When I was growing up we didn't have a car, we just went to places by bus or we walked, once in a blue will take the train. It was one pair of shoes for each school year. My first console was the snes & my brothers first was the Sega Genenis, we had a little small collection, but that feeling didn't last cause mofos broke into our apartment and took them. Yeah I be posting all kinds of vintage ads, but when I was little I didn't have those things. These little mofos from today don't know how good they have it, but they still wanna be mad, F them. Ungrateful pieces of sh*t. Then they wanna act like they going through something, what happened Mommy or Daddy can't get u a limited pair of J's FOH, these mofos need a reality check. They should go to them third world countries, those people right there really got it bad.
If I was a dictator, not a president, as a president can't do everything he wants to, I would be ruthless.
Only crimes that wouldn't finish by a death sentence would be stealing food in a supermarket, so it got to be food, and not from someone but from something, murder if it is self-defense or a vengeance, like people killing the murderers of their child or something like that, so I mean regular people, not criminals killing criminals or citizen, and that's all I think.
Because some drugs would be legal, other ones forbidden, and if it got to be sold to citizen, no way it would be by drug dealers as violence is a part of the process...
We keep dangerous people in life because we are supposed to be civilised, I disagree, if we got not enough evidences, I am agree, but if we are sure, what do we expect, to the one who did this to become better after being in jail with people maybe worst than him ?
Death sentence and making somewhere more secure would lead to less unemployement and less racism.
Because when everyone feels secure, no need to hate anyone. It's like saying every country has a % of "good" or "bad" elements to say it with simple words.
So if you got to accept someone in your country, it seems fair for you to chose only "good ones" as you already have "bad ones". It's pure logic.
And it also means someone honest with himself could only recognize the value of the people coming to his country.
Which helps the one who comes to feel patriot as it wasn't easy and as not everyone could come there.
That's why I think countries who chose who come in their country are right.
In France everyone could come and french patriotism is often confused with intolerance/racism/xenophobia while foreigners got the right to be patriotic, that's a non sense.
Also noticed places with a strong identity collect more respect because you can't impose them anything.
I'm not into Religion at all but sometimes it's a good thing to see a country with its official religion(s) to both accept other ones, but to not permit anyone to overwrite it/them.
