You have a great player, and two teams with overall UNEQUAL talent and production. The average NBA players winning that game does NOT tell you how how any individual in that game played. The fact that I used average NBA players as an example is actually irrelevant - it was simply used to help clarify this important fact for your ignorant mind to understand.
THIS IS NO DIFFERENT FOR ELITE PLAYERS, BECAUSE THEY STILL HAVE TO PLAY ON A TEAM. By comparing rings as you've doing all along, you're implicity assuming that elites play with the same supporting casts around them, which is obviously false. They're not trotting the same teams out there. Just as you can't talk about Morrsion's rings without looking at who he played with, it's no different with Kobe or anyone else when comparing him with LBJ or anyone else. It fails to account for other players who also made a significant contribution (or lack thereof) to their team.
But once again, you bring up "ring count" as if Kobe and Bron and whomever else you want to name play with the same players. If that's the case, you wouldn't have a problem if Jerry West called up Dan Gilbert and swapped Kobe's teammates for the Cavs right now, would you? And you also wouldn't complain if that squad got whipped by the Celtics in a seven-game series, and then blame Kobe for not, as you would say, "getting it done" with a squad that has lost 20-something games in a row.
TOTAL TEAM PRODUCTION = RINGS.
imma let my yung bol handle my light workOriginally Posted by LuketheJediKnight
And the point continues to fly over ya damn head.
You have a great player, and two teams with overall UNEQUAL talent and production. The average NBA players winning that game does NOT tell you how how any individual in that game played. The fact that I used average NBA players as an example is actually irrelevant - it was simply used to help clarify this important fact for your ignorant mind to understand.
THIS IS NO DIFFERENT FOR ELITE PLAYERS, BECAUSE THEY STILL HAVE TO PLAY ON A TEAM. By comparing rings as you've doing all along, you're implicity assuming that elites play with the same supporting casts around them, which is obviously false. They're not trotting the same teams out there. Just as you can't talk about Morrsion's rings without looking at who he played with, it's no different with Kobe or anyone else when comparing him with LBJ or anyone else. It fails to account for other players who also made a significant contribution (or lack thereof) to their team.
But once again, you bring up "ring count" as if Kobe and Bron and whomever else you want to name play with the same players. If that's the case, you wouldn't have a problem if Jerry West called up Dan Gilbert and swapped Kobe's teammates for the Cavs right now, would you? And you also wouldn't complain if that squad got whipped by the Celtics in a seven-game series, and then blame Kobe for not, as you would say, "getting it done" with a squad that has lost 20-something games in a row.
TOTAL TEAM PRODUCTION = RINGS.
To me, it's Rose's award to win. But I feel like Bron's still gonna get it in the end, and then everyone complaining about Pooh getting snubbed like so many before him
To me, it's Rose's award to win. But I feel like Bron's still gonna get it in the end, and then everyone complaining about Pooh getting snubbed like so many before him
