Rugby Star Facing Charges of Axing 3 People to Death! Guess Why He Did It!?

Originally Posted by LarryDavidSwag

Originally Posted by sn00pee

See.


SEE WHAT? ARTICLES WHICH ARE NOT VAUGE?

roll.gif


you're madd funny dude.


Exactly.... Pressed to say I told you so like the point wasn't already clarified....

Reminds me of one of my old chicks...
 
Originally Posted by LarryDavidSwag

Originally Posted by sn00pee

See.


SEE WHAT? ARTICLES WHICH ARE NOT VAUGE?

roll.gif


you're madd funny dude.


Exactly.... Pressed to say I told you so like the point wasn't already clarified....

Reminds me of one of my old chicks...
 
Originally Posted by AirJapan707

If what happened to his daughter is true then I'm not even mad.
Edit: Just saw the latest article.

I wondered what made him go off on his teammates.
 
Originally Posted by AirJapan707

If what happened to his daughter is true then I'm not even mad.
Edit: Just saw the latest article.

I wondered what made him go off on his teammates.
 
Originally Posted by YoUNg bR3aD

Originally Posted by LarryDavidSwag

Originally Posted by sn00pee

See.


SEE WHAT? ARTICLES WHICH ARE NOT VAUGE?


Exactly.... Pressed to say I told you so



"i cannot understand if the victims are innocent or guilty.....the article is too vauge"

"thats what news is supposed to be"

*dirty posts two new, more informative, less vauge articles giving clarity to the exact issue i was confused by*

"SEE?!?!?"


roll.gif


i see that i can understand and comprehend less vauge articles, that's about it.

who's angry?

very slightly frustrated by idocy,

MAYBE,

angry?

because you dont understand the concept of vauge and why it's bad writing, in general, let alone in a news article?

never.
 
Originally Posted by YoUNg bR3aD

Originally Posted by LarryDavidSwag

Originally Posted by sn00pee

See.


SEE WHAT? ARTICLES WHICH ARE NOT VAUGE?


Exactly.... Pressed to say I told you so



"i cannot understand if the victims are innocent or guilty.....the article is too vauge"

"thats what news is supposed to be"

*dirty posts two new, more informative, less vauge articles giving clarity to the exact issue i was confused by*

"SEE?!?!?"


roll.gif


i see that i can understand and comprehend less vauge articles, that's about it.

who's angry?

very slightly frustrated by idocy,

MAYBE,

angry?

because you dont understand the concept of vauge and why it's bad writing, in general, let alone in a news article?

never.
 
You still dont get it. The reason its "vague" is because it was a developing story with not a lot of facts.
They just cant say the dudes were innocent, nor could they say they were guilty.
It really doesn't take rocket science LDS...
 
You still dont get it. The reason its "vague" is because it was a developing story with not a lot of facts.
They just cant say the dudes were innocent, nor could they say they were guilty.
It really doesn't take rocket science LDS...
 
....vague means they didnt say *%$*.

they said neither "the victims are suspects" nor "the victims are innocent"

all they said was "a psycho man was attacking people because he said they raped his daughter"

they insinuated both, that the man was attacking men who raped his daughter AND men who hadn't raped his daughter

the article is poorly written and lacks clarity concerning that matter.

i mean, they didnt even ASK the victims if they had been involved

a simple "ive never seen or heard of this man in my life" would have sufficed.

there is absolutely nothing you're going to say that will change the poorly written article from vague to clear.

we are seriously arguing over how vague i found a news article?


EDIT:

roll.gif
, i mean, one of the sentences reads "A man reported to have escaped from being killed said his attacker said he was avenging the rape of his daughter"

"a man said that his attacker said that"

roll.gif
, that's like high-school level writing, dude.

they NEVER clarified if this guy was a psycho killing innocent people OR actually attacking people responsible for his 'daughters' rape...

they didn't even mention that it was up in the air and noone knows yet

you know why?

CAUSE ITS VAGUE AND POORLY WRITTEN
 
....vague means they didnt say *%$*.

they said neither "the victims are suspects" nor "the victims are innocent"

all they said was "a psycho man was attacking people because he said they raped his daughter"

they insinuated both, that the man was attacking men who raped his daughter AND men who hadn't raped his daughter

the article is poorly written and lacks clarity concerning that matter.

i mean, they didnt even ASK the victims if they had been involved

a simple "ive never seen or heard of this man in my life" would have sufficed.

there is absolutely nothing you're going to say that will change the poorly written article from vague to clear.

we are seriously arguing over how vague i found a news article?


EDIT:

roll.gif
, i mean, one of the sentences reads "A man reported to have escaped from being killed said his attacker said he was avenging the rape of his daughter"

"a man said that his attacker said that"

roll.gif
, that's like high-school level writing, dude.

they NEVER clarified if this guy was a psycho killing innocent people OR actually attacking people responsible for his 'daughters' rape...

they didn't even mention that it was up in the air and noone knows yet

you know why?

CAUSE ITS VAGUE AND POORLY WRITTEN
 
Originally Posted by ricky409

i dont have a daughter so i really cant say "i see where he coming from"...


you cant even imagine what it must feel like to find out your daughter has been raped and infected with AIDS?

then again, that's called perspective.

thanks for telling us you dont have it.
 
Originally Posted by ricky409

i dont have a daughter so i really cant say "i see where he coming from"...


you cant even imagine what it must feel like to find out your daughter has been raped and infected with AIDS?

then again, that's called perspective.

thanks for telling us you dont have it.
 
Originally Posted by LarryDavidSwag

Originally Posted by ricky409

i dont have a daughter so i really cant say "i see where he coming from"...


you cant even imagine what it must feel like to find out your daughter has been raped and infected with AIDS?

then again, that's called perspective.

thanks for telling us you dont have it.


   ummm... okay?

again... i cant wrap my brain around that feeling, because i dont have kids...

just like i cant wrap my brain around how much love for children parents can have...

again... because i dont have kids....

i'm not going to condone something if i dont understand it...

ohwell.gif
ohwell.gif
 
Originally Posted by LarryDavidSwag

Originally Posted by ricky409

i dont have a daughter so i really cant say "i see where he coming from"...


you cant even imagine what it must feel like to find out your daughter has been raped and infected with AIDS?

then again, that's called perspective.

thanks for telling us you dont have it.


   ummm... okay?

again... i cant wrap my brain around that feeling, because i dont have kids...

just like i cant wrap my brain around how much love for children parents can have...

again... because i dont have kids....

i'm not going to condone something if i dont understand it...

ohwell.gif
ohwell.gif
 
Originally Posted by AirJapan707

If what happened to his daughter is true then I'm not even mad.
word, but i woulda tortured em 1st. tie em up & burn em wit hot knives, put broomsticks up they %%#, tie meat to they penis & make my pit bite it, u know crazy #@!# like that. then i woulda cut em up

  
 
Originally Posted by AirJapan707

If what happened to his daughter is true then I'm not even mad.
word, but i woulda tortured em 1st. tie em up & burn em wit hot knives, put broomsticks up they %%#, tie meat to they penis & make my pit bite it, u know crazy #@!# like that. then i woulda cut em up

  
 
Originally Posted by eashawty

AirJapan707 wrote:

If what happened to his daughter is true then I'm not even mad.
word, but i woulda tortured em 1st. tie em up & burn em wit hot knives, put broomsticks up they $#$, tie meat to they penis & make my pit bite it, u know crazy %+#@ like that. then i woulda cut em up

  


M-E-T-H-O-D Man?
 
Originally Posted by eashawty

AirJapan707 wrote:

If what happened to his daughter is true then I'm not even mad.
word, but i woulda tortured em 1st. tie em up & burn em wit hot knives, put broomsticks up they $#$, tie meat to they penis & make my pit bite it, u know crazy %+#@ like that. then i woulda cut em up

  


M-E-T-H-O-D Man?
 
Back
Top Bottom