peter80warrick wrote:
would rather pay for my own shoes than to have an adidas or reebok sponsorship
I get Reebok, but what's wrong w. adidas?
*edit*
Speaking of companies, I had no clue that UA was in the bidding for the NFL apparrell/jersey liscense (sp?). The rise of this company has been nothing short of amazing.
Didn't even see peter80warrick's comment, but I definitely agree. All the new addidas stuff looks so gimmicky & so 90's lookin'. Do they have to slap the 3 stripes on everything? They have no concept of subtltey...
UA has come a long way pretty fast but I still won't rock their stuff. Strictly Nike for me. I saw this warning on UA's website for their men's v-neck tee, "
WARNING! This product will melt when exposed to extreme heat or open flames, posing a risk of serious injury where melted product comes into contact with skin!" Link to product
here. I now polyester in general is more flammable than cotton but if you legally need to post such a warning on your products, you got problems....
As far as I'm concerned, no company should be able to oufit any league besides Nike. End of story.
I wish the best for Philbin. He's paid his dues & experienced a lot of success these last several years. I hope he doesn't become the latest coordinator to prove he's not a good HC.