RustyShackleford
Supporter
- 64,893
- 195,809
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
I think 22 Ant is better than Book at 22. Ant's length and athleticism are big advantages for him.
But using All-NBA to compare them is silly
Ant is making All-NBA not only for his numbers but also team success.
Booker put up all NBA potential numbers at 22, but the Suns were dog**** by no fault of his. No way he would have made it.
But using All-NBA to compare them is silly
Ant is making All-NBA not only for his numbers but also team success.
Booker put up all NBA potential numbers at 22, but the Suns were dog**** by no fault of his. No way he would have made it.