- 7,339
- 12,146
Good morning. **** Paul Pierce.
For being “trash”, The Truth gets talked about a lot in here
rent free in everybody’s head
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good morning. **** Paul Pierce.
All 3 of those players are HOFers in their generations though They would cook in any era
Of course, they would. That's why they're HoF'ers.
But look at the volume of 3's we're seeing in todays league. I didn't research this, but I'm guessing they probably attempted 2 or 4 3pta per game. In today's league , they would be taking closer to 7-8 3's/game. You don't think Ray Allen/Reggie Miller would've been explosive players today?
Similar logic is also applicable for Paul Pierce. He was heralded during his day, but playing high screen PnR, elevator screens and doors/motion offense would've been advantageous for PP. He also didn't have nearly the type of spacing most players have now. Modern day NBA caters to his game.
that's fair. perhaps there is no better alternative though it seems like decision makers for this job tend to veer in one direction when looking at head coaching candidates like it's some club. basically what i'm saying is i don't care for the power structure in the nba and feel it's pre ordained or something. pop was like three years too late in being replacedDon't think there's a better alternative.
Is there a more successful modern coach than Kerr?
4 rings as a player, 3 as a coach, helped revolutionize NBA offense, he's a worthy heir
Is there a more successful modern coach than Kerr?
4 rings as a player, 3 as a coach, helped revolutionize NBA offense, he's a worthy heir
Is there a more successful modern coach than Kerr?
4 rings as a player, 3 as a coach, helped revolutionize NBA offense, he's a worthy heir
Kyrie doesn't know what he wants does he
They were plotting for this moment
I feel like they’re are doomed.
I’m on the Myrie for -name redacted- trade wagonSixers/Nets conference finals gonna be nuts
The Answer - The Process - The Excuse
Next insurrection you're gonna see a lot of Kyrie and Beal jerseys among the insurrectionists
Lakeshow knows what's up
Twitter too wild man
i dont think team u.s.a should be getting an NBA coach. Just get a guy who either coaches in college or does not currently have a job. The nba schedule is crazy . Would be better off if they just get a guy to focus solely on usab
that's fair. perhaps there is no better alternative though it seems like decision makers for this job tend to veer in one direction when looking at head coaching candidates like it's some club. basically what i'm saying is i don't care for the power structure in the nba and feel it's pre ordained or something. pop was like three years too late in being replaced
that's pretty generous. he's also been fortunate imo.
his best career decision was not coaching for the knicks, i guess
Right time, right place. Blessed.Normal folks would agree with you. But some guys here will debate, just for the sake of it. And say he was "lucky".
For the people who don't agree--Who's a better alternative?
Right time, right place. Blessed.
We saw what happened to Luke Walton when he tried to coach the Lakers after a "successful" stint with the Warriors. Disregarding, the previous foundation laid forth by Mark Jackson then Kerr, great drafting AND roster management, etc.
Some would say Phil Jackson was lucked into his two Bulls three peats. But he clearly, "lucked" into it again with the Lakers with yet another three peat (Del Harris, etc were the previous coaches who had Shaq, Kobe on their roster). Can we argue now if Phil is a great coach? Nah. President/General Manager...fo sure.
I'm sure Kerr is a good coach. Great? Who knows.
Just like I'm not sure about Steve Nash.
Almost reads exactly word for word what was said years about Phil JacksonBro. He had KD, Clay, Draymond, Steph, etc.
Even before KD went there. He had the "Lineup of Death!!" They have the winning-est season. And went to back=to-back finals.
I'll admit there was an art/skill in achieving that overwhelming offensive superiority. But the talent was there.
I'd just like to see if he can take the Warriors back to prominence. Or if he can go to a mediocre/average team and make repeat the same. I'm not sure how "good" of a coach he is. Same way I feel about Nash (okay with him moreso).