- 5,758
- 4,682
- Joined
- May 2, 2012
R.I.P Trayvon
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by shoefreakbaby,
- Start date
- 5,712
- 1,019
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
So since GZ only followed TM once he was in the housing area, it didn't constitute multiple or repeated occurrences.
Therefore old creepy dudes can just wait in a parking lot, spot a girl and follow her home since that's only one occurrence.
Loopholes in the law can actually benefit criminals then!
- 1,391
- 172
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2002
- 11,810
- 645
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2010
There is ZERO time limit or day limit when it involves stalking
Y'all need to stop pulling **** out of your *****
Y'all need to stop pulling **** out of your *****
- 1,391
- 172
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2002
what point are you exactly trying to make? That stalking is according to you or what the law states?
celticsfan9783
Banned
- 5,318
- 665
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2010
- 11,810
- 645
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2010
Because we should all take Florida's law as gold, right? **** outta here.
He stalked Trayvon.
celticsfan9783
Banned
- 5,318
- 665
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2010
Well since it was tried in Florida's court of Law...yes
- 11,810
- 645
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2010
I guess Casey Anthony is innocent too
- 1,391
- 172
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2002
Personal feelings have nothing to do with a verdict bruh.
According to Florida law, YES Casey Anthony is innocent.
- 9,996
- 200
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2004
the south strikes again
- 18,488
- 6,333
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2009
[emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji] there is no use bro. The law is always right.
- 1,391
- 172
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2002
Amazing how stupid some of you are.
Really? Says the guy who is oblivious to the law.
SMH.
Reading is fundamental.
- 43,207
- 28,386
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2003
Y'all aren't even arguing the same thing.
celticsfan9783
Banned
- 5,318
- 665
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2010
Just because she's found not guilty, doesn't mean she didn't do it. Is that really a difficult concept?
- 11,810
- 645
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2010
that's my point, b.
- 5,892
- 6,287
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2012
I implore everybody to read through the first 10-20 pages of this thread to see the character that likes to play "Devils Advocate" and thinks he is some kinda of Angela Lansbury on this whole "trial", and his bigot partner returns right on time...But everything this dude says is straight ignorance in refinement. This dude has waffled so many times in this thread with his so called "expertise", but turns around and can't even get the reference or correlation with James Byrd Jr., It truly is funny how he keeps running his mouth but there is something that you don't know CelticsFan....Really don't see the need to expose this fraud anymore or come into this thread because the evidence trail this dude has left is more then enough. He truly is the juror B37 of Niketalk...
I ain't got no worries....
Told you that you could easily be exposed
And I still know something UENO about
I ain't got no worries....
Told you that you could easily be exposed
And I still know something UENO about
Last edited:
- 1,942
- 1,326
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
Not guilty and innocent are two totally different things.
Anthony was not innocent.
- 12,422
- 2,916
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2008
After that juror interview, how could anyone think this was truly a fair trial? Her opening sentence was bias. IMO it didn't matter what the prosecution said, those women were not going to convict this man. When a juror can go from thinking someone is guilty of Murder 2 and changing their mind to not guilty in a matter of hours that speaks volumes to me.
I wish the juror didn't speak at all and just let us speculate. She proved that whole "judged by your peers" mess is bs. How was that jury George Zimmerman's peers? Why wasn't at least one of Trayvon's peers on that jury?
We not safe out here
I wish the juror didn't speak at all and just let us speculate. She proved that whole "judged by your peers" mess is bs. How was that jury George Zimmerman's peers? Why wasn't at least one of Trayvon's peers on that jury?
We not safe out here
- 56,266
- 64,763
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
Amazing how stupid some of you are.
So because you were found not guilty because of reasonable doubt that means you're innocent
They just use that argument when it fits something they believe in.
Innocent people get convicted all the time, and guilty people get off, because our legal system is far from 100%....even though it's the best on earth
- 11,996
- 3,286
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
Is GZ really doing a civil suit against TM's parents? 
ice city fc
Banned
- 5,031
- 2,109
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2013
Assuming you don't have white skin, we were never safe here. The system can't fail those it was never intended to serve.After that juror interview, how could anyone think this was truly a fair trial? Her opening sentence was bias. IMO it didn't matter what the prosecution said, those women were not going to convict this man. When a juror can go from thinking someone is guilty of Murder 2 and changing their mind to not guilty in a matter of hours that speaks volumes to me.
I wish the juror didn't speak at all and just let us speculate. She proved that whole "judged by your peers" mess is bs. How was that jury George Zimmerman's peers? Why wasn't at least one of Trayvon's peers on that jury?
We not safe out here
- 1,391
- 172
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2002
Not denying that bruh. Do you have PROOF casey anthony killed her daughter?
Not saying she did. Personally I believe she did. The court however said she was innocent.
- 20,204
- 4,188
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
I just think its weird that there was no Black jurors considering that Samford is 30 percent Black,
Also that there were no men jurors either
Also that there were no men jurors either
- 1,391
- 172
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2002
Is GZ really doing a civil suit against TM's parents?
That website is fake.
