- 25,831
- 15,061
I said "reasonably well" because he shouldn't have been hired in the first place especially given his history of comments about Chelsea when he was at Liverpool (& his record there). His problems there were due to him not being able to find a consistent roster that not only caused inconsistent play but also hurt the confidence of his players there.
Rafa was correct in being labeled interim from the start was a bad move because it basically nullified whatever power he might've had in the lockeroom & with the club in general.
Sir Alex has long said that his success at Man U was attributed to 2 things; power and control. Rafa was obviously not getting much control in his role but being label interim automatically ceded any power as manager from jump. It seemed to seep away each week regardless of wins or loses.
All these problems lead to Abramovich really. If people can't see that Rafa was doomed to fail from jump, then oh well... That's my logic in my "reasonably well" assessment.
Rafa was correct in being labeled interim from the start was a bad move because it basically nullified whatever power he might've had in the lockeroom & with the club in general.
Sir Alex has long said that his success at Man U was attributed to 2 things; power and control. Rafa was obviously not getting much control in his role but being label interim automatically ceded any power as manager from jump. It seemed to seep away each week regardless of wins or loses.
All these problems lead to Abramovich really. If people can't see that Rafa was doomed to fail from jump, then oh well... That's my logic in my "reasonably well" assessment.