- 792
- 194
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2012
Oh and by the way, NONE of those 4 rings were successfully defended.
[:: SPURS (4) vs. LAKERS (0) 1st Round Thread | Spurs Win, Congrats ::]
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by licensed to ball,
- Start date
jerrel45
Banned
- 72
- 19
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
Lol at the laker fans. I guess lol at kobe fans claiming to be laker fans. Smh
jerrel45
Banned
- 72
- 19
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
Lol at the laker fans. I guess lol at kobe fans claiming to be laker fans. Smh
- 792
- 194
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2012
Hell naw.
Name on the front > name on the back.
Im 33 yrs old. I watched Showtime.
I am a LAKER fan.
Do Idolize Kobe? Hell yeah.
At least I aint frontin.
Name on the front > name on the back.
Im 33 yrs old. I watched Showtime.
I am a LAKER fan.
Do Idolize Kobe? Hell yeah.
At least I aint frontin.
- 12,641
- 6,090
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2010
jerrel45
Banned
- 72
- 19
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
how you going to post a tmac hurt picture then laugh at it when kobe just got hurt? Lol smh. These "laker" fans
- 792
- 194
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2012
Tmac is Mr. Glass anyway.
jerrel45
Banned
- 72
- 19
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
Ok but why laugh at him? I guess its ok since hes not your favorite player, right? Smh. Lol u clowns are funny. I wonder what would happen if lebron was hurt.
the return
Banned
- 200
- 78
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2013
- 792
- 194
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2012
Naw. Im not particular about Tmac.
Im neutral about dude.
No positive or negative feedback.
Calling him Mr. Glass was simply an observation.
Im neutral about dude.
No positive or negative feedback.
Calling him Mr. Glass was simply an observation.
- 792
- 194
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2012
Dont care about individual stats.
Like I just said... Name on front of jersey > name on back of jersey.
What else ya got homes?
- 12,641
- 6,090
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2010
I just ignore it now. Its playoff time I cant feed into it, its winning time.
- 36,045
- 12,024
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
im saying though... kobe's stint on the lakers >>>> duncans stint on the spurs
5 > 4
if you're not first you're last
- 792
- 194
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2012
antidope
Supporter
- 63,229
- 67,347
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2012
The difference between these is so minor that I would take either of them. That one ring isnt automatically swaying me.
You guys were having a player vs player argument how would the players not take precedent over the team?
LOL at people constantly using the "The Lakers are more successful ever" thing. A lot of us werent even alive for those. They are not relevant in this conversation
I want no parts of this conversation BTW
- 792
- 194
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2012
Player vs player?
Did I even mention Kobe once in my posts?
Nope.
He brought up the Finals MVP thing.
For the record though, team wise 5 > 4.
One ring aint enough to sway you?
You lyin to yourself dogg.
I would take 5 over 4 any day.
- 11,120
- 3,734
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2008
I actually want to see T-mac do good but only him not the whole team 
antidope
Supporter
- 63,229
- 67,347
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2012
Everyone else did, it was a player Vs. player argument.
One ring wouldnt be enough to sway me when the 4 rings guy is going down as the best to ever do it at his position while no matter what the 5 ring guy did people will always say the highest he could be is #2. It all depends on what you're looking for out of a career. After 4 rings it becomes almost negligible anyways because then it all becomes about comparing x player to y player.
I would pick either career.
One ring wouldnt be enough to sway me when the 4 rings guy is going down as the best to ever do it at his position while no matter what the 5 ring guy did people will always say the highest he could be is #2. It all depends on what you're looking for out of a career. After 4 rings it becomes almost negligible anyways because then it all becomes about comparing x player to y player.
I would pick either career.
- 792
- 194
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2012
I dont care about Duncan or Kobe or their careers.
Im talkin about franchises as a whole.
And I even kept it perspective and made it fair by just counting since '99.
If you cool with 4 thats all you.
I already stated team > player.
If Kobe leaves I aint followin him.
I be stayin purple and gold.
Im talkin about franchises as a whole.
And I even kept it perspective and made it fair by just counting since '99.
If you cool with 4 thats all you.
I already stated team > player.
If Kobe leaves I aint followin him.
I be stayin purple and gold.
antidope
Supporter
- 63,229
- 67,347
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2012
See thats where I was confused. Everyone else was having a player vs player argument and you're talking about franchises. My mistake
- 21,784
- 2,957
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2007
No one is going to take the Spurs' achievements over the Lakers from '99 to present day, that's just a joke. Spurs' case is indefensible.
- 6,346
- 1,111
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2007
the problem is everybody wants to talk about players vs players
dudes forget it's a team game, everything is individualized (not just in sports either)
- 1,225
- 341
- Joined
- May 25, 2012
Obviously, 5 championships outweighs 4. No one can deny this.
The way I look at it, Spurs did a better job with what they were given. Small market team winning 4 championships in the span they did is unheard of in the NBA. They never land any superstars in trades, never acquire any big names in free agency, have good management, best coach in the NBA, and have a great system overall. The Lakers have always been in a much better situation to succeed since 99, and have done that. But the Spurs have overachieved big time and are still doing that to this day.
- 12,209
- 277
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2008
LOL. Must be amateur hour in here.
- 1,225
- 341
- Joined
- May 25, 2012
Last edited:
