- 68,176
- 24,538
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2008
not really considering it was brought up on this page again
The NBA Draft Thread
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by pmatic,
- Start date
not really considering it was brought up on this page again
- 1,562
- 882
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2012
UW was the very first to discover him on accident while he was on the dematha JV team and recruited him HARD before his growth spurt.. he also didn't expect dejounte murray and marquese chriss to declare for the draft after one year.
- 71,671
- 114,573
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
Washington was also predicted to finish 2nd to last I believe in the preseason Pac-12 polls despite everyone knowing that they had a top 3 pick. Shows how awful the talent was there.
- 22,188
- 63,105
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2017
At least Simmons had another fellow 5 star (Blakeney) and another pro (Quarterman) with him @ LSU.
Fultz had David Crisp.
Fultz had David Crisp.
Last edited:
- 6,219
- 1,943
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2010
The state of Washington as a whole has been dissapointing these last few years Wash St not sniffing any talent
- 33,347
- 15,147
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
Sixers working out Monk on Thursday. Their first workout with any of the top 10 prospects.
- 68,176
- 24,538
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2008
best case if they convince the Kings Fox won't be there at #5
Last edited:
lightweight champion
Banned
- 13,481
- 5,271
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2007
Kings need everything though so whether Fox is there at #5 or not shouldn't matter 
- 23,340
- 5,916
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2011
Yea idk why ppl think we have any leverage on ANY of the teams beneath us in the draft. I feel like most teams KNOW we wanna get rid of that pick
- 68,176
- 24,538
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2008
Kings need everything though so whether Fox is there at #5 or not shouldn't matter
I get that but if they think Fox is a legit franchise player, which I do then they will give up what they have to do to get him
I would love Fox at #3 and you buy a shooter
you have leverage because you can take Fox and trade him
Last edited:
- 23,340
- 5,916
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2011
BC too dumb to pull off the Hinkie, Elfrid for Saric kinda trade
- 68,176
- 24,538
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2008
I def agree there but I feel like if you are able to convince them you are taking him at #3 then you can work something out
- 23,340
- 5,916
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2011
- 68,176
- 24,538
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2008
Yea i see that now but to my point, im scared to see what he would work out
I am so torn on what I think of BC as a GM
I feel like he can draft but his free agent signings scare me, I would LOVE Patty Mills next to Ben though
- 23,340
- 5,916
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2011
I am so torn on what I think of BC as a GM
I feel like he can draft but his free agent signings scare me, I would LOVE Patty Mills next to Ben though
I dont trust him & his trading. Mills would be great next to Simmons tho
- 71,671
- 114,573
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
I feel like I would just take Fox or Jackson if I were Philly. They can always just overpay for a shooter/3pt specialist in free agency if that's what they want. I'd rather take my chances on one of the more well rounded prospects with the higher ceiling instead of the perceived better fit.
- 34,943
- 26,596
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
whats the sixers consensus on Covington?
- 33,347
- 15,147
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
Well he was literally the top ranked perimeter defender in the league this past year and is probably our top outside shooter on the team right now but I think they view him more as a trade piece to get somebody more talented in that spot. I would love to keep him to bring him off the bench as our 6-7th man but he's probably gonna get paid a lot of money next summer.
He's basically a better defensive version of Allen Crabbe before the big contract.
Last edited:
- 23,340
- 5,916
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2011
If Covington plays the way he played in 2nd half of the yr then id be fine keeping him off the bench but he cant be our starting SF. Hes not THAT good
whiplashtw03
Banned
- 4,934
- 2,215
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2015
Looks like Josh Jackson or Fox going to the Lakers.
You can pretty much scratch Ball off the Laker list.
It's either Fox or Jackson. Jackson's ability to guard 1-4 is a premium in today's game. Fox's ability to penetrate at will, attack the basket, his floater game, and his ever improving outside shot puts him well above Ball.
You can pretty much scratch Ball off the Laker list.
It's either Fox or Jackson. Jackson's ability to guard 1-4 is a premium in today's game. Fox's ability to penetrate at will, attack the basket, his floater game, and his ever improving outside shot puts him well above Ball.
Last edited:
- 71,671
- 114,573
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
I actually agree with all of this
- 23,687
- 30,770
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2017
I like Fox attitude
MVP
Supporter
- 82,595
- 84,563
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
Lonzo to the Lakers confirmed. 
whiplashtw03
Banned
- 4,934
- 2,215
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2015
1. BOS - Fultz
2. LAL - Jackson or Fox
3. PHI - Ball
4. PHX - Jackson or Fox
5. SAC - Isaac
6. ORL - Monk
7. MIN - Tatum
8. NYK - Smith Jr
9. DAL - Markkanen
10. SAC - Jackson, NC
28. LAL - Swanigan or Thornwell
2. LAL - Jackson or Fox
3. PHI - Ball
4. PHX - Jackson or Fox
5. SAC - Isaac
6. ORL - Monk
7. MIN - Tatum
8. NYK - Smith Jr
9. DAL - Markkanen
10. SAC - Jackson, NC
28. LAL - Swanigan or Thornwell
Then change your avi back to Ball.Lonzo to the Lakers confirmed.
- 23,687
- 30,770
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2017
Lonzo to the Lakers confirmed.
Similar threads
