- Feb 26, 2004
- 2,277
- 162
Tough call but personally, Dickson or Watson for me....Originally Posted by rck2sactown
Who to pick up with Fred Davis out:
Ed Dickson
Ben Watson
Anthony Fasano
Jared Cook
Greg Olsen
Tony Scheffler....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tough call but personally, Dickson or Watson for me....Originally Posted by rck2sactown
Who to pick up with Fred Davis out:
Ed Dickson
Ben Watson
Anthony Fasano
Jared Cook
Greg Olsen
Tony Scheffler....
I'd go Boldin (leaky Colts pass D) and Laurent.Originally Posted by Proshares
If I manage to snag Barber, I'm thinking about starting him over S Jax and maybe Benson. Good move?
WR help if you guys can give me some advice:
Boldin vs Indy
Washington vs NO
Miles/Laurent vs NYG
Which two should I bank on? I'm leaning Boldin/Laurent right now.
Originally Posted by mogzz04
Tough call but personally, Dickson or Watson for me....Originally Posted by rck2sactown
Who to pick up with Fred Davis out:
Ed Dickson
Ben Watson
Anthony Fasano
Jared Cook
Greg Olsen
Tony Scheffler....
Originally Posted by mogzz04
Tough call but personally, Dickson or Watson for me....Originally Posted by rck2sactown
Who to pick up with Fred Davis out:
Ed Dickson
Ben Watson
Anthony Fasano
Jared Cook
Greg Olsen
Tony Scheffler....
Murray, Jackson, White, Marshall,..........Benson???Originally Posted by toutle5
Pick 2 RB's, 2 WR's and a flex
Bradshaw vs Dallas
Murray vs NYG
Laurent Robinson vs NYG
SJax vs Seattle
Benson vs Houston
Marshall vs Philly
R. White vs Carolina
Thanks.
Murray, Jackson, White, Marshall,..........Benson???Originally Posted by toutle5
Pick 2 RB's, 2 WR's and a flex
Bradshaw vs Dallas
Murray vs NYG
Laurent Robinson vs NYG
SJax vs Seattle
Benson vs Houston
Marshall vs Philly
R. White vs Carolina
Thanks.
If Bradshaw plays the whole game, he is more versatile than Bush. With Oakland probably playing from behind as they did last week, there is less likelihood they can afford to pound with Bush. I have both as well and am leaning towards Bradshaw simply because he can likely run for 45-60, catch 3-5 balls for 40-50 yards and score a TD. Bush's line likely looks more like 85-95 yards rushing, 1 catch and possibly no TDs. Just my initial thoughts, but I could be absolutely wrong.Originally Posted by Cement Greyman
I'm kind of back and forth about playing M Bush or Bradshaw. I feel like this game is going to show how healthy Bradshaw really is, and he may put up nice numbers. I also feel like I need to use Bush because without Mcfadden he has excelled and once he returns his usefulness will take a hit. My league has this week and next until the playoffs and the worst I can do is lose out and end up with the 4th playoff spot. Any thoughts on Bradshaw vs. M Bush?
If Bradshaw plays the whole game, he is more versatile than Bush. With Oakland probably playing from behind as they did last week, there is less likelihood they can afford to pound with Bush. I have both as well and am leaning towards Bradshaw simply because he can likely run for 45-60, catch 3-5 balls for 40-50 yards and score a TD. Bush's line likely looks more like 85-95 yards rushing, 1 catch and possibly no TDs. Just my initial thoughts, but I could be absolutely wrong.Originally Posted by Cement Greyman
I'm kind of back and forth about playing M Bush or Bradshaw. I feel like this game is going to show how healthy Bradshaw really is, and he may put up nice numbers. I also feel like I need to use Bush because without Mcfadden he has excelled and once he returns his usefulness will take a hit. My league has this week and next until the playoffs and the worst I can do is lose out and end up with the 4th playoff spot. Any thoughts on Bradshaw vs. M Bush?