- 67,549
- 78,506
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
I personally like cp3s game more than nash too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I know we'll all be bouncing our kids on our knees telling them about the time that....
Jason Kidd beat the 2003 Detroit Pistons and then got swept in the finals.
Lead his team to 2 finals, won one with Dirk…
Meanwhile Nash never lead his teams anywhere
That was 02. They lost in 6 to SA in 03.I know we'll all be bouncing our kids on our knees telling them about the time that....
Jason Kidd beat the 2003 Detroit Pistons and then got swept in the finals.
Nasty work
Yah of course I for one remember exactly where I was when Jason Kidd beat the juggernaut 02 Celtics...I'll never forget it.
Nasty work
The irony of saying pace and Lionel Hollins, when Memphis let him go for grit and grind, along for not listening to Hollinger and his analytics, and said the eye test was better than numbers.77 Finals on NBA TV right now…Pace is crazy and Lionel Hollins was nice![]()
Nash was 9th in MVP voting when he was the age Kidd was when he won with the Mavs. He was better than Kidd at that age. He just happened to be playing with Marcia Gortat as the team’s leading scorer instead of DirkKidd over Nash because his offense is better than Nash's defense.
And sure, defense matters least at that position but you can see that its pretty much impossible to win a ring with weak point-of-attack defense. Kidd could guard 1-3 while Nash was a liability at every spot defensively.
And while sure, those Nets teams weren't very good and played in the weakest conference of my lifetime, Nash played with an amazing roster of players during his time in Phoneix. Marion, Joe Cool, Amare, Diaw, etc
Also, end of the day you saw it down the stretch of their careers. Kidd got a ring at the end as a starter cause he maintained his defensive value late into his career.