- 4,994
- 6,094
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2018
She must date brothers because I don't know many older white men into R'er.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
i don't understand this about the 4th videoJurors saw enough and didn't want to see anymore
i don't understand this about the 4th video
i don't understand this about the 4th video
not sure if the court had the tape or they knew of the tape. Think the obstruction charge has to do with the tape that wasn't played...Jurors acquitted him of a fourth child pornography charge involving a tape that Jane and prosecutors said showed Kelly having a threesome with Jane and his ex-girlfriend,
Lisa Van Allen, but that tape was not shown in court. Prosecutors had argued that's because Kelly and his team successfully covered it up.
so this is not the video tape of that girl in his first trial this is another girl in a different video tape?
Jane had denied for years that Kelly abused her, but now says Kelly intimidated her and her family, and paid them off to keep his abuse secret. She now says she was the person in the video at the center of Kelly's 2008 child pornography trial in Cook County, and has told the jury Kelly recorded her on other videos shown in court.
Jesus. In the midst of all this didn't even know his goddaughter was one of the victims.
There is a minimum of evidence you need to see in order to find him guilty and give x amount of years. If the 3 videos are all you need to find him guilty with a min of 10 and a max of 90, why put yourself through this additional ordeal of watching a 4th? He is 50 years old and already serving time on similar charges in NY. The chances of him getting the minimum 10 is slim to none. So if he gets 20-30 years, he will still be in prison and/or be dead by then.i don't understand this about the 4th video