Shooting Reported at Las Vegas Casino Hotel

It's shocking to me that because you don't exercise a particular right that you should be able to demand that others stop exercising theirs. Not sure if serious or dumb. I agree that their needs to be some regulation to gun ownership, but to demand that they take away your right altogether ???? Some of y'all are no different than Trump who y'all despise
Name specifically who you are talking to, because not all the dudes arguing for gun control is saying take away people's gun and ban them.

The ban all guns dudes are in the minority.
 
Dudes really think they'll be able to resist "government enslavement" with their trusty ar-15?

You can't be that dumb fam.
For someone who posts like he's an enlightened black brother, you sounding like a save Me Mr White man cat

i agree buts its also dumb to not want to do anything about it
Pretty certain I said that some form of regulation needs to be done
 


i'm just saying.. when the san bernardino thing happened the initial report was 3 males dressed in military gear shooting up the place (reported by multiple news channels) then it changed to the muslim couple..
 
For someone who posts like he's an enlightened black brother, you sounding like a save Me Mr White man cat

Pretty certain I said that some form of regulation needs to be done
i didnt mean it directed at you, just like i didnt take your comment directed at me
 
And there's the problem right there. You can't just look at someone and ask them a couple questions and confirm "yep he's good, he'll never murder people with these weapons"
How many people are legally sold guns that seem completely sane but have horrible intentions either before or after buying? Probably a lot.
That's what we have background checks for. Everyone has to do them when buying a gun from an FFL (registered firearms dealer).
Clearly a background check can't stop crimes like this where it is someone's first offense- no criminal history. Also, if the guns are stolen or obtained from private sales, that bypasses that process entirely. So while it may be attractive to add more and more restrictions and checks to the gun buying process, it will only really affect those who are buying guns from an FFL.
Private sales are extremely difficult to limit or even monitor... unless you have the oppressive government situation y'all are laughing off.

dudes gotta realize if our govt decided to "enslave" us your gun ain't stopping those tanks and drones doggy
Right, which is why guerrillas never fight conventionally- it would be obvious suicide against an enemy with a huge equipment advantage. I agree that the odds of the government winning would be likely, but just think about the example I listed earlier:
You're probably about to say "what can a rifle do against a country that has the most powerful military on earth?" I dunno, ask those guys in Afghanistan. They're still there after 9 years fighting the Soviets (also a strong military) and 15 years fighting us, using only rifles and improvised weapons.
Let me reiterate again that I hope that situation never happens here. Just trying to point out that military might can at least be dulled to a stalemate against an underequipped but determined group.
 
Last edited:
You should have the right to buy one weapon for your protection at home, nothing else nothing more.

Going out and buying 40 weapons... come on now there is something wrong with that practice.

I said it earlier, but why do we allow people to buy so much damn ammo and so easily? In the state of Oregon we can no longer buy sudafed because of all the meth and in Washington one needs to show ID and is only allowed a limited amount. YET I can swing by Walmart on my way home and buy all the ammo I want with cash and no one would know.
 
Untitled.png

I cant even imagine man :{ :(
 
This isn't 1776. Today, any firearm compared to the type of weapons the government possess - calling it a "fighting chance" is laughable. It's like throwing a sheep to fight a tiger and saying that the sheep has a chance because it has hooves.
You cannot be serious and the man dem who repped you are just as clueless
 
It's shocking to me that because you don't exercise a particular right that you should be able to demand that others stop exercising theirs. Not sure if serious or dumb. I agree that their needs to be some regulation to gun ownership, but to demand that they take away your right altogether ???? Some of y'all are no different than Trump who y'all despise

Who said that?
 
2nd shooter conspiracy is really dumb.

If there was another shooter on the 4th floor wouldn't there be broken windows where the person was shooting?

Dudes tinfoil hats are too tight.
 
So anyone think there was more than one shooter? There are videos that show what looks like a muzzle going off from 4th or 5th floor.


and they're lying about it because.......?







Beats me. Just stay woke.


Except for the fact that several concert goers said they saw the flash on the 4th floor several hours before the shooting, even going back to the day before.

Stay woke though...
Morons.

Idk if there was or wasnt, but to entertain that there possibly could have been. At the end of this video (1:07) it sounds like there could be 2, 1 with a loud sound and a lower thud kind of one.

Now i dnt know jack s*** about guns so if they echo and thats it then disregard but if its not echo or w/e what could that lower sound be?


 
someone posted a video in the earlier pages and you can hear the bullets hitting the asphalt around the guy recording, maybe that? how loud it is though i couldnt tell you

If you go back to the cab video though you can hear the lower sounding gun shots
 
That's what we have background checks for. Everyone has to do them when buying a gun from an FFL (registered firearms dealer).
Clearly a background check can't stop crimes like this where it is someone's first offense- no criminal history. Also, if the guns are stolen or obtained from private sales, that bypasses that process entirely. So while it may be attractive to add more and more restrictions and checks to the gun buying process, it will only really affect those who are buying guns from an FFL.
Private sales are extremely difficult to limit or even monitor... unless you have the oppressive government situation y'all are laughing off.


Right, which is why guerrillas never fight conventionally- it would be obvious suicide against an enemy with a huge equipment advantage. I agree that the odds of the government winning would be likely, but just think about the example I listed earlier:

Let me reiterate again that I hope that situation never happens here. Just trying to point out that military might can at least be dulled to a stalemate against an underequipped but determined group.

you're clearly delusional.
 
How do such pictures of the room even get leaked though. They had them on yahoo this morning
 
Except for the fact that several concert goers said they saw the flash on the 4th floor several hours before the shooting, even going back to the day before.

Stay woke though...
Morons.

Did I saw this was confirmed? Just came up on my twitter feed and I just asked if anyone heard about the multiple shooters.

Sadly, the facts I do know is many people were hurt and killed everything else I take with a grain of salt. I'm cool if that makes me a moron tho :rolleyes.


Can't I'm a Toys R' Us kid.

Jimmies rustled for me just asking asking a question about a current topic on an online forum. :lol:
 
The full might of the military has not been unleashed on ISIS/ISIL

Second, this argument of a military takeover is really a far out talking point.
 
Why do people think the government would have a ground war with them?
 
The full might of the military has not been unleashed on ISIS/ISIL

Second, this argument of a military takeover is really a far out talking point.
It is, and I only introduced it to give this thread some sort of direction as far as the original intent.

Like I said, I don't think it's very realistic, but I think it has a valid role in the discussion, and if it doesn't explain to me when things changed and we began seeing government as benevolent caretakers and not hedging against some form of tyranny (which isn't as ridiculous as it would have been a year ago.
 
Back
Top Bottom