perfect face?

Originally Posted by knightngale

Originally Posted by Big J 33


The 18-year-old student is blessed with what is described as the perfect face. It matches an international blueprint for the optimum ratio between eyes, mouth, forehead and chin, endowing her with flawless proportions.
A woman's face is said to be most attractive when the space between her pupils is just under half the width of her face from ear to ear. Florence scores a 44 per cent ratio. Experts also believe the relative distance between eyes and mouth should be just over a third of the measurement from hairline to chin. Florence's ratio is 32.8 per cent.
Singer Shania Twain and actresses Liz Hurley and Jessica Alba are ranked among perfectly formed celebrities. 
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
From the article.
Not saying I agree with their criteria, but that's where they're basing it on.
Click to expand...
I wonder who can up with this blueprint
eyes.gif


these types of stories will probably lead to an increase in plastic surgery like in Korea


And there is the fundamental problem with this entire thread & logic. 
Who defines beauty?

Why would I let someone random person/group of people determine the "international standard" of facial perfection? 

This logic and thread is laughable. 
 
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican

Originally Posted by FlipnKraut

Originally Posted by Scientific Method

Dude, with the word "perfect" in it, how can it be anything but subjective and biased to the tastes of the person who created it.



I can make a "perfect body measurements" formula. I like a 1.67:1:1.67 bust to waist to hips ratio, my golden formula right there. Hovkid and many other nters would call that girl fat, say her lower half is disproportionate, some would say her breasts are too big. I think it is perfect though, since I created it from the perspective of my own tastes; subjective.



That bootleg Sarah Osbourne looking chic and certainly that plastoc anime looking chic are not very attractive to me, hence not perfect. I give less than a %+%% about the ratios and spacing of facial features
Click to expand...


Again, you still haven't looked up the golden ratio. It's not some arbitrary number Leonardo Da Vinci thought up.
Click to expand...
Oooooooooo I see. Because he made it up it must be right. Cool. If you can't understand the holes in your argument I will leave you alone.
Click to expand...

Damn, you don't read do you.
 
It isn't adding up for you for whatever reason.

Let me break it down again.

Beauty is opinionated. There is not if ands or buts about it.

If a man creates a system that creates a mathematical equation to determine beauty (something that is opinionated) how does that somehow transform beauty into a factual item? It is still opinionated. Equation or not, the equation was created with bias already present in the mind of the creator. So again, why should anyone take this equation seriously?

And to bring up the Golden Ratio as if it somehow relates to this discussion is laughable.

But you got it man.
 
Originally Posted by eiddyfouw

Originally Posted by knightngale

Originally Posted by Big J 33

From the article.
Not saying I agree with their criteria, but that's where they're basing it on.
Click to expand...
I wonder who can up with this blueprint
eyes.gif


these types of stories will probably lead to an increase in plastic surgery like in Korea
Click to expand...
And there is the fundamental problem with this entire thread & logic. 
Who defines beauty?

Why would I let someone random person/group of people determine the "international standard" of facial perfection? 

This logic and thread is laughable. 
Click to expand...


White people man. Its their "right"
 
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican

It isn't adding up for you for whatever reason.

Let me break it down again.

Beauty is opinionated. There is not if ands or buts about it.

If a man creates a system that creates a mathematical equation to determine beauty (something that is opinionated) how does that somehow transform beauty into a factual item? It is still opinionated. Equation or not, the equation was created with bias already present in the mind of the creator. So again, why should anyone take this equation seriously?

And to bring up the Golden Ratio as if it somehow relates to this discussion is laughable.

But you got it man.
Click to expand...

Honestly, your ignorance is laughable.
Just admit you came into this thread, saw a white girl, then immediately got mad and didn't bother to read anything before posting your opinion.
 
Originally Posted by FlipnKraut

Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican

It isn't adding up for you for whatever reason.

Let me break it down again.

Beauty is opinionated. There is not if ands or buts about it.

If a man creates a system that creates a mathematical equation to determine beauty (something that is opinionated) how does that somehow transform beauty into a factual item? It is still opinionated. Equation or not, the equation was created with bias already present in the mind of the creator. So again, why should anyone take this equation seriously?

And to bring up the Golden Ratio as if it somehow relates to this discussion is laughable.

But you got it man.
Click to expand...

Honestly, your ignorance is laughable.
Just admit you came into this thread, saw a white girl, then immediately got mad and didn't bother to read anything before posting your opinion.
Click to expand...

I actually agree with everything DC is saying there. 
He's right, it's all based on opinion.  

How can there be a golden standard of opinion?
 
Lets face it NO one is perfect or has a perfect face. A girl could have the "golden ratio" and some guy would think another girl without it is perfect and golden face girl isn't perfect. Like DC said a couple posts back, it is all subjected. And that my friends, is objective
 
Originally Posted by Kramer

Lets face it NO one is perfect or has a perfect face. A girl could have the "golden ratio" and some guy would think another girl without it is perfect and golden face girl isn't perfect. Like DC said a couple posts back, it is all subjected. And that my friends, is objective
Click to expand...
Exactly. You can't scientifically quantify beauty because everyone has different perceptions of what they think is beautiful. 
 
Originally Posted by FlipnKraut

Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican

It isn't adding up for you for whatever reason.

Let me break it down again.

Beauty is opinionated. There is not if ands or buts about it.

If a man creates a system that creates a mathematical equation to determine beauty (something that is opinionated) how does that somehow transform beauty into a factual item? It is still opinionated. Equation or not, the equation was created with bias already present in the mind of the creator. So again, why should anyone take this equation seriously?

And to bring up the Golden Ratio as if it somehow relates to this discussion is laughable.

But you got it man.
Click to expand...

Honestly, your ignorance is laughable.
Just admit you came into this thread, saw a white girl, then immediately got mad and didn't bother to read anything before posting your opinion.
Click to expand...

Yea call me ignorant. That will get your point across. 
pimp.gif

Again, you just don't get what I (and others) are saying and you somehow can't understand what biased means.

I don't have any issue with white girls. If it were a black or asian woman there the test would still be biased. You are ignoring what the word biased means for whatever reason and are focusing on my perceived hate for white women (which doesn't exist).

It is along the same levels of an IQ test. I guess you feel an IQ test is also NOT a biased test right? Let me guess, since it is a internationally recognized test it must not be biased right?

It is cool though I just chalk it up to you not knowing what the word biased means because if you did we wouldn't have had so much back and forth. Simple as that. 
 
Originally Posted by solidsnake

This is perfection to me...

jessica_alba-24224.jpg

Jessica-Alba-Hot-Pictures-.jpg

jessica-alba-004.jpg


Spoiler [+]
11470316.jpg
Click to expand...
From the original article. Your example agrees with the criteria used.

"Singer Shania Twain and actresses Liz Hurley and Jessica Alba are ranked among perfectly formed celebrities."
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...rl-Britains-beautiful-face.html#ixzz1t9rgNFve

BTW It was a contest in the UNITED KINGDOM with 8,000 people. Of course there are other women out there that could be considered more beautiful
 
Originally Posted by youngdoc

BTW It was a contest in the UNITED KINGDOM with 8,000 people. Of course there are other women out there that could be considered more beautiful
Click to expand...
Don't even waste your time.
 
Originally Posted by SIZE TENS

Originally Posted by youngdoc

BTW It was a contest in the UNITED KINGDOM with 8,000 people. Of course there are other women out there that could be considered more beautiful
Click to expand...
Don't even waste your time.
Click to expand...
laugh.gif


People saw a white face, got mad and didn't even read the article.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest News

View All News

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

Site contents may not be incorporated into AI training data or any other derivative works without prior express written consent.

Links to participating merchants may generate referral or affiliate commissions that help support our community. See our policies for details. NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom