Senoj
formerly adidas freak
- 1,696
- 352
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2006
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
The fact that I support this bill as a whole does not mean I agree with everything in it.
Replaced by who though? Santorum? No. Bachman? No. Romney? No. Ron Paul? The love for Ron Paul really confuses me, I do agree with his drug and foreign policy, but thats about it.Originally Posted by a55a5in11
i seriously hope he is gone by 2012
Originally Posted by yngSIMBA
Replaced by who though? Santorum? No. Bachman? No. Romney? No. Ron Paul? The love for Ron Paul really confuses me, I do agree with his drug and foreign policy, but thats about it.Originally Posted by a55a5in11
i seriously hope he is gone by 2012
But before I start blindly praising Obama, as I'm somewhat new to following politics, what is this bill for exactly?
Originally Posted by Essential1
When you are going against 87-13 in vote for Defense Authorization Bill, any veto will be overturned by 2/3 majority fairly easily, and you get completely beat..
His best choice is to go through the Justice Department an execute the law as far away from the passed bill proposed as possible, and wait for someone to bring a Supreme Court Case to strike down the law... That really is his only choice...
Should he have veto'd it? If he could switch 22 votes from Yes to No in the Senate then yes.. But anyone will tell you, you will not be able to flip that many people in a landslide vote...
House he would have to switch about a handful of votes.. Possibly he could have switched the vote.. But Democrats went right down the middle.. "Blue Dog Dems" were the Yes votes, and trying to move them is just as hard as moving the tea party
Remember any veto can be overridden and the law as it stands without any changes becomes law...
I'm not saying you are wrong at all... Just wanted to give the perspective...Originally Posted by LUKEwarm Skywalker
Originally Posted by Essential1
When you are going against 87-13 in vote for Defense Authorization Bill, any veto will be overturned by 2/3 majority fairly easily, and you get completely beat..
His best choice is to go through the Justice Department an execute the law as far away from the passed bill proposed as possible, and wait for someone to bring a Supreme Court Case to strike down the law... That really is his only choice...
Should he have veto'd it? If he could switch 22 votes from Yes to No in the Senate then yes.. But anyone will tell you, you will not be able to flip that many people in a landslide vote...
House he would have to switch about a handful of votes.. Possibly he could have switched the vote.. But Democrats went right down the middle.. "Blue Dog Dems" were the Yes votes, and trying to move them is just as hard as moving the tea party
Remember any veto can be overridden and the law as it stands without any changes becomes law...
^^Irrespective of the futility of his veto, it still mattered. It sends the right kind of message to the American people.
It's the difference between an athlete who competes 'till the very end, though the game has long been lost, versus an athlete who quits competing when the final outcome is apparent (Obama and this bill).
That ishh is wack and pathetic. What good is an elected official if (s)he doesn't stand up for his/her constituents?
"I'm gonna sign all these bills into law, even though I don't agree with them"...like really?.......
...
Originally Posted by CryingFreemancoa
can someone explain what exactly is wrong in this bill.
Originally Posted by hymen man
AWESOME AVY cryingfreeman