- 28,253
- 40,510
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2010
NASH and STOCK were both PASS first PG's thats about it.
STOCK was an initiator and facilitator, was pesky and gritty on defense.
NASH was so much more than a initator and facilitator....Nash could go get his own bucket at any time and was more of a threat from 3, reliable in the CLUTCH and could take games over.
STOCK didn't have that capacity, nor did he seek it.
don't really see the comparison here.
But to each his own.
“Take over games”?
![Laugh :lol: :lol:](/styles/default/xenforo/NTemojis/laugh.gif)
![Laugh :lol: :lol:](/styles/default/xenforo/NTemojis/laugh.gif)
![Laugh :lol: :lol:](/styles/default/xenforo/NTemojis/laugh.gif)
![Laugh :lol: :lol:](/styles/default/xenforo/NTemojis/laugh.gif)
Dude average 14ppg. Stockton averaged 13.
Please stop talking like Nash was an individual offensive juggernaut.
Nash is closer to J-Kidd, Stockton not Steph and Magic.
Without talent around him, Nash is average.
Steph and Magic could score.
Nash wasn’t a scorer in the least bit.
Stop talking about TEAM offense for a moment.
Individually, Nash wasn’t like that offensively