- Dec 9, 2002
- 34,750
- 28,148
How was that a foul on Trent Jr?!
The Official NBA Season Thread
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by pmatic,
- Start date
- Jan 5, 2011
- 68,956
- 80,453
Settled for a 3. Whyyy
- Dec 9, 2002
- 34,750
- 28,148
Booooooy Dame TRAVELED 
- Aug 10, 2003
- 26,351
- 19,896
dame just walked in with an easy layup lol
- Apr 1, 2005
- 17,721
- 12,919
Dame smoove traveled … but ya know… nba
- Dec 9, 2002
- 34,750
- 28,148
Dame Lillard not walking through that door
- Jan 5, 2011
- 68,956
- 80,453
No foul, no shots. Don't be weak nba
- Oct 3, 2007
- 22,138
- 13,270
League soft. You touch someone and it’s instantly a foul 
elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 107,797
- 199,794
lawdog1
Supporter
- Sep 14, 2000
- 60,734
- 73,751
Magic picked a bad time for their worst defensive breakdown of the game.
- Jan 5, 2011
- 68,956
- 80,453
Bruhhh. No foul but they're giving Milwaukee the ball back lol
- Jan 30, 2010
- 26,079
- 47,467
- Jan 5, 2011
- 68,956
- 80,453
Lillard traveled again
- Jan 5, 2011
- 68,956
- 80,453
Dame bouta brick one guaranteed
- Jan 5, 2011
- 68,956
- 80,453
Ozempic Van Gundy
- Oct 3, 2007
- 22,138
- 13,270
That was a good look too
- Oct 13, 2001
- 162,491
- 145,197
- Mar 14, 2010
- 30,192
- 42,558
More skilled, more fragile
- Oct 13, 2001
- 162,491
- 145,197
- Dec 9, 2002
- 34,750
- 28,148
Since the NBA cup really means nothing, how do y'all feel about this: the tournament winner gets 5 wins added & 5 losses subtracted from their end of season record.
So a team that was 50-32 would have it adjusted to 55-27. Runner up would get their record adjusted by 2 games (2 wins added, 2 losses subtracted)
So a team that was 50-32 would have it adjusted to 55-27. Runner up would get their record adjusted by 2 games (2 wins added, 2 losses subtracted)
- Aug 11, 2012
- 55,809
- 148,176
Get Paid way more, play way less…& get called greater than everything before.
Best time to be an NBA player in the history of the game
- Oct 13, 2001
- 162,491
- 145,197
You said it best, it means nothing. So there shouldn't be an inflation of regular season wins because of it. It means nothing. It's just used to spark interest during Football season. Doing that ^ would give it too much value.
- Feb 5, 2013
- 39,773
- 41,754
Only if it helps the lakers get into the postseason
Otherwise, ain’t nobody coming to see the cavs Otis
- Dec 9, 2002
- 34,750
- 28,148
Ok, let's say 3 games and 1 game for the loser. Giving it value is literally the point. The lesser teams will really scrap bc they will need those games to make the playoffs.
It kinda adds a gambling element to it, but there's literally nothing to lose, but it will increase the intensity.
And while we're at it, the shots in the last second of a quarter shouldn't count towards the shooters percentage. Players are refusing to shoot them (for understandable reasons), but it takes away from the excitement of the game.
- Oct 13, 2001
- 162,491
- 145,197
I don't think it should be given any value other than being something that is used to spark interest in the NBA during NFL Season.
Teams should get wins and losses from regular season games. ANd it should only be 1 win and 1 loss at a time.
To your second point:
The NBA's experimental rule change may make a 4-point shot inevitable
There has been a lot of discussion surrounding the NBA and making the game better recently, and there's a new proposed rule that could do just that.
hoopshabit.com
