- 1,931
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2008
You can use that money you save on a few mods and thennnnn
the New Mustang vs the new M3
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by flaming hot cheetos,
- Start date
You can use that money you save on a few mods and thennnnn
- 301
- 10
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
you must forgot this was nt
- 11,315
- 57
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2004
- 11,513
- 51
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2007
Reliability >_
hieu23
Banned
- 2,366
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2009
bmw gets the classy/cool vote though.
- 1,931
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2008
I know, I cant wait for the Lulz from some.
- 5,270
- 11
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2006
m3 = instant class
mustang = ugly , cheap americans gas drinker
mustang = ugly , cheap americans gas drinker
- 11,315
- 57
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2004
FHC, there's your 1st lul
- 10,884
- 19
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2006
cant even compare these 2 cars tho....
- 797
- 12
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2004
Originally Posted by proper english
@ the weight
v8 M3s.. bring back the inline 6s
agreed, smh at these cars being more than 3500lbs. If either one of them were 3000-3300lbs then these would be some serious machines...the m3 would be an absolute #%! spanker while the mustang would be a hell of a thrill ride. still, they're great cars. Even if I could afford an M3, I'd still likely take the mustang and have no shame/worries making it my daily driver, where as I wouldn't want to put too many miles on the M3 in addition to its greater maintenance costs in the long run.
- 4,260
- 20
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2002
I got a feeling this thread is gonna turn ugly REALLY soon...
- 3,181
- 13
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2004
I thought I was going to come in here and see a video, this man put up a table -.-
- 180
- 26
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
*double posting* delete if needed.
- 180
- 26
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- 3,181
- 13
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2004
Hatchback, tiny 10'' rims... get out of here with that garbage. Look at where the antenna is located, that car is for dummies.
- 800
- 11
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2008
ill stick with the sti
baltimore
Banned
- 793
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
This and the M3 and mustang are trash. I'd rather buy a nsx at the M3 price and a s2k and mods for the mustang price.
- 17,144
- 1,167
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2005
I'd got with the Stang.
You can use that money you save on a few mods and thennnnn
Or take the almost extra 30K and buy a gently used Charger RT/SRT. I'll take that combo.
- 797
- 12
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2004
lol...my dude actually makes a good point. for the money i'd spend on an m3...might as well get somethin I'd absolutely love. While the NSX isn't as powerful, I've lusted after that car for a long time and would love to own one. Same with the S2K...instead of the stang, I'd get a clean S2K and a decent beater when I don't wanna roll the S2K.
- 15,762
- 517
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2005
Damn, NT'ers must be "ballin" to call both cars trash. What the heck do you guys drive?
iblink
Banned
- 6,497
- 468
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2008
exactly.
With that being said, the BMW M3 > My life
- 800
- 11
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2008
AWD>
baltimore
Banned
- 793
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
Yeah both of those are way over priced. The NSX with about 20K miles for $40K get a comptech supercharger, headers, exhaust, and a few more and you have a faster super car right there. The S2k with about 20K miles for $18K Get a vortech supercharger, or stage 2 inline turbo, mugen exhauset/headers/radiator, and some more boost and your killing it. Its stupid to pay 30K or 60K for a factory tuned car when you can mod it yourself.
baltimore
Banned
- 793
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
ah, I like fwd, rwd, or awd. Dont matter to me I like either one.
- 4,951
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2009
