- 6,557
- 1,188
I have to see this movie again.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How did this not beat avengers?
Btw I thought avengers was terrible
3-D prices and GA prices make a huge difference as well..Its quite easy. This is not a kids batman.
Kids are the money generator for the movies.
C. Nolan does not strike me as the kid friendly director. His movies really make you think.
Just got back from seeing it a second time, man it was just as good this time around. I still hold the thought that this movie is better than TDK and that's huge for me because TDK is one of my favorite movies ever. Just too spectacular on so many scales, Nolan can do no wrong.
Anne Hathaway was even prettier this time around
That sewer fight...... my goodness again. Too many notable quotes from Bane, the swagger was just stupid.
And at the very end, just to reiterate, there is in my mind absolutely no way that Alfred is envisioning them there. They are actually there. Why in the world would it make sense that Alfred would picture Selina there when he's only seen her once in the movie and even that one time was just a very quick 'bring the food up to his room, lock the door.' If Nolan wanted us to think Bruce was actually dead Rachel would've been with him at the restaurant.
Man they mentioned that auto pilot waay too many times for Bruce to die. It would have been more powerful if he did though.
Also how much time was left on the bomb when Batman finally got a hold of it? I can't remember it was 5 minutes or 2
The real question is not Avengers vs Batman.
More like.
Scarlett Jo vs Anne Hathaway in their leather suits.
The real question is not Avengers vs Batman.
More like.
Scarlett Jo vs Anne Hathaway in their leather suits.
I know I was just saying cause earlier in this thread some dudes kept insisting that Alfred was dreaming or some @#$# lol. Yeah it would have been very powerful if he did die. I remember when I watched this movie on Friday that scene at the funeral with Alfred crying almost got me, @#$# was sad b.
And he got it with 2 minutes. Probably less since he made out with Anne and had to talk to Gordon for forever lol.
obviously I meant IMO.
dudes want this entire thread to be that was the best
it's a discussion. I, ME, think it's madness. doesn't mean i look down on anyone who likes it better. I think it could have been better than TDK. It had the opportunity to be better. Which speaks volumes because Its very hard to follow up TDK and I had low expectation for this one
and no The joker performance was not the only thing that made that movie better
Saying Nolan doesn't follow comics just makes everything you've posted null and void as its obvious i'm dealing with an amateur. I pointed out SPECIFIC portions from the comic books that Nolan recreated in all 3 movies yet you want to boldly say Nolan doesn't follow comics? Okay.....And Raimi's Spiderman was a joke. Mark Webb's ASM $hitted all over that trilogy by staying true.
Nolan respected and admired the comics. He did his best to stay as true to it as possible while making his Batman. He's stated himself the inspirations for many of the movies parts from the comics. If you're too blind to see the correlation between the Dark Knight Rises and the Dark Knight Returns then there's no point in discussing it any further because you're out of your league and obviously not into comics or a batman fan.
And no the world's not going to end because it's not true to the comic because no comic book movie is. But what you're stating is beyond ridiculous. Why is he older? He can't be younger just because there was no other actor playing a younger Bane in the flashback? It makes no sense. If you ask the average movie fan who saw this and ask them why they think Bane beat Batman the first time I guarantee everyone will state it's because Bruce is older and Bane is younger and stronger. Plain and simple. The "Robin" was to appease fans as an Easter egg. Of course Robin's name isn't Robin but it just leaves a window open. They always stated there would never be a Robin. Blake was always that secret prize easter egg. Nolan could've gone any way about stating who John Blake was alluded to being, either by making his real name John Richard Grayson or just Richard Grayson but he chose the simple and most obvious as the final hidden gem.
How can you guys go back and watch a film in the cinemas twice?
It asks you to suspend disbelief far more than the first two movies. It really does.
Nolan got his accolades by making two realistic batman movies. It's natural for people to be surprised when the third is more comic booky.
The most important part to me was always going to be the ending. And he nailed it So I am happy and content enough to watch it over and over.
But saying this is better than TDK is madness. Just too messy. The pacing was better in Rises though I'll give it that. Plus it had more epic moments
I'm a little let down by Gotham itself. Pittsburgh just didn't really do it for me. Should just be NYC or Chicago...