- Oct 10, 2008
- 10,756
- 9,096
a few in the past
yea thats stupid imo
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
a few in the past
Name specifically who you are talking to, because not all the dudes arguing for gun control is saying take away people's gun and ban them.It's shocking to me that because you don't exercise a particular right that you should be able to demand that others stop exercising theirs. Not sure if serious or dumb. I agree that their needs to be some regulation to gun ownership, but to demand that they take away your right altogether ???? Some of y'all are no different than Trump who y'all despise
Who's mans is this
For someone who posts like he's an enlightened black brother, you sounding like a save Me Mr White man catDudes really think they'll be able to resist "government enslavement" with their trusty ar-15?
You can't be that dumb fam.
Pretty certain I said that some form of regulation needs to be donei agree buts its also dumb to not want to do anything about it
i didnt mean it directed at you, just like i didnt take your comment directed at meFor someone who posts like he's an enlightened black brother, you sounding like a save Me Mr White man cat
Pretty certain I said that some form of regulation needs to be done
That's what we have background checks for. Everyone has to do them when buying a gun from an FFL (registered firearms dealer).And there's the problem right there. You can't just look at someone and ask them a couple questions and confirm "yep he's good, he'll never murder people with these weapons"
How many people are legally sold guns that seem completely sane but have horrible intentions either before or after buying? Probably a lot.
Right, which is why guerrillas never fight conventionally- it would be obvious suicide against an enemy with a huge equipment advantage. I agree that the odds of the government winning would be likely, but just think about the example I listed earlier:dudes gotta realize if our govt decided to "enslave" us your gun ain't stopping those tanks and drones doggy
Let me reiterate again that I hope that situation never happens here. Just trying to point out that military might can at least be dulled to a stalemate against an underequipped but determined group.You're probably about to say "what can a rifle do against a country that has the most powerful military on earth?" I dunno, ask those guys in Afghanistan. They're still there after 9 years fighting the Soviets (also a strong military) and 15 years fighting us, using only rifles and improvised weapons.
You should have the right to buy one weapon for your protection at home, nothing else nothing more.
Going out and buying 40 weapons... come on now there is something wrong with that practice.
This isn't 1776. Today, any firearm compared to the type of weapons the government possess - calling it a "fighting chance" is laughable. It's like throwing a sheep to fight a tiger and saying that the sheep has a chance because it has hooves.
You cannot be serious and the man dem who repped you are just as cluelessThis isn't 1776. Today, any firearm compared to the type of weapons the government possess - calling it a "fighting chance" is laughable. It's like throwing a sheep to fight a tiger and saying that the sheep has a chance because it has hooves.
It's shocking to me that because you don't exercise a particular right that you should be able to demand that others stop exercising theirs. Not sure if serious or dumb. I agree that their needs to be some regulation to gun ownership, but to demand that they take away your right altogether ???? Some of y'all are no different than Trump who y'all despise
So anyone think there was more than one shooter? There are videos that show what looks like a muzzle going off from 4th or 5th floor.
yes.
and they're lying about it because.......?
Beats me. Just stay woke.
Except for the fact that several concert goers said they saw the flash on the 4th floor several hours before the shooting, even going back to the day before.
Stay woke though...
Morons.
This analogy was terrible
You cannot be serious and the man dem who repped you are just as clueless
That's what we have background checks for. Everyone has to do them when buying a gun from an FFL (registered firearms dealer).
Clearly a background check can't stop crimes like this where it is someone's first offense- no criminal history. Also, if the guns are stolen or obtained from private sales, that bypasses that process entirely. So while it may be attractive to add more and more restrictions and checks to the gun buying process, it will only really affect those who are buying guns from an FFL.
Private sales are extremely difficult to limit or even monitor... unless you have the oppressive government situation y'all are laughing off.
Right, which is why guerrillas never fight conventionally- it would be obvious suicide against an enemy with a huge equipment advantage. I agree that the odds of the government winning would be likely, but just think about the example I listed earlier:
Let me reiterate again that I hope that situation never happens here. Just trying to point out that military might can at least be dulled to a stalemate against an underequipped but determined group.
You cannot be serious and the man dem who repped you are just as clueless
you're clearly delusional.
Except for the fact that several concert goers said they saw the flash on the 4th floor several hours before the shooting, even going back to the day before.
Stay woke though...
Morons.
Grow up.
It is, and I only introduced it to give this thread some sort of direction as far as the original intent.The full might of the military has not been unleashed on ISIS/ISIL
Second, this argument of a military takeover is really a far out talking point.